Surgical excision methods for skin cancer involving the nail unit: A systematic review

Claire M. Hardie, Ryckie G. Wade, Justin C. R. Wormald, Brian Stafford, Faye Elliott, Julia Newton-Bishop, Donald Dewar
{"title":"Surgical excision methods for skin cancer involving the nail unit: A systematic review","authors":"Claire M. Hardie,&nbsp;Ryckie G. Wade,&nbsp;Justin C. R. Wormald,&nbsp;Brian Stafford,&nbsp;Faye Elliott,&nbsp;Julia Newton-Bishop,&nbsp;Donald Dewar","doi":"10.1002/cesm.12026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Skin cancer affecting the nail unit is rare but is associated with morbidity, and melanoma has a high mortality rate. The principal treatment is surgical excision and methods can be classified into digit-sparing surgery or amputation. Digit-sparing surgery (wide excision or Mohs surgery) may be safe and effective for malignancies involving the nail unit in comparison to amputation if there is not bony invasion. The objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of different methods of surgical excision for skin cancer involving the nail unit.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective comparative studies (randomized controlled studies, non-randomized controlled studies and prospective observational studies) of surgical excision for skin cancer of the nail unit in all participants were eligible for inclusion. We searched electronic databases, trials registers and conference abstracts. We checked the reference lists of included studies and related systematic reviews for further references to relevant studies, and we contacted experts to enquire if they were aware of any additional relevant trials. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were overall survival, disease free survival and adverse events/outcomes at 30 days. The secondary outcomes were quality of life outcomes. We planned to use GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for each outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We did not identify any studies that met the inclusion criteria for this review. We have been unable to assess our outcomes of overall survival, disease free survival, adverse events/effects and quality of life.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>As we have not identified any studies for inclusion, we are unable to assess the efficacy and safety of different methods of surgical excision for skin cancer involving the nail unit. We suggest that comprehensive cancer registry analysis is required in this field to obtain meaningful data.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100286,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods","volume":"1 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cesm.12026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cesm.12026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Skin cancer affecting the nail unit is rare but is associated with morbidity, and melanoma has a high mortality rate. The principal treatment is surgical excision and methods can be classified into digit-sparing surgery or amputation. Digit-sparing surgery (wide excision or Mohs surgery) may be safe and effective for malignancies involving the nail unit in comparison to amputation if there is not bony invasion. The objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of different methods of surgical excision for skin cancer involving the nail unit.

Methods

Prospective comparative studies (randomized controlled studies, non-randomized controlled studies and prospective observational studies) of surgical excision for skin cancer of the nail unit in all participants were eligible for inclusion. We searched electronic databases, trials registers and conference abstracts. We checked the reference lists of included studies and related systematic reviews for further references to relevant studies, and we contacted experts to enquire if they were aware of any additional relevant trials. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were overall survival, disease free survival and adverse events/outcomes at 30 days. The secondary outcomes were quality of life outcomes. We planned to use GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for each outcome.

Results

We did not identify any studies that met the inclusion criteria for this review. We have been unable to assess our outcomes of overall survival, disease free survival, adverse events/effects and quality of life.

Conclusions

As we have not identified any studies for inclusion, we are unable to assess the efficacy and safety of different methods of surgical excision for skin cancer involving the nail unit. We suggest that comprehensive cancer registry analysis is required in this field to obtain meaningful data.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮肤癌症涉及指甲单位的手术切除方法:系统综述
简介影响指甲单位的皮肤癌症很罕见,但与发病率有关,黑色素瘤死亡率很高。主要的治疗方法是手术切除,方法可分为保留手指手术或截肢。如果没有骨侵犯,与截肢相比,保留手指手术(大面积切除或Mohs手术)对涉及指甲单元的恶性肿瘤可能是安全有效的。目的是评估不同方法的皮肤癌症手术切除涉及指甲单位的有效性和安全性。方法对所有受试者进行指甲部皮肤癌症手术切除的前瞻性比较研究(随机对照研究、非随机对照研究和前瞻性观察性研究)。我们搜索了电子数据库、试验登记册和会议摘要。我们检查了纳入研究的参考文献列表和相关系统综述,以获取对相关研究的进一步参考,并联系了专家,询问他们是否知道任何其他相关试验。我们使用了Cochrane期望的标准方法学程序。主要结果是总生存率、无疾病生存率和30天的不良事件/结果。次要结果是生活质量结果。我们计划使用GRADE来评估每个结果的证据质量。结果我们没有发现任何符合本综述纳入标准的研究。我们无法评估我们的总体生存率、无疾病生存率、不良事件/影响和生活质量的结果。结论由于我们尚未确定任何可纳入的研究,我们无法评估涉及指甲单元的皮肤癌症不同手术切除方法的有效性和安全性。我们建议在这一领域需要进行全面的癌症登记分析,以获得有意义的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Methodological and reporting quality of systematic and rapid reviews on human mpox and their utility during a public health emergency Issue Information “Interest-holders”: A new term to replace “stakeholders” in the context of health research and policy Empowering the future of evidence-based healthcare: The Cochrane Early Career Professionals Network Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1