The Joys and Stresses of Social Relationships and the Effect on Resiliency During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A National Survey of U.S. Older Adults.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnad141
Ashly C Westrick, Lindsay C Kobayashi, Matthias Kirch, Dianne Singer, Preeti N Malani, Jeffrey T Kullgren, Erica Solway, Jessica M Finlay
{"title":"The Joys and Stresses of Social Relationships and the Effect on Resiliency During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A National Survey of U.S. Older Adults.","authors":"Ashly C Westrick, Lindsay C Kobayashi, Matthias Kirch, Dianne Singer, Preeti N Malani, Jeffrey T Kullgren, Erica Solway, Jessica M Finlay","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnad141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic placed unprecedented stress on older adults. Resiliency could mitigate deleterious effects of pandemic stressors. We described trends in resilience among U.S. adults aged 50-80 years approximately one and a half years after the onset of the pandemic, compared with before the pandemic, and evaluated associations between relationships and resilience.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data were from the National Poll on Healthy Aging (N = 2,100) in August 2021. Respondents rated their resiliency as compared with before the pandemic (more, about the same, or less) and different types of relationships (spouse/partner, friends, and neighbors) as sources of joy and/or stress during the pandemic (a lot, some, very little, and not at all). Multinomial logistic regressions (complete-case analysis) estimated the relationships between each joyful and stressful relationships and resiliency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants reported feeling as resilient as before the pandemic (70.6%) with 14.5% feeling less resilient. More women than men felt less resilient than before the pandemic (16.7% vs 12.8%, p = .006). Feeling a lot of stress from one's spouse or neighbors was associated with increased likelihood of feeling less resilient than before the pandemic (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8, 7.7 and OR = 4.5; 95% CI: 1.5, 13.9, respectively), which was stronger among women (OR = 15.1; 95% CI: 4.8, 45.6) than men (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.4, 2.7).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Social relationships may have been more important for women than for men in supporting resiliency during the pandemic. Understanding patterns of resiliency can help to inform policymaking and support the well-being of older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnad141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic placed unprecedented stress on older adults. Resiliency could mitigate deleterious effects of pandemic stressors. We described trends in resilience among U.S. adults aged 50-80 years approximately one and a half years after the onset of the pandemic, compared with before the pandemic, and evaluated associations between relationships and resilience.

Research design and methods: Data were from the National Poll on Healthy Aging (N = 2,100) in August 2021. Respondents rated their resiliency as compared with before the pandemic (more, about the same, or less) and different types of relationships (spouse/partner, friends, and neighbors) as sources of joy and/or stress during the pandemic (a lot, some, very little, and not at all). Multinomial logistic regressions (complete-case analysis) estimated the relationships between each joyful and stressful relationships and resiliency.

Results: Most participants reported feeling as resilient as before the pandemic (70.6%) with 14.5% feeling less resilient. More women than men felt less resilient than before the pandemic (16.7% vs 12.8%, p = .006). Feeling a lot of stress from one's spouse or neighbors was associated with increased likelihood of feeling less resilient than before the pandemic (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8, 7.7 and OR = 4.5; 95% CI: 1.5, 13.9, respectively), which was stronger among women (OR = 15.1; 95% CI: 4.8, 45.6) than men (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.4, 2.7).

Discussion and implications: Social relationships may have been more important for women than for men in supporting resiliency during the pandemic. Understanding patterns of resiliency can help to inform policymaking and support the well-being of older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间社会关系的欢乐和压力及其对恢复力的影响:一项针对美国老年人的全国调查。
背景和目标:新冠肺炎大流行给老年人带来了前所未有的压力。复原力可以减轻流行病压力源的有害影响。我们描述了与疫情前相比,在疫情爆发约一年半后,50-80岁的美国成年人的复原力趋势,并评估了关系与复原力之间的关系。研究设计和方法:数据来自2021年8月的全国健康老龄化民意调查(N=2100)。受访者将他们与疫情前相比的弹性(更多、大致相同或更少)和不同类型的关系(配偶/伴侣、朋友、邻居)评为疫情期间的快乐和/或压力来源(很多、一些、很少,甚至根本没有)。多项逻辑回归(完整案例分析)估计了每种快乐和压力关系与弹性之间的关系。结果:大多数参与者报告说,他们感觉和疫情前一样有韧性(70.6%),14.5%的人感觉没有那么有韧性。女性比男性更有韧性(16.7%对12.8%,p=0.006)。感受到来自配偶或邻居的巨大压力与感觉韧性比疫情前低的可能性增加有关(or=3.7;95%CI:1.8、7.7和or=4.5;95%CI:1.5、13.9),女性比男性更强(or=15.1;95%CI:4.8、45.6)(OR=1.03;95%置信区间:0.4,2.7)。讨论和影响:在疫情期间,社会关系对女性的支持可能比男性更重要。了解弹性模式有助于为决策提供信息,并支持老年人的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog) in Taiwanese older adults. Diversity and 'successful ageing': exploring intersectional and existential dimensions to ageing well. Influence of birthplace and age at migration on cognitive aging among Hispanic/Latino populations in the U.S.: Study of Latinos-Investigation of Neurocognitive Aging (SOL-INCA). Intergenerational Relationships and Family Support: Implications for Health and Wellbeing. Characteristics and healthcare utilization among aging veterans in supported housing: A comparison with independently housed age-matched veterans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1