Carlos Miranda, Rene M. Boiteau, Amy M. McKenna, Angela N. Knapp
{"title":"Quantitative and qualitative comparison of marine dissolved organic nitrogen recovery using solid phase extraction","authors":"Carlos Miranda, Rene M. Boiteau, Amy M. McKenna, Angela N. Knapp","doi":"10.1002/lom3.10558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Marine dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen (DOC and DON) are major global carbon and nutrient reservoirs, and their characterization relies on extraction methods for preconcentration and salt removal. Existing methods optimize for capturing and describing DOC. Here, we report an optimized analytical strategy to recover marine DON for subsequent molecular characterization. Retention efficiencies between 5% and 95% are reported for seven solid phase extraction (SPE) sorbents, with PPL recovering 23% of marine DON compared to 95% recovered with C<sub>18</sub>. Additional comparisons of the effect of varying sample volumes and elution speed, and the resulting molecular composition of DON extracts, were investigated using C<sub>18</sub> and PPL sorbents. Sample volumes > 200 mL decreased DON retention efficiency independent of SPE sorbent, and gravity elution recovered 1.7- to 4.2-fold more DON compared to vacuum elution. Characterization of extracted DON by negative-ion electrospray ionization Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) highlights compositional differences between DON species recovered by each method. DON isolated with optimized methods includes low molecular weight (< 600 Da) peptide-like compounds with low O:C ratios (0.2 to 0.5) that are not detected by other SPE sorbents (e.g., PPL). The majority of additional DON isolated with this approach was undetectable by direct infusion negative mode FT-ICR MS analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18145,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","volume":"21 8","pages":"467-477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lom3.10558","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Marine dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen (DOC and DON) are major global carbon and nutrient reservoirs, and their characterization relies on extraction methods for preconcentration and salt removal. Existing methods optimize for capturing and describing DOC. Here, we report an optimized analytical strategy to recover marine DON for subsequent molecular characterization. Retention efficiencies between 5% and 95% are reported for seven solid phase extraction (SPE) sorbents, with PPL recovering 23% of marine DON compared to 95% recovered with C18. Additional comparisons of the effect of varying sample volumes and elution speed, and the resulting molecular composition of DON extracts, were investigated using C18 and PPL sorbents. Sample volumes > 200 mL decreased DON retention efficiency independent of SPE sorbent, and gravity elution recovered 1.7- to 4.2-fold more DON compared to vacuum elution. Characterization of extracted DON by negative-ion electrospray ionization Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) highlights compositional differences between DON species recovered by each method. DON isolated with optimized methods includes low molecular weight (< 600 Da) peptide-like compounds with low O:C ratios (0.2 to 0.5) that are not detected by other SPE sorbents (e.g., PPL). The majority of additional DON isolated with this approach was undetectable by direct infusion negative mode FT-ICR MS analysis.
期刊介绍:
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods (ISSN 1541-5856) is a companion to ASLO''s top-rated journal Limnology and Oceanography, and articles are held to the same high standards. In order to provide the most rapid publication consistent with high standards, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods appears in electronic format only, and the entire submission and review system is online. Articles are posted as soon as they are accepted and formatted for publication.
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods will consider manuscripts whose primary focus is methodological, and that deal with problems in the aquatic sciences. Manuscripts may present new measurement equipment, techniques for analyzing observations or samples, methods for understanding and interpreting information, analyses of metadata to examine the effectiveness of approaches, invited and contributed reviews and syntheses, and techniques for communicating and teaching in the aquatic sciences.