Review of Construction Automation and Robotics Practices in Indonesian Construction State-Owned Enterprises: Position in Project Life Cycle, Gap to Best Practice and Potential Uses

Yongki Alexander Tanne, Ni Luh Ayu Indrayani
{"title":"Review of Construction Automation and Robotics Practices in Indonesian Construction State-Owned Enterprises: Position in Project Life Cycle, Gap to Best Practice and Potential Uses","authors":"Yongki Alexander Tanne,&nbsp;Ni Luh Ayu Indrayani","doi":"10.1007/s44150-023-00098-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Construction Automation and Robotics is the anticipated technology to overcome productivity issues and work accidents. This research aims to analyze the implementation of Construction Automation and Robotics at Indonesian Construction SOEs from the perspective of real project implementation based on project life cycle, comparison with best practices, and potential uses, through the qualitative-comparative analysis of the literature as well as questionnaires and in-depth interviews. It attempts to report how this technology is implemented in Indonesia as a comparison tool for other countries. This research identifies that seven Indonesian Construction SOEs have been using Construction Automation and Robotics technology, where Drones, Virtual Reality, and Prefabrication and Modularization are the most popular and mostly implemented in the construction phase. Compared to best practices, those implementations are still in the adoption stage. It has not reached its full potential through the development stage due to insufficient collaboration between contractors, technology companies, and universities. Although the construction market in Indonesia has not directly demanded in-project applications, this technology is potentially considered to improve the completion of construction projects, especially the interaction prospects of Digital Twin and BIM. This study provides complete positional information on Construction Automation and Robotics type in the project life cycle in theory and practice as a benchmark for construction technology research. This study fills the research gap and pioneers Indonesia’s Construction Automation and Robotics implementation research in international journals by providing the latest and comprehensive overview and comparing it to good practices from the USA and China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100117,"journal":{"name":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","volume":"3 3","pages":"373 - 389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-023-00098-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Construction Automation and Robotics is the anticipated technology to overcome productivity issues and work accidents. This research aims to analyze the implementation of Construction Automation and Robotics at Indonesian Construction SOEs from the perspective of real project implementation based on project life cycle, comparison with best practices, and potential uses, through the qualitative-comparative analysis of the literature as well as questionnaires and in-depth interviews. It attempts to report how this technology is implemented in Indonesia as a comparison tool for other countries. This research identifies that seven Indonesian Construction SOEs have been using Construction Automation and Robotics technology, where Drones, Virtual Reality, and Prefabrication and Modularization are the most popular and mostly implemented in the construction phase. Compared to best practices, those implementations are still in the adoption stage. It has not reached its full potential through the development stage due to insufficient collaboration between contractors, technology companies, and universities. Although the construction market in Indonesia has not directly demanded in-project applications, this technology is potentially considered to improve the completion of construction projects, especially the interaction prospects of Digital Twin and BIM. This study provides complete positional information on Construction Automation and Robotics type in the project life cycle in theory and practice as a benchmark for construction technology research. This study fills the research gap and pioneers Indonesia’s Construction Automation and Robotics implementation research in international journals by providing the latest and comprehensive overview and comparing it to good practices from the USA and China.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾印尼国有建筑企业的建筑自动化和机器人实践:在项目生命周期中的位置,最佳实践的差距和潜在用途
建筑自动化和机器人技术有望解决生产力问题和工伤事故。本研究旨在通过对文献的定性比较分析、问卷调查和深度访谈,从项目生命周期、与最佳实践的比较和潜在用途的实际项目实施角度,分析印尼建筑业国有企业的施工自动化和机器人技术的实施情况。它试图报告这项技术是如何在印度尼西亚实施的,作为其他国家的比较工具。这项研究表明,七家印尼建筑国有企业一直在使用建筑自动化和机器人技术,其中无人机、虚拟现实、预制和模块化是最受欢迎的,并且大多在施工阶段实施。与最佳实践相比,这些实现仍处于采用阶段。由于承包商、科技公司和大学之间的合作不足,它在整个开发阶段还没有充分发挥潜力。尽管印尼建筑市场在项目应用中没有直接需求,但这项技术有可能被认为可以提高建筑项目的完成率,尤其是数字孪生和BIM的互动前景。本研究在理论和实践上提供了工程生命周期中建筑自动化和机器人类型的完整位置信息,作为建筑技术研究的基准。本研究通过提供最新、全面的概述并与美国和中国的良好实践进行比较,填补了研究空白,并在国际期刊上开创了印度尼西亚建筑自动化和机器人实施研究的先河。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of natural fibre pultruded profiles in diverse lightweight structures and architectural scenarios Mass housing in transition: innovability in large-scale housing complexes A multi-criteria decision support framework for designing seismic and thermal resilient facades Flexural behavior of natural fiber-reinforced foamed concrete beams From decay analysis to conservation plan of post-Vatican II religious architecture: Research on the Church of the Holy Family by Paolo Portoghesi in Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1