Evaluation of a questionnaire to assess the indication for screening colonoscopy for asymptomatic patients.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1055/a-2181-1706
Veit Phillip, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Benjamin Walter, Roland M Schmid, Sebastian Rasch
{"title":"Evaluation of a questionnaire to assess the indication for screening colonoscopy for asymptomatic patients.","authors":"Veit Phillip, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Benjamin Walter, Roland M Schmid, Sebastian Rasch","doi":"10.1055/a-2181-1706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Screening colonoscopy is a very effective measure to prevent colorectal cancer and can reduce mortality at the population level. However, the participation rates of screening programs are low.To provide easily accessible information on screening colonoscopy and to increase the participation rates of screening programs, we developed a questionnaire for asymptomatic patients based on the German guidelines to assess the indication for screening colonoscopy. We evaluated the questionnaire with reference to the indications given by specialists in gastroenterology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who visited a specialist in gastroenterology in an outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital for other reasons than a colonoscopy were eligible for the study. A maximum of seven questions to assess the indication for screening colonoscopy were answered by the patients. Afterward, the indication for screening colonoscopy was given or not by a specialist in gastroenterology. The accuracy of the questionnaire was measured in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 335 patients were included in the analyses, of whom 50 and 285 patients were given and were not given an indication for screening colonoscopy by the specialists, respectively. In 0/50 patients, the questionnaire was false negative and in 8/285 patients false positive. Thus, the questionnaire had a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval: 93-100%), a specificity of 97% (95-99%), a negative predictive value of 100% (99-100%), and a positive predictive value of 86% (75-94%).A subgroup analysis including patients who had never had a colonoscopy (n=109) showed comparable results: sensitivity of 100% (92-100%), specificity of 92% (83-97%), negative predictive value of 100% (94-100%), and positive predictive value of 90% (87-97%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The self-assessment questionnaire for asymptomatic individuals to assess the recommendation for screening colonoscopy is very sensitive and specific compared to a specialist in gastroenterology.The questionnaire can be found at: https://www.interdisziplinaere-endoskopie.mri.tum.de/de/infos-patienten/index.php.</p>","PeriodicalId":23853,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2181-1706","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Screening colonoscopy is a very effective measure to prevent colorectal cancer and can reduce mortality at the population level. However, the participation rates of screening programs are low.To provide easily accessible information on screening colonoscopy and to increase the participation rates of screening programs, we developed a questionnaire for asymptomatic patients based on the German guidelines to assess the indication for screening colonoscopy. We evaluated the questionnaire with reference to the indications given by specialists in gastroenterology.

Methods: Patients who visited a specialist in gastroenterology in an outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital for other reasons than a colonoscopy were eligible for the study. A maximum of seven questions to assess the indication for screening colonoscopy were answered by the patients. Afterward, the indication for screening colonoscopy was given or not by a specialist in gastroenterology. The accuracy of the questionnaire was measured in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.

Results: In total, 335 patients were included in the analyses, of whom 50 and 285 patients were given and were not given an indication for screening colonoscopy by the specialists, respectively. In 0/50 patients, the questionnaire was false negative and in 8/285 patients false positive. Thus, the questionnaire had a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval: 93-100%), a specificity of 97% (95-99%), a negative predictive value of 100% (99-100%), and a positive predictive value of 86% (75-94%).A subgroup analysis including patients who had never had a colonoscopy (n=109) showed comparable results: sensitivity of 100% (92-100%), specificity of 92% (83-97%), negative predictive value of 100% (94-100%), and positive predictive value of 90% (87-97%).

Conclusion: The self-assessment questionnaire for asymptomatic individuals to assess the recommendation for screening colonoscopy is very sensitive and specific compared to a specialist in gastroenterology.The questionnaire can be found at: https://www.interdisziplinaere-endoskopie.mri.tum.de/de/infos-patienten/index.php.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估无症状患者结肠镜筛查指征的问卷调查。
简介:癌症是全球癌症死亡的第二大常见原因。筛查结肠镜检查是预防癌症的一项非常有效的措施,可以降低人群的死亡率。然而,筛查项目的参与率很低。为了提供易于获取的结肠镜筛查信息,并提高筛查项目的参与率,我们根据德国指南为无症状患者编制了一份问卷,以评估结肠镜筛查的适应症。我们参考胃肠病专家给出的适应症对问卷进行了评估。方法:因结肠镜检查以外的其他原因就诊于三级医院门诊胃肠病专家的患者符合研究条件。患者回答了最多七个问题来评估筛查结肠镜检查的适应症。之后,胃肠病专家给出了筛查结肠镜检查的指征。问卷的准确性是根据敏感性、特异性和预测值来衡量的。结果:总共有335名患者被纳入分析,其中50名患者和285名患者分别接受了专家的结肠镜检查,但没有接受专家的检查。在0/50名患者中,问卷为假阴性,在8/285名患者中为假阳性。因此,该问卷的敏感性为100%(95%置信区间:93-100%),特异性为97%(95-99%),阴性预测值为100%(99-100%),阳性预测值为86%(75-94%)。包括从未做过结肠镜检查的患者(n=109)在内的亚组分析显示了可比较的结果:敏感性为100%(92-100%),特异性为92%(83-97%),阴性预测值为100%(94-100%),阳性预测值为90%(87-97%)。结论:与胃肠病专家相比,无症状个体的自我评估问卷评估结肠镜筛查的建议是非常敏感和具体的。问卷可在以下网址找到:https://www.interdisziplinaere-endoskopie.mri.tum.de/de/infos-patienten/index.php.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie
Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
562
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie ist seit über 50 Jahren die führende deutsche Fachzeitschrift auf dem Gebiet der Gastroenterologie. Sie richtet sich an Gastroenterologen und alle anderen gastroenterologisch interessierten Ärzte. Als offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten sowie der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie informiert sie zuverlässig und aktuell über die wichtigen Neuerungen und Entwicklungen in der Gastroenterologie.
期刊最新文献
Konservative versus chirurgische Therapie beim idiopathischen und sekundären Megakolon oder Megarektum im Erwachsenenalter - eine retrospektive multizentrische Kontrollstudie. Hemosuccus pancreaticus - Multidisciplinary therapy for a splenic artery aneurysm, ruptured into the pancreatic duct. Sub-optimal therapy of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in the real-life stetting of the German PBC cohort. Remission of refractory esophageal lichen planus induced by tofacitinib. [Management of gastroparesis care in Germany - a survey by the working group of guiding gastroenterologic clinicians (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Gastroenterologischer Krankenhausärzte, ALGK)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1