Is the Health of Older Americans With a GED Equivalent to Their Peers With a High School Diploma?

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY International Journal of Aging & Human Development Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1177/00914150231208685
Esme Fuller-Thomson, Robin Grossman, Andie MacNeil
{"title":"Is the Health of Older Americans With a GED Equivalent to Their Peers With a High School Diploma?","authors":"Esme Fuller-Thomson, Robin Grossman, Andie MacNeil","doi":"10.1177/00914150231208685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to identify differences in the prevalence and odds of cognitive impairment, hearing impairment, vision impairment, limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs), and ambulation limitations among three groups of older American adults: high school dropouts, General Educational Development (GED) recipients, and high school graduates. This study used secondary analysis of the nationally representative 2017 American Community Survey. The sample included 20,489 GED recipients, 154,892 high school graduates, and 49,912 high school dropouts. Our findings indicate that there is a gradient in health outcomes among older Americans, with the highest prevalence and odds of cognitive impairment, hearing impairment, vision impairment, ADL limitations, and ambulation limitations among high school dropouts, followed by GED recipients, and the lowest among high school graduates. Although GED recipients have better health outcomes than high school dropouts, there is still a significant disparity in health status between GED recipients and high school graduates.</p>","PeriodicalId":47878,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Aging & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":"47-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Aging & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00914150231208685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify differences in the prevalence and odds of cognitive impairment, hearing impairment, vision impairment, limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs), and ambulation limitations among three groups of older American adults: high school dropouts, General Educational Development (GED) recipients, and high school graduates. This study used secondary analysis of the nationally representative 2017 American Community Survey. The sample included 20,489 GED recipients, 154,892 high school graduates, and 49,912 high school dropouts. Our findings indicate that there is a gradient in health outcomes among older Americans, with the highest prevalence and odds of cognitive impairment, hearing impairment, vision impairment, ADL limitations, and ambulation limitations among high school dropouts, followed by GED recipients, and the lowest among high school graduates. Although GED recipients have better health outcomes than high school dropouts, there is still a significant disparity in health status between GED recipients and high school graduates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拥有普通教育文凭的美国老年人的健康状况与拥有高中文凭的同龄人相当吗?
这项研究的目的是确定三组美国老年人(高中辍学者、普通教育发展(GED)接受者和高中毕业生)在认知障碍、听力障碍、视力障碍、日常生活活动受限(ADL)和行动受限的患病率和几率方面的差异。这项研究使用了对具有全国代表性的2017年美国社区调查的二次分析。样本包括20489名GED获得者、154892名高中毕业生和49912名高中辍学者。我们的研究结果表明,美国老年人的健康状况存在梯度,高中辍学者中认知障碍、听力障碍、视力障碍、ADL限制和行动受限的患病率和几率最高,其次是GED获得者,高中毕业生中最低。尽管GED接受者的健康状况比高中辍学者好,但GED接受者和高中毕业生之间的健康状况仍然存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: These are some of the broad questions with which the International Journal of Aging and Human Development is concerned. Emphasis is upon psychological and social studies of aging and the aged. However, the Journal also publishes research that introduces observations from other fields that illuminate the "human" side of gerontology, or utilizes gerontological observations to illuminate in other fields.
期刊最新文献
The Design and Early Results of a Structured Longitudinal Training Program for Undergraduate Students to Increase Diversity in Aging-Research. Comorbid Conditions Are Associated With Cognitive Impairment in Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders. Planning for Program Evaluation Improves Implementation and Assessment. Examining the Impact of Far-Infrared Technology on Quality of Life in Older Adults. Recruitment Barriers and Potential Strategies for Inclusion of Older Asian Americans in Alzheimer's Disease Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1