Automated assessment of necrosis tumor ratio in colorectal cancer using an artificial intelligence-based digital pathology analysis

Medicine Advances Pub Date : 2023-03-21 DOI:10.1002/med4.9
Huifen Ye, Yunrui Ye, Yiting Wang, Tong Tong, Su Yao, Yao Xu, Qingru Hu, Yulin Liu, Changhong Liang, Guangyi Wang, Ke Zhao, Xinjuan Fan, Yanfen Cui, Zaiyi Liu
{"title":"Automated assessment of necrosis tumor ratio in colorectal cancer using an artificial intelligence-based digital pathology analysis","authors":"Huifen Ye,&nbsp;Yunrui Ye,&nbsp;Yiting Wang,&nbsp;Tong Tong,&nbsp;Su Yao,&nbsp;Yao Xu,&nbsp;Qingru Hu,&nbsp;Yulin Liu,&nbsp;Changhong Liang,&nbsp;Guangyi Wang,&nbsp;Ke Zhao,&nbsp;Xinjuan Fan,&nbsp;Yanfen Cui,&nbsp;Zaiyi Liu","doi":"10.1002/med4.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>With the advance in digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI)-powered approaches, necrosis is proposed as a marker of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, most previous studies quantified necrosis merely as a tissue type and patch-level segmentation. Thus, it was worth exploring and validating the prognostic and predictive value of necrosis proportion with a pixel-level segmentation in large multicenter cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A semantic segmentation model was trained with 12 tissue types labeled by pathologists. Segmentation was performed using the U-net model with a subsequently derived necrosis tumor ratio (NTR). We proposed the NTR score (NTR-low or NTR-high) to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of necrosis for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the development (<i>N</i> = 443) and validation cohorts (<i>N</i> = 333) using 75% as a threshold.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The 2-category NTR was an independent prognostic factor and NTR-low was associated with significant prolonged DFS (unadjusted HR for high vs. low 1.72 [95% CI 1.19–2.49] and 1.98 [1.22–3.23] in the development and validation cohorts). Similar trends were observed for OS. The prognostic value of NTR was maintained in the multivariate analysis for both cohorts. Furthermore, a stratified analysis showed that NTR-high was a high risk with adjuvant chemotherapy for OS in stage II CRC (<i>p</i> = 0.047).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>AI-based pixel-level quantified NTR has a stable prognostic value in CRC associated with unfavorable survival. Additionally, adjuvant chemotherapy provided survival benefits for patients with a high NTR score in stage II CRC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100913,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/med4.9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/med4.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

With the advance in digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI)-powered approaches, necrosis is proposed as a marker of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, most previous studies quantified necrosis merely as a tissue type and patch-level segmentation. Thus, it was worth exploring and validating the prognostic and predictive value of necrosis proportion with a pixel-level segmentation in large multicenter cohorts.

Methods

A semantic segmentation model was trained with 12 tissue types labeled by pathologists. Segmentation was performed using the U-net model with a subsequently derived necrosis tumor ratio (NTR). We proposed the NTR score (NTR-low or NTR-high) to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of necrosis for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the development (N = 443) and validation cohorts (N = 333) using 75% as a threshold.

Results

The 2-category NTR was an independent prognostic factor and NTR-low was associated with significant prolonged DFS (unadjusted HR for high vs. low 1.72 [95% CI 1.19–2.49] and 1.98 [1.22–3.23] in the development and validation cohorts). Similar trends were observed for OS. The prognostic value of NTR was maintained in the multivariate analysis for both cohorts. Furthermore, a stratified analysis showed that NTR-high was a high risk with adjuvant chemotherapy for OS in stage II CRC (p = 0.047).

Conclusion

AI-based pixel-level quantified NTR has a stable prognostic value in CRC associated with unfavorable survival. Additionally, adjuvant chemotherapy provided survival benefits for patients with a high NTR score in stage II CRC.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人工智能的数字病理分析对癌症坏死肿瘤比率的自动评估
背景随着数字病理学和人工智能(AI)技术的发展,坏死被认为是癌症(CRC)预后不良的标志物。然而,大多数先前的研究仅将坏死量化为组织类型和斑块级别的分割。因此,在大型多中心队列中,像素级分割坏死比例的预后和预测价值值得探索和验证。方法用病理学家标记的12种组织类型训练语义分割模型。使用U-net模型进行分割,随后得出坏死肿瘤比率(NTR)。我们提出了NTR评分(NTR低或NTR高),以75%作为阈值,评估坏死对发展(N=443)和验证队列(N=333)中无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)的预后和预测价值。结果2类NTR是一个独立的预后因素,NTR低与显著延长的DFS相关(在开发和验证队列中,高与低的未调整HR分别为1.72[95%CI 1.19–2.49]和1.98[1.22–3.23])。OS也出现了类似的趋势。NTR的预后价值在两个队列的多变量分析中都保持不变。此外,分层分析显示,NTR高是II期CRC OS辅助化疗的高风险(p=0.047)。结论基于AI的像素水平量化NTR在与不良生存相关的CRC中具有稳定的预后价值。此外,辅助化疗为II期CRC NTR评分高的患者提供了生存益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Prognostic significance of ratio of positive lymph nodes in patients with operable major salivary ductal carcinoma Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic education: A comparative analysis of ChatGPT and Bing AI's Orthopaedic In-Training Examination performance Anti-synthetase syndrome complicated by multifocal tuberculosis: A thought-provoking differential diagnosis with tumors Toward bridging gaps in patient navigation: A study on the adoption of artificial intelligence technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1