Plugging the pipe? Evaluating the (null) effects of leaks on Supreme Court legitimacy

IF 1.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Journal of Empirical Legal Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-22 DOI:10.1111/jels.12362
Nathan T. Carrington, Logan Strother
{"title":"Plugging the pipe? Evaluating the (null) effects of leaks on Supreme Court legitimacy","authors":"Nathan T. Carrington,&nbsp;Logan Strother","doi":"10.1111/jels.12362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Occasionally, information about the inner workings of the Supreme Court is leaked to the press by insiders—clerks, or even justices themselves. These leaks reliably stoke controversy among commentators and academics alike who pontificate on the negative effect leaks have on the Court's institutional legitimacy. However, it is not immediately clear from existing theories whether populating the media environment with leaked information will affect public perceptions of the Court, let alone the direction of such effects. In this paper, we use an original survey combined with an original survey experiment to test the extent to which, if any, leaks influence legitimacy ascribed to the Supreme Court. Analysis shows a tightly-estimated null effect of leaks on public views on the Court.</p>","PeriodicalId":47187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","volume":"20 3","pages":"669-712"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jels.12362","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occasionally, information about the inner workings of the Supreme Court is leaked to the press by insiders—clerks, or even justices themselves. These leaks reliably stoke controversy among commentators and academics alike who pontificate on the negative effect leaks have on the Court's institutional legitimacy. However, it is not immediately clear from existing theories whether populating the media environment with leaked information will affect public perceptions of the Court, let alone the direction of such effects. In this paper, we use an original survey combined with an original survey experiment to test the extent to which, if any, leaks influence legitimacy ascribed to the Supreme Court. Analysis shows a tightly-estimated null effect of leaks on public views on the Court.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
堵塞管道?评估泄密对最高法院合法性的(无效)影响
偶尔,有关最高法院内部运作的信息会被内部人士——书记员,甚至大法官自己——泄露给媒体。这些泄密事件确实在评论员和学者中引发了争议,他们对泄密事件对法院制度合法性的负面影响发表了武断的看法。然而,从现有理论来看,目前尚不清楚在媒体环境中充斥泄露的信息是否会影响公众对法院的看法,更不用说这种影响的方向了。在本文中,我们使用原始调查与原始调查实验相结合的方法来测试泄露(如果有的话)对最高法院合法性的影响程度。分析显示,据严格估计,泄密事件对公众对法院的看法没有任何影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Impact of Judicial Leadership on Consensus Formation: Evidence From the Supreme Court of Norway Introducing a New Corpus of Definitive M&A Agreements, 2000–2020 Killing as Capital: Perverse Effects of Truce Negotiations on Gang Violence in El Salvador Patents Used in Patent Office Rejections as Indicators of Value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1