One hundred years of dynamic minimum wage regulation: Lessons from Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS International Labour Review Pub Date : 2022-11-22 DOI:10.1111/ilr.12380
Reg HAMILTON, Matt NICHOL
{"title":"One hundred years of dynamic minimum wage regulation: Lessons from Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States","authors":"Reg HAMILTON,&nbsp;Matt NICHOL","doi":"10.1111/ilr.12380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since the first minimum wage legislation was introduced in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States in the early 1900s, minimum wage regulation has attracted controversy. Opponents of minimum wages use market theory to defend their position, while supporters justify state intervention based on principles of equity and social good. This article examines how these two ideological positions have influenced the fixing of wages, and the ensuing results. As little comparative research exists on the origins, evolution and current systems of minimum wage regulation in the three countries, this article aims to address the gap in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":47216,"journal":{"name":"International Labour Review","volume":"162 3","pages":"407-429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Labour Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the first minimum wage legislation was introduced in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States in the early 1900s, minimum wage regulation has attracted controversy. Opponents of minimum wages use market theory to defend their position, while supporters justify state intervention based on principles of equity and social good. This article examines how these two ideological positions have influenced the fixing of wages, and the ensuing results. As little comparative research exists on the origins, evolution and current systems of minimum wage regulation in the three countries, this article aims to address the gap in the literature.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
百年动态最低工资监管:澳大利亚、英国和美国的经验教训
自20世纪初澳大利亚、英国和美国出台第一部最低工资立法以来,最低工资监管一直备受争议。最低工资的反对者使用市场理论来捍卫他们的立场,而支持者则根据公平和社会公益原则为国家干预辩护。本文考察了这两种意识形态立场如何影响工资的确定,以及随之而来的结果。由于对三国最低工资监管的起源、演变和现行制度的比较研究较少,本文旨在填补文献中的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The International Labour Review is the world"s leading multidisciplinary journal of labour market institutions and economics. Its aim is to advance academic research and inform policy debate and decision-making in these fields by bringing together the original thinking of lawyers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and industrial relations specialists on a broad range of labour market policy and social protection concerns. The International Labour Review also features concise reports on current developments considered to be of particular interest to those working in these fields and reviews of recent major publications. It is committed to an editorial policy that combines accessibility with rigorous, insightful analysis and the highest scholarly standards.
期刊最新文献
The persistence of informality in paid domestic work in Argentina Introduction: The formalization of paid domestic work – Current trajectories and challenges ahead Issue Information – TOC From dead letter to functional policy? Domestic workers' rights and “disformality” in Peru Domestic workers' organizations and participatory approaches to labour standards enforcement: The case of Jamaica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1