What is the benefit of membership in farm producer organizations? The case of coffee producers in Peru

IF 2.5 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics Pub Date : 2022-09-05 DOI:10.1111/apce.12390
Jasper Grashuis, Theodoros Skevas
{"title":"What is the benefit of membership in farm producer organizations? The case of coffee producers in Peru","authors":"Jasper Grashuis,&nbsp;Theodoros Skevas","doi":"10.1111/apce.12390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Empirical evidence of the benefit of farm producer organizations (FPOs) in the developing world is mounting. There is, however, no work in South America on the relationship between FPO membership and farm-level performance. We address the gap by estimating the treatment effect of FPO membership with respect to three outcomes: quantity produced, quantity sold, and price received. The empirical application focuses on the Peruvian coffee sector, where FPOs may have played an important role during the recent price crisis. A sample of approximately 9,000 survey responses from Peruvian coffee producers during the 2015–19 period is used in the analysis. Results show a positive treatment effect of FPO membership on all three farm-level outcomes. Compared to non-FPO members, FPO members produced 120–295 kg/ha more, sold 118–296 kg/ha more, and received 0.42–1.53 PEN/kg more. We also find evidence of heterogeneity in the estimated effect of FPO membership across time, farm size, and membership probability. The findings yield novel implications in terms of policy support for FPOs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51632,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics","volume":"94 2","pages":"423-443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apce.12390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Empirical evidence of the benefit of farm producer organizations (FPOs) in the developing world is mounting. There is, however, no work in South America on the relationship between FPO membership and farm-level performance. We address the gap by estimating the treatment effect of FPO membership with respect to three outcomes: quantity produced, quantity sold, and price received. The empirical application focuses on the Peruvian coffee sector, where FPOs may have played an important role during the recent price crisis. A sample of approximately 9,000 survey responses from Peruvian coffee producers during the 2015–19 period is used in the analysis. Results show a positive treatment effect of FPO membership on all three farm-level outcomes. Compared to non-FPO members, FPO members produced 120–295 kg/ha more, sold 118–296 kg/ha more, and received 0.42–1.53 PEN/kg more. We also find evidence of heterogeneity in the estimated effect of FPO membership across time, farm size, and membership probability. The findings yield novel implications in terms of policy support for FPOs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加入农业生产者组织有什么好处?秘鲁咖啡生产商的案例
发展中国家农业生产者组织(FPO)的利益的经验证据越来越多。然而,在南美洲,没有关于FPO成员资格与农场绩效之间关系的研究。我们通过估计FPO会员在三个结果方面的治疗效果来解决这一差距:生产量、销售量和收到价格。实证应用集中在秘鲁咖啡行业,在最近的价格危机中,FPO可能发挥了重要作用。分析中使用了2015-19年期间秘鲁咖啡生产商的约9000份调查回复样本。结果显示,FPO成员资格对所有三个农场级别的结果都有积极的治疗效果。与非FPO成员相比,FPO成员的产量增加了120–295公斤/公顷,销售额增加了118–296公斤/公顷。我们还发现了FPO成员资格在时间、农场规模和成员概率方面的估计效果存在异质性的证据。研究结果对FPO的政策支持产生了新的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Issue Information INDEX TO VOLUME 95–2024 Do sustainable savings decisions through deposits and shares by members influence the choice of financial cooperatives? How do business associations support contract enforcement? Evidence from Hungary Government dishonesty, trust and cooperative behaviour: Evidence from China's Great Leap Forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1