Towards Human-Vehicle Interaction: Driving Risk Analysis Under Different Driver Vigilance States and Driving Risk Detection Method

IF 4.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC Automotive Innovation Pub Date : 2023-01-27 DOI:10.1007/s42154-022-00209-w
Yingzhang Wu, Jie Zhang, Wenbo Li, Yujing Liu, Chengmou Li, Bangbei Tang, Gang Guo
{"title":"Towards Human-Vehicle Interaction: Driving Risk Analysis Under Different Driver Vigilance States and Driving Risk Detection Method","authors":"Yingzhang Wu,&nbsp;Jie Zhang,&nbsp;Wenbo Li,&nbsp;Yujing Liu,&nbsp;Chengmou Li,&nbsp;Bangbei Tang,&nbsp;Gang Guo","doi":"10.1007/s42154-022-00209-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The driver's behavior plays a crucial role in transportation safety. It is widely acknowledged that driver vigilance is a major contributor to traffic accidents. However, the quantitative impact of driver vigilance on driving risk has yet to be fully explored. This study aims to investigate the relationship between driver vigilance and driving risk, using data recorded from 28 drivers who maintain a speed of 80 km/h on a monotonous highway for 2 hours. The k-means and linear fitting methods are used to analyze the driving risk distribution under different driver vigilance states. Additionally, this study proposes a research framework for analyzing driving risk and develops three classification models (KNN, SVM, and DNN) to recognize the driving risk status. The results show that the frequency of low-risk incidents is negatively correlated with the driver's vigilance level, whereas the frequency of moderate-risk and high-risk incidents is positively correlated with the driver's vigilance level. The DNN model performs the best, achieving an accuracy of 0.972, recall of 0.972, precision of 0.973, and f1-score of 0.972, compared to KNN and SVM. This research could serve as a valuable reference for the design of warning systems and intelligent vehicles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36310,"journal":{"name":"Automotive Innovation","volume":"6 1","pages":"32 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automotive Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42154-022-00209-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The driver's behavior plays a crucial role in transportation safety. It is widely acknowledged that driver vigilance is a major contributor to traffic accidents. However, the quantitative impact of driver vigilance on driving risk has yet to be fully explored. This study aims to investigate the relationship between driver vigilance and driving risk, using data recorded from 28 drivers who maintain a speed of 80 km/h on a monotonous highway for 2 hours. The k-means and linear fitting methods are used to analyze the driving risk distribution under different driver vigilance states. Additionally, this study proposes a research framework for analyzing driving risk and develops three classification models (KNN, SVM, and DNN) to recognize the driving risk status. The results show that the frequency of low-risk incidents is negatively correlated with the driver's vigilance level, whereas the frequency of moderate-risk and high-risk incidents is positively correlated with the driver's vigilance level. The DNN model performs the best, achieving an accuracy of 0.972, recall of 0.972, precision of 0.973, and f1-score of 0.972, compared to KNN and SVM. This research could serve as a valuable reference for the design of warning systems and intelligent vehicles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向人车交互:不同驾驶员警戒状态下的驾驶风险分析及驾驶风险检测方法
驾驶员的行为对运输安全起着至关重要的作用。人们普遍认为,驾驶员的警惕性是造成交通事故的主要原因。然而,驾驶员警惕性对驾驶风险的量化影响尚待充分探索。本研究旨在调查驾驶员警惕性与驾驶风险之间的关系,使用28名驾驶员的数据,这些驾驶员在单调的高速公路上保持80公里/小时的速度达2小时。采用k均值和线性拟合方法分析了不同驾驶员警戒状态下的驾驶风险分布。此外,本研究提出了一个分析驾驶风险的研究框架,并开发了三个分类模型(KNN、SVM和DNN)来识别驾驶风险状况。结果表明,低风险事件的发生频率与驾驶员的警戒水平呈负相关,而中风险和高风险事件的频率与驾驶员警戒水平呈正相关。与KNN和SVM相比,DNN模型表现最好,准确度为0.972,召回率为0.972、精确度为0.973,f1得分为0.972。该研究可为预警系统和智能汽车的设计提供有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Automotive Innovation
Automotive Innovation Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.90%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Automotive Innovation is dedicated to the publication of innovative findings in the automotive field as well as other related disciplines, covering the principles, methodologies, theoretical studies, experimental studies, product engineering and engineering application. The main topics include but are not limited to: energy-saving, electrification, intelligent and connected, new energy vehicle, safety and lightweight technologies. The journal presents the latest trend and advances of automotive technology.
期刊最新文献
Driver Steering Behaviour Modelling Based on Neuromuscular Dynamics and Multi-Task Time-Series Transformer Mechanically Joined Extrusion Profiles for Battery Trays Mode Switching and Consistency Control for Electric-Hydraulic Hybrid Steering System Review of Electrical and Electronic Architectures for Autonomous Vehicles: Topologies, Networking and Simulators In-Vehicle Network Injection Attacks Detection Based on Feature Selection and Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1