The role of perceived autonomy-supportive communication for motivating prejudice reduction and avoiding defiant backlash within the police force workplace

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI:10.1111/jasp.12953
Netta Weinstein, Nicole Legate, Les Graham, Yuyan Zheng, Marisa Plater, Maya Al-Khouja, Arlen C. Moller
{"title":"The role of perceived autonomy-supportive communication for motivating prejudice reduction and avoiding defiant backlash within the police force workplace","authors":"Netta Weinstein,&nbsp;Nicole Legate,&nbsp;Les Graham,&nbsp;Yuyan Zheng,&nbsp;Marisa Plater,&nbsp;Maya Al-Khouja,&nbsp;Arlen C. Moller","doi":"10.1111/jasp.12953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Workplace prejudice-reduction efforts tend to be short lived at best, and can even arouse defiance, or a desire to oppose requests or rules, in employees. The motivational approach of self-determination theory (SDT) describes how communicating about prejudice reduction can be scaffolded in ways that inspire genuine motivation and avoid eliciting defensive responses. From an SDT perspective, such autonomy-supportive communications take the perspective of the employee, provide choice about how to best approach attitude change, provide a rationale or compelling reason for the importance of change, offer structure through explaining the consequences of bias, and avoid the use of shame to compel change. In two multi-wave studies with British police officers and staff, we hypothesized that employees would report lower prejudice (operationalized as having less antagonistic attitudes toward police forces investing in diversity) when they perceived forces to communicate about prejudice in autonomy-supportive ways (Studies 1 and 2). We also tested whether this association would be explained by lower defiance when perceiving the force to communicate in autonomy-supportive ways (Study 2). Results supported the main effect of perceived autonomy-supportive communication relating to lower prejudice in multi-wave (Study 1, <i>n</i> = 1226) and longitudinal data (Study 2, <i>n</i> = 232). We consider implications for communicating about prejudice-reduction efforts in the workplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":48404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jasp.12953","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Workplace prejudice-reduction efforts tend to be short lived at best, and can even arouse defiance, or a desire to oppose requests or rules, in employees. The motivational approach of self-determination theory (SDT) describes how communicating about prejudice reduction can be scaffolded in ways that inspire genuine motivation and avoid eliciting defensive responses. From an SDT perspective, such autonomy-supportive communications take the perspective of the employee, provide choice about how to best approach attitude change, provide a rationale or compelling reason for the importance of change, offer structure through explaining the consequences of bias, and avoid the use of shame to compel change. In two multi-wave studies with British police officers and staff, we hypothesized that employees would report lower prejudice (operationalized as having less antagonistic attitudes toward police forces investing in diversity) when they perceived forces to communicate about prejudice in autonomy-supportive ways (Studies 1 and 2). We also tested whether this association would be explained by lower defiance when perceiving the force to communicate in autonomy-supportive ways (Study 2). Results supported the main effect of perceived autonomy-supportive communication relating to lower prejudice in multi-wave (Study 1, n = 1226) and longitudinal data (Study 2, n = 232). We consider implications for communicating about prejudice-reduction efforts in the workplace.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感知自主性支持性沟通在促进减少偏见和避免警察工作场所内的反抗方面的作用
减少工作场所偏见的努力充其量只是短暂的,甚至可能引起员工的反抗,或反对要求或规则的欲望。自决理论的动机方法(SDT)描述了如何以激发真正动机和避免引发防御反应的方式来构建关于减少偏见的沟通。从SDT的角度来看,这种支持自主性的沟通从员工的角度出发,提供如何最好地应对态度变化的选择,为变化的重要性提供理由或令人信服的理由,通过解释偏见的后果来提供结构,并避免使用羞耻感来迫使改变。在两项针对英国警察和工作人员的多波研究中,我们假设,当员工感知到部队以支持自主的方式交流偏见时,他们会报告较低的偏见(表现为对投资于多样性的警察部队的敌对态度较少)(研究1和2)。我们还测试了当感知到以自主支持的方式进行沟通的力量时,这种联系是否会被较低的蔑视所解释(研究2)。结果支持了感知自主支持性沟通与多波中较低偏见相关的主要影响(研究1,n = 1226)和纵向数据(研究2,n = 232)。我们考虑了在工作场所沟通减少偏见工作的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Published since 1971, Journal of Applied Social Psychology is a monthly publication devoted to applications of experimental behavioral science research to problems of society (e.g., organizational and leadership psychology, safety, health, and gender issues; perceptions of war and natural hazards; jury deliberation; performance, AIDS, cancer, heart disease, exercise, and sports).
期刊最新文献
Using self‐determination theory to link empathy and voluntary health behaviors Issue Information Belief in conspiracy theories and satisfaction in interpersonal relationships Workplace loneliness: Relationships with abstract entities as substitutes for peer relationships Motivated perception of leaders when perceived political party continuity is low: The mediating role of self‐uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1