Trivial gain of downscaling in future projections of higher trophic levels in the Nordic and Barents Seas

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES Fisheries Oceanography Pub Date : 2023-04-15 DOI:10.1111/fog.12641
Ina Nilsen, Filippa Fransner, Are Olsen, Jerry Tjiputra, Robinson Hordoir, Cecilie Hansen
{"title":"Trivial gain of downscaling in future projections of higher trophic levels in the Nordic and Barents Seas","authors":"Ina Nilsen,&nbsp;Filippa Fransner,&nbsp;Are Olsen,&nbsp;Jerry Tjiputra,&nbsp;Robinson Hordoir,&nbsp;Cecilie Hansen","doi":"10.1111/fog.12641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Downscaling physical forcing from global climate models is both time consuming and labor demanding and can delay or limit the physical forcing available for regional marine ecosystem modelers. Earlier studies have shown that downscaled physics is necessary for capturing the dynamics of primary production and lower trophic levels; however, it is not clear how higher trophic levels respond to the coarse resolution physics of global models. Here, we apply the Nordic and Barents Seas Atlantis ecosystem model (NoBa) to study the consequences of using physical forcing from global climate models versus using that from regional models. The study is therefore (i) a comparison between a regional model and its driving global model to investigate the extent to which a global climate model can be used for regional ecosystem predictions and (ii) a study of the impact of future climate change in the Nordic and Barents Seas. We found that few higher trophic level species were affected by using forcing from a global versus a regional model, and there was a general agreement in future biomass trends and distribution patterns. However, the slight difference in temperature between the models dramatically impacted Northeast Arctic cod (<i>Gadus morhua</i>), which highlights how species projection uncertainty could arise from poor physical representation of the physical forcing, in addition to uncertainty in the ecosystem model parameterization.</p>","PeriodicalId":51054,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Oceanography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fog.12641","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fog.12641","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Downscaling physical forcing from global climate models is both time consuming and labor demanding and can delay or limit the physical forcing available for regional marine ecosystem modelers. Earlier studies have shown that downscaled physics is necessary for capturing the dynamics of primary production and lower trophic levels; however, it is not clear how higher trophic levels respond to the coarse resolution physics of global models. Here, we apply the Nordic and Barents Seas Atlantis ecosystem model (NoBa) to study the consequences of using physical forcing from global climate models versus using that from regional models. The study is therefore (i) a comparison between a regional model and its driving global model to investigate the extent to which a global climate model can be used for regional ecosystem predictions and (ii) a study of the impact of future climate change in the Nordic and Barents Seas. We found that few higher trophic level species were affected by using forcing from a global versus a regional model, and there was a general agreement in future biomass trends and distribution patterns. However, the slight difference in temperature between the models dramatically impacted Northeast Arctic cod (Gadus morhua), which highlights how species projection uncertainty could arise from poor physical representation of the physical forcing, in addition to uncertainty in the ecosystem model parameterization.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北欧海和巴伦支海未来高营养级预测中缩小规模的微小收获
从全球气候模型中缩减物理强迫既耗时又费力,可能会延迟或限制区域海洋生态系统建模人员可用的物理强迫。早期的研究表明,缩小规模的物理学对于捕捉初级生产和较低营养水平的动态是必要的;然而,目前尚不清楚更高的营养水平是如何对全球模型的粗分辨率物理做出反应的。在这里,我们应用北欧和巴伦支海亚特兰蒂斯生态系统模型(NoBa)来研究使用全球气候模型的物理强迫与使用区域模型的物理强制的后果。因此,该研究(i)比较区域模型及其驱动全球模型,以调查全球气候模型在多大程度上可用于区域生态系统预测;(ii)研究未来气候变化对北欧和巴伦支海的影响。我们发现,很少有高营养级物种受到来自全球和区域模式的强迫的影响,并且在未来的生物量趋势和分布模式上达成了普遍一致。然而,两个模型之间的轻微温度差异极大地影响了东北北极鳕鱼(Gadus morhua),这突出表明,除了生态系统模型参数化的不确定性外,物种预测的不确定性可能是由于物理作用力的物理表现不佳而产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fisheries Oceanography
Fisheries Oceanography 农林科学-海洋学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>18 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal of the Japanese Society for Fisheries Oceanography, Fisheries Oceanography is designed to present a forum for the exchange of information amongst fisheries scientists worldwide. Fisheries Oceanography: presents original research articles relating the production and dynamics of fish populations to the marine environment examines entire food chains - not just single species identifies mechanisms controlling abundance explores factors affecting the recruitment and abundance of fish species and all higher marine tropic levels
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Evaluating the importance of vertical environmental variables for albacore fishing grounds in tropical Atlantic Ocean using machine learning and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) approach Climate driven response of the Iceland‐East Greenland‐Jan Mayen capelin distribution Otolith elemental composition indicates differences in the habitat use for larvae and early juveniles of Japanese jack mackerel (Trachurus japonicus) in the waters around Japan Feeding habits of splendid alfonsino Beryx splendens in the vicinity of Kuroshio, the south of Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1