A systematic review on search-based test suite reduction: State-of-the-art, taxonomy, and future directions

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING IET Software Pub Date : 2023-02-20 DOI:10.1049/sfw2.12104
Amir Sohail Habib, Saif Ur Rehman Khan, Ebubeogu Amarachukwu Felix
{"title":"A systematic review on search-based test suite reduction: State-of-the-art, taxonomy, and future directions","authors":"Amir Sohail Habib,&nbsp;Saif Ur Rehman Khan,&nbsp;Ebubeogu Amarachukwu Felix","doi":"10.1049/sfw2.12104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Regression testing remains a promising research area for the last few decades. It is a type of testing that aims at ensuring that recent modifications have not adversely affected the software product. After the introduction of a new change in the system under test, the number of test cases significantly increases to handle the modification. Consequently, it becomes prohibitively expensive to execute all of the generated test cases within the allocated testing time and budget. To address this situation, the test suite reduction (TSR) technique is widely used that focusses on finding a representative test suite without compromising its effectiveness such as fault-detection capability. In this work, a systematic review study is conducted that intends to provide an unbiased viewpoint about TSR based on various types of search algorithms. The study's main objective is to examine and classify the current state-of-the-art approaches used in search-based TSR contexts. To achieve this, a systematic review protocol is adopted and, the most relevant primary studies (57 out of 210) published between 2007 and 2022 are selected. Existing search-based TSR approaches are classified into five main categories, including evolutionary-based, swarm intelligence-based, human-based, physics-based, and hybrid, grounded on the type of employed search algorithm. Moreover, the current work reports the parameter settings according to their category, the type of considered operator(s), and the probabilistic rate that significantly impacts on the quality of the obtained solution. Furthermore, this study describes the comparison baseline techniques that support the empirical comparison regarding the cost-effectiveness of a search-based TSR approach. Finally, it isconcluded that search-based TSR has great potential to optimally solve the TSR problem. In this regard, several potential research directions are outlined as useful for future researchers interested in conducting research in the TSR domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50378,"journal":{"name":"IET Software","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/sfw2.12104","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/sfw2.12104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Regression testing remains a promising research area for the last few decades. It is a type of testing that aims at ensuring that recent modifications have not adversely affected the software product. After the introduction of a new change in the system under test, the number of test cases significantly increases to handle the modification. Consequently, it becomes prohibitively expensive to execute all of the generated test cases within the allocated testing time and budget. To address this situation, the test suite reduction (TSR) technique is widely used that focusses on finding a representative test suite without compromising its effectiveness such as fault-detection capability. In this work, a systematic review study is conducted that intends to provide an unbiased viewpoint about TSR based on various types of search algorithms. The study's main objective is to examine and classify the current state-of-the-art approaches used in search-based TSR contexts. To achieve this, a systematic review protocol is adopted and, the most relevant primary studies (57 out of 210) published between 2007 and 2022 are selected. Existing search-based TSR approaches are classified into five main categories, including evolutionary-based, swarm intelligence-based, human-based, physics-based, and hybrid, grounded on the type of employed search algorithm. Moreover, the current work reports the parameter settings according to their category, the type of considered operator(s), and the probabilistic rate that significantly impacts on the quality of the obtained solution. Furthermore, this study describes the comparison baseline techniques that support the empirical comparison regarding the cost-effectiveness of a search-based TSR approach. Finally, it isconcluded that search-based TSR has great potential to optimally solve the TSR problem. In this regard, several potential research directions are outlined as useful for future researchers interested in conducting research in the TSR domain.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于搜索的测试套件缩减系统综述:最新技术、分类法和未来方向
回归测试在过去的几十年里仍然是一个很有前途的研究领域。这是一种测试类型,旨在确保最近的修改不会对软件产品产生不利影响。在被测系统中引入新的更改后,处理修改的测试用例数量显著增加。因此,在分配的测试时间和预算内执行所有生成的测试用例变得非常昂贵。为了解决这种情况,测试套件缩减(TSR)技术被广泛使用,该技术专注于在不影响其有效性(如故障检测能力)的情况下找到具有代表性的测试套件。在这项工作中,进行了一项系统的综述研究,旨在基于各种类型的搜索算法,对TSR提供一个公正的观点。该研究的主要目的是检查和分类当前在基于搜索的TSR上下文中使用的最先进的方法。为了实现这一点,采用了一个系统的审查方案,并选择了2007年至2022年间发表的最相关的初步研究(210项研究中的57项)。现有的基于搜索的TSR方法根据所使用的搜索算法类型分为五大类,包括基于进化的、基于群体智能的、基于人类的、基于物理的和混合的。此外,目前的工作根据参数设置的类别、所考虑的算子的类型以及对所获得的解决方案的质量有重大影响的概率率来报告参数设置。此外,本研究描述了支持基于搜索的TSR方法成本效益实证比较的比较基线技术。最后,研究表明,基于搜索的TSR在优化求解TSR问题方面具有很大的潜力。在这方面,概述了几个潜在的研究方向,这些方向对未来有兴趣在TSR领域进行研究的研究人员有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IET Software
IET Software 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IET Software publishes papers on all aspects of the software lifecycle, including design, development, implementation and maintenance. The focus of the journal is on the methods used to develop and maintain software, and their practical application. Authors are especially encouraged to submit papers on the following topics, although papers on all aspects of software engineering are welcome: Software and systems requirements engineering Formal methods, design methods, practice and experience Software architecture, aspect and object orientation, reuse and re-engineering Testing, verification and validation techniques Software dependability and measurement Human systems engineering and human-computer interaction Knowledge engineering; expert and knowledge-based systems, intelligent agents Information systems engineering Application of software engineering in industry and commerce Software engineering technology transfer Management of software development Theoretical aspects of software development Machine learning Big data and big code Cloud computing Current Special Issue. Call for papers: Knowledge Discovery for Software Development - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_SEN_CFP_KDSD.pdf Big Data Analytics for Sustainable Software Development - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_SEN_CFP_BDASSD.pdf
期刊最新文献
Breaking the Blockchain Trilemma: A Comprehensive Consensus Mechanism for Ensuring Security, Scalability, and Decentralization IC-GraF: An Improved Clustering with Graph-Embedding-Based Features for Software Defect Prediction IAPCP: An Effective Cross-Project Defect Prediction Model via Intra-Domain Alignment and Programming-Based Distribution Adaptation Understanding Work Rhythms in Software Development and Their Effects on Technical Performance Research and Application of Firewall Log and Intrusion Detection Log Data Visualization System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1