Developing transdisciplinarity in first-year engineering

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Engineering Education Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.1002/jee.20497
Gerald Tembrevilla, Susan Nesbit, Naoko Ellis, Peter Ostafichuk
{"title":"Developing transdisciplinarity in first-year engineering","authors":"Gerald Tembrevilla,&nbsp;Susan Nesbit,&nbsp;Naoko Ellis,&nbsp;Peter Ostafichuk","doi":"10.1002/jee.20497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>For engineers who aim to address sustainability challenges, participating in transdisciplinary teams is key. Yet developing transdisciplinary knowledge, including systems thinking, metacognition, and empathic thinking, is not well supported in traditional engineering programs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The extent to which selected learning activities in the introduction to engineering courses support student development of systems thinking, metacognition, and empathic thinking is investigated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design/Method</h3>\n \n <p>Focus group discussions with instructional teams and student interviews are examined to elucidate how course activities improved student transdisciplinary knowledge. Threshold concepts frame the qualitative analysis of the collected data. Implications for teaching and learning are discussed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Results suggest the investigated learning activities support student development of transdisciplinary knowledge as indicated by changes in systems thinking, metacognition, and empathic thinking. Where prior quantitative exploratory studies revealed little change in transdisciplinary knowledge indicators pre- and post-course, deeper qualitative analysis uncovers students manifested improvements in transdisciplinary knowledge indicators as narrated by the students themselves and as observed by instructors and teaching assistants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Integrating transdisciplinary knowledge development into engineering programs, starting with appropriate learning activities in first-year engineering courses, may provide new pathways for transforming curricula aimed at educating the 21st-century engineer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jee.20497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

For engineers who aim to address sustainability challenges, participating in transdisciplinary teams is key. Yet developing transdisciplinary knowledge, including systems thinking, metacognition, and empathic thinking, is not well supported in traditional engineering programs.

Purpose

The extent to which selected learning activities in the introduction to engineering courses support student development of systems thinking, metacognition, and empathic thinking is investigated.

Design/Method

Focus group discussions with instructional teams and student interviews are examined to elucidate how course activities improved student transdisciplinary knowledge. Threshold concepts frame the qualitative analysis of the collected data. Implications for teaching and learning are discussed.

Findings

Results suggest the investigated learning activities support student development of transdisciplinary knowledge as indicated by changes in systems thinking, metacognition, and empathic thinking. Where prior quantitative exploratory studies revealed little change in transdisciplinary knowledge indicators pre- and post-course, deeper qualitative analysis uncovers students manifested improvements in transdisciplinary knowledge indicators as narrated by the students themselves and as observed by instructors and teaching assistants.

Conclusions

Integrating transdisciplinary knowledge development into engineering programs, starting with appropriate learning activities in first-year engineering courses, may provide new pathways for transforming curricula aimed at educating the 21st-century engineer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一年级工程中发展跨学科
背景对于那些致力于解决可持续性挑战的工程师来说,参与跨学科团队是关键。然而,在传统的工程项目中,开发跨学科知识,包括系统思维、元认知和移情思维,并没有得到很好的支持。目的研究工程课程导论中选择的学习活动在多大程度上支持学生系统思维、元认知和移情思维的发展。设计/方法研究与教学团队的焦点小组讨论和学生访谈,以阐明课程活动如何提高学生的跨学科知识。阈值概念构成了对收集到的数据进行定性分析的框架。讨论了对教学的启示。研究结果表明,所调查的学习活动支持学生跨学科知识的发展,如系统思维、元认知和移情思维的变化。先前的定量探索性研究显示,在课程前后,跨学科知识指标几乎没有变化,而更深入的定性分析发现,学生在跨学科知识指数方面表现出了改善,这是由学生自己讲述的,也是由教师和助教观察到的。结论将跨学科知识开发纳入工程项目,从一年级工程课程的适当学习活动开始,可以为21世纪工程师教育课程的转变提供新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Education
Journal of Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) serves to cultivate, disseminate, and archive scholarly research in engineering education.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Undergraduate Engineering Mental Health Help-Seeking Instrument (UE-MH-HSI): Development and validity evidence How can I help move my manuscript smoothly through the review process? Reasons and root causes: Conventional characterizations of doctoral engineering attrition obscure underlying structural issues Special issue on systematic reviews and meta-analyses in engineering education: Highlights and future research directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1