Sources of Inaccuracy in Boron Isotope Measurement Using LA-MC-ICP-MS

IF 2.7 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research Pub Date : 2023-05-16 DOI:10.1111/ggr.12511
Jan Fietzke, Eleni Anagnostou
{"title":"Sources of Inaccuracy in Boron Isotope Measurement Using LA-MC-ICP-MS","authors":"Jan Fietzke,&nbsp;Eleni Anagnostou","doi":"10.1111/ggr.12511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Laser ablation multi-collector-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICP-MS) has become a valuable tool for the <i>in situ</i> measurement of the boron isotope composition of geological samples at high (tens to hundreds of μm) spatial resolution. That said, this application suffers from significant analytical challenges. We focus in this study on the underlying processes of two of the main causes for inaccuracies using this technique. We provide empirical evidence that not only Ca ions (Sadekov <i>et al</i>. 2019, Standish <i>et al</i>. 2019, Evans <i>et al</i>. 2021) but also Ar ions, that are reflected within the flight tube of the mass spectrometer, are the source for previously reported issues with spectral baselines. We also address the impact of plasma conditions on the instrumental mass fractionation as a source for matrix- and mass-load-related analytical biases. Comparing experimental data with the results of a dedicated release and diffusion model (RDM) we estimate that a close to complete (~ 97%) release of boron from the sample aerosol is needed to allow for consistently accurate LA boron isotope measurement results without the need for corrections.</p>","PeriodicalId":12631,"journal":{"name":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","volume":"47 3","pages":"481-492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ggr.12511","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laser ablation multi-collector-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICP-MS) has become a valuable tool for the in situ measurement of the boron isotope composition of geological samples at high (tens to hundreds of μm) spatial resolution. That said, this application suffers from significant analytical challenges. We focus in this study on the underlying processes of two of the main causes for inaccuracies using this technique. We provide empirical evidence that not only Ca ions (Sadekov et al. 2019, Standish et al. 2019, Evans et al. 2021) but also Ar ions, that are reflected within the flight tube of the mass spectrometer, are the source for previously reported issues with spectral baselines. We also address the impact of plasma conditions on the instrumental mass fractionation as a source for matrix- and mass-load-related analytical biases. Comparing experimental data with the results of a dedicated release and diffusion model (RDM) we estimate that a close to complete (~ 97%) release of boron from the sample aerosol is needed to allow for consistently accurate LA boron isotope measurement results without the need for corrections.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LA-MC-ICP-MS测量硼同位素的不准确性来源
激光烧蚀多收集器电感耦合等离子体质谱(LA-MC-ICP-MS)已成为在高(数十至数百μm)空间分辨率下原位测量地质样品硼同位素组成的一种有价值的工具。也就是说,该应用程序面临着重大的分析挑战。在这项研究中,我们重点关注使用该技术导致不准确的两个主要原因的潜在过程。我们提供的经验证据表明,不仅Ca离子(Sadekov等人2019,Standish等人2019,Evans等人2021),而且在质谱仪飞行管内反射的Ar离子,都是先前报道的光谱基线问题的来源。我们还讨论了等离子体条件对仪器质量分馏的影响,作为基质和质量负荷相关分析偏差的来源。将实验数据与专门的释放和扩散模型(RDM)的结果进行比较,我们估计(~ 97%)从样品气溶胶中释放硼,以允许在不需要校正的情况下获得一致精确的LA硼同位素测量结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research is an international journal dedicated to advancing the science of reference materials, analytical techniques and data quality relevant to the chemical analysis of geological and environmental samples. Papers are accepted for publication following peer review.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information IAG Membership Information Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research GGR Handbook of Rock and Mineral Analysis Chapter 5 The Inductively Coupled Plasma GGR Handbook of Rock and Mineral Analysis [Chapter 13] Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1