In pursuit of impact: Toward a contextualized theory of professional agency of engineering education scholars

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Engineering Education Pub Date : 2023-01-10 DOI:10.1002/jee.20496
Alexandra Coso Strong, Courtney J. Faber, Walter C. Lee, Cheryl A. Bodnar, Courtney Smith-Orr, Erin McCave
{"title":"In pursuit of impact: Toward a contextualized theory of professional agency of engineering education scholars","authors":"Alexandra Coso Strong,&nbsp;Courtney J. Faber,&nbsp;Walter C. Lee,&nbsp;Cheryl A. Bodnar,&nbsp;Courtney Smith-Orr,&nbsp;Erin McCave","doi":"10.1002/jee.20496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Engineering education scholars (EES) seek to advance innovation, excellence, and access within education systems and the engineering profession. To advance such efforts, the intentional and strategic actions taken by scholars must be better understood.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose/Hypothesis</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to advance the field's understanding of agency toward impact by (1) closely examining the experiences of early career EES pursuing impact in engineering education and (2) co-constructing a contextualized theory of agency. We define agency as taking strategic actions or perspectives toward professional goals that matter to oneself and goals that relate to impacting engineering education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design/Method</h3>\n \n <p>Building on previous work about faculty agency, we leveraged approaches from grounded theory and integrated multiple qualitative approaches to analyze our experiences as six early career EES over the course of a 4-year longitudinal study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seven key insights about the professional agency toward impact in engineering education of early career EES emerged from the analysis. The contextualized theory and resulting visual representation illustrate this agency as a cyclical process with three components: (1) the factors influencing one's agency, (2) the agentic process itself, and (3) the output of the agentic process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our co-constructed contextualized theory extends previous work by incorporating the temporal nature of agency, the generation and assessment of available moves, and the importance of feedback on future agentic practices. Our results have implications on how the engineering education community supports graduate students, early career scholars, and new members in their efforts to impact change.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jee.20496","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Engineering education scholars (EES) seek to advance innovation, excellence, and access within education systems and the engineering profession. To advance such efforts, the intentional and strategic actions taken by scholars must be better understood.

Purpose/Hypothesis

This study aimed to advance the field's understanding of agency toward impact by (1) closely examining the experiences of early career EES pursuing impact in engineering education and (2) co-constructing a contextualized theory of agency. We define agency as taking strategic actions or perspectives toward professional goals that matter to oneself and goals that relate to impacting engineering education.

Design/Method

Building on previous work about faculty agency, we leveraged approaches from grounded theory and integrated multiple qualitative approaches to analyze our experiences as six early career EES over the course of a 4-year longitudinal study.

Results

Seven key insights about the professional agency toward impact in engineering education of early career EES emerged from the analysis. The contextualized theory and resulting visual representation illustrate this agency as a cyclical process with three components: (1) the factors influencing one's agency, (2) the agentic process itself, and (3) the output of the agentic process.

Conclusions

Our co-constructed contextualized theory extends previous work by incorporating the temporal nature of agency, the generation and assessment of available moves, and the importance of feedback on future agentic practices. Our results have implications on how the engineering education community supports graduate students, early career scholars, and new members in their efforts to impact change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
追求影响力:走向工程教育学者专业代理的情境化理论
背景工程教育学者(EES)寻求在教育系统和工程专业中推进创新、卓越和准入。为了推进这些努力,必须更好地理解学者们采取的有意和战略性行动。目的/假设本研究旨在通过(1)仔细研究早期职业EES在工程教育中追求影响力的经历,以及(2)共同构建一个情境化的代理理论,来促进该领域对代理对影响力的理解。我们将代理定义为对自己重要的职业目标和影响工程教育的目标采取战略行动或观点。设计/方法在之前关于教师代理的工作的基础上,我们利用扎根理论的方法,结合多种定性方法,在一项为期4年的纵向研究中,分析了我们作为六名早期职业EES的经历。结果从分析中得出了关于职业代理对早期职业EES工程教育影响的七个关键见解。情境化理论和由此产生的视觉表征将这种代理描述为一个由三个组成部分组成的循环过程:(1)影响代理的因素,(2)代理过程本身,以及(3)代理过程的输出。结论我们共同构建的情境化理论通过结合代理的时间性质、可用动作的生成和评估,以及对未来代理实践的反馈的重要性,扩展了先前的工作。我们的研究结果对工程教育界如何支持研究生、早期职业学者和新成员努力影响变革具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Education
Journal of Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) serves to cultivate, disseminate, and archive scholarly research in engineering education.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Celebrating outstanding publications and reviewers from the 2023 volume Professorial intentions of engineering PhDs from historically excluded groups: The influence of graduate school experiences Through their eyes: Understanding institutional factors that impact the transfer processes of Black engineering students An exploration of psychological safety and conflict in first-year engineering student teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1