Performance Evaluation Method for Automated Driving System in Logical Scenario

IF 4.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC Automotive Innovation Pub Date : 2022-06-24 DOI:10.1007/s42154-022-00191-3
Peixing Zhang, Bing Zhu, Jian Zhao, Tianxin Fan, Yuhang Sun
{"title":"Performance Evaluation Method for Automated Driving System in Logical Scenario","authors":"Peixing Zhang,&nbsp;Bing Zhu,&nbsp;Jian Zhao,&nbsp;Tianxin Fan,&nbsp;Yuhang Sun","doi":"10.1007/s42154-022-00191-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the continuous improvement of automated driving technology, how to evaluate the performance of an automated driving system is attracting more and more attention. Meanwhile, with the creation of scenario-based test methods, the traditional evaluation index based on a single test can no longer meet the requirements of high-level safety verification for automated driving system, and the performance evaluation of such a system in logical scenarios will be the mainstream. Based on the scenario-based test method and Turing test theory, a performance evaluation method for an automated driving system in the whole parameter space of a logical scenario is proposed. The logical scenario parameter space is partitioned according to the risk degree of concrete scenario, and the evaluation process in different zones are determined. Subsequently, the anthropomorphic index in the safe zone and the collision-avoidance index in the danger zone are defined by comparing test results of human driving and ideal vehicle motion. Taking front vehicle low-speed and cut-out scenarios as examples, two automated driving algorithms are tested in the virtual environment, and the test results are evaluated both by the proposed method and by human observation. The results show that the results of the proposed method are consistent with the subjective feelings of humans; additionally, it can be applied to scenario-based tests and the verification process of an automated driving system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36310,"journal":{"name":"Automotive Innovation","volume":"5 3","pages":"299 - 310"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42154-022-00191-3.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automotive Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42154-022-00191-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

With the continuous improvement of automated driving technology, how to evaluate the performance of an automated driving system is attracting more and more attention. Meanwhile, with the creation of scenario-based test methods, the traditional evaluation index based on a single test can no longer meet the requirements of high-level safety verification for automated driving system, and the performance evaluation of such a system in logical scenarios will be the mainstream. Based on the scenario-based test method and Turing test theory, a performance evaluation method for an automated driving system in the whole parameter space of a logical scenario is proposed. The logical scenario parameter space is partitioned according to the risk degree of concrete scenario, and the evaluation process in different zones are determined. Subsequently, the anthropomorphic index in the safe zone and the collision-avoidance index in the danger zone are defined by comparing test results of human driving and ideal vehicle motion. Taking front vehicle low-speed and cut-out scenarios as examples, two automated driving algorithms are tested in the virtual environment, and the test results are evaluated both by the proposed method and by human observation. The results show that the results of the proposed method are consistent with the subjective feelings of humans; additionally, it can be applied to scenario-based tests and the verification process of an automated driving system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
逻辑场景下自动驾驶系统的性能评估方法
随着自动驾驶技术的不断进步,如何评价自动驾驶系统的性能越来越受到人们的关注。同时,随着基于场景的测试方法的创建,传统的基于单一测试的评估指标已不能满足自动驾驶系统高级别安全验证的要求,逻辑场景下的性能评估将成为主流。基于基于场景的测试方法和图灵测试理论,提出了一种在逻辑场景的整个参数空间中对自动驾驶系统进行性能评估的方法。根据具体场景的风险程度划分逻辑场景参数空间,确定不同区域的评估过程。随后,通过比较人类驾驶和理想车辆运动的测试结果,定义了安全区的拟人化指数和危险区的防撞指数。以前车低速和切出场景为例,在虚拟环境中测试了两种自动驾驶算法,并通过所提出的方法和人工观察对测试结果进行了评价。结果表明,该方法的结果符合人类的主观感受;此外,它还可以应用于基于场景的测试和自动驾驶系统的验证过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Automotive Innovation
Automotive Innovation Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.90%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Automotive Innovation is dedicated to the publication of innovative findings in the automotive field as well as other related disciplines, covering the principles, methodologies, theoretical studies, experimental studies, product engineering and engineering application. The main topics include but are not limited to: energy-saving, electrification, intelligent and connected, new energy vehicle, safety and lightweight technologies. The journal presents the latest trend and advances of automotive technology.
期刊最新文献
Driver Steering Behaviour Modelling Based on Neuromuscular Dynamics and Multi-Task Time-Series Transformer Mechanically Joined Extrusion Profiles for Battery Trays Mode Switching and Consistency Control for Electric-Hydraulic Hybrid Steering System Review of Electrical and Electronic Architectures for Autonomous Vehicles: Topologies, Networking and Simulators In-Vehicle Network Injection Attacks Detection Based on Feature Selection and Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1