Women self-help groups and intra-household decision-making in agriculture

IF 2.5 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics Pub Date : 2023-06-07 DOI:10.1111/apce.12442
Subash Surendran Padmaja, Aditya Korekallu Srinivasa, Pooja Trivedi, Kondapi Srinivas
{"title":"Women self-help groups and intra-household decision-making in agriculture","authors":"Subash Surendran Padmaja,&nbsp;Aditya Korekallu Srinivasa,&nbsp;Pooja Trivedi,&nbsp;Kondapi Srinivas","doi":"10.1111/apce.12442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines the effect of women-centric agricultural self-help groups (SHGs) on intra-household decision-making in agriculture. Using data collected from an intra-household survey of 815 households, we analyze the effect of women's membership in different types of SHGs on 14 decisions related to farms and households. Specifically, we investigate the discord in decision-making, which is the difference in the perceived decision-making roles of spouses within a household. Our results show that women's participation in SHGs has increased their role in decision-making by 8–13%. However, the effects vary according to the type of intervention and the decision. We found fewer discords in intra-household decision-making in seed SHGs than in micro-finance SHGs. In conclusion, our study suggests that women's engagement in agriculture-based SHG interventions can encourage joint decision-making, but the magnitude of this effect depends on the type of SHG. Development agencies can use this information to design interventions targeted at empowering women through the improvement of the agricultural value chain.</p>","PeriodicalId":51632,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics","volume":"94 3","pages":"857-876"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apce.12442","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apce.12442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the effect of women-centric agricultural self-help groups (SHGs) on intra-household decision-making in agriculture. Using data collected from an intra-household survey of 815 households, we analyze the effect of women's membership in different types of SHGs on 14 decisions related to farms and households. Specifically, we investigate the discord in decision-making, which is the difference in the perceived decision-making roles of spouses within a household. Our results show that women's participation in SHGs has increased their role in decision-making by 8–13%. However, the effects vary according to the type of intervention and the decision. We found fewer discords in intra-household decision-making in seed SHGs than in micro-finance SHGs. In conclusion, our study suggests that women's engagement in agriculture-based SHG interventions can encourage joint decision-making, but the magnitude of this effect depends on the type of SHG. Development agencies can use this information to design interventions targeted at empowering women through the improvement of the agricultural value chain.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女自助团体和家庭内部农业决策
本研究考察了以妇女为中心的农业自助团体(SHG)对农业家庭内部决策的影响。利用从815个家庭的家庭内部调查中收集的数据,我们分析了妇女在不同类型的SHG中的成员身份对14个与农场和家庭有关的决策的影响。具体而言,我们调查了决策中的不和谐,即配偶在家庭中感知的决策角色的差异。我们的研究结果表明,妇女参与SHG使她们在决策中的作用增加了8-13%。然而,效果因干预类型和决策而异。我们发现,种子SHG中的家庭内部决策不一致比小额金融SHG中更少。总之,我们的研究表明,妇女参与基于农业的SHG干预可以鼓励联合决策,但这种影响的大小取决于SHG的类型。发展机构可以利用这些信息制定干预措施,通过改善农业价值链增强妇女权能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Issue Information INDEX TO VOLUME 95–2024 Do sustainable savings decisions through deposits and shares by members influence the choice of financial cooperatives? How do business associations support contract enforcement? Evidence from Hungary Government dishonesty, trust and cooperative behaviour: Evidence from China's Great Leap Forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1