Intravenous Vitamin C for Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: Two Harmonized Randomized Clinical Trials.

IF 63.1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1001/jama.2023.21407
Neill K J Adhikari, Madiha Hashmi, Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Rashan Haniffa, Abi Beane, Steve A Webb, Derek C Angus, Anthony C Gordon, Deborah J Cook, Gordon H Guyatt, Lindsay R Berry, Elizabeth Lorenzi, Paul R Mouncey, Carly Au, Ruxandra Pinto, Julie Ménard, Sheila Sprague, Marie-Hélène Masse, David T Huang, Daren K Heyland, Alistair D Nichol, Colin J McArthur, Angelique de Man, Farah Al-Beidh, Djillali Annane, Matthew Anstey, Yaseen M Arabi, Marie-Claude Battista, Scott Berry, Zahra Bhimani, Marc J M Bonten, Charlotte A Bradbury, Emily B Brant, Frank M Brunkhorst, Aidan Burrell, Meredith Buxton, Maurizio Cecconi, Allen C Cheng, Dian Cohen, Matthew E Cove, Andrew G Day, Lennie P G Derde, Michelle A Detry, Lise J Estcourt, Elizabeth O Fagbodun, Mark Fitzgerald, Herman Goossens, Cameron Green, Alisa M Higgins, Thomas E Hills, Christopher Horvat, Nao Ichihara, Devachandran Jayakumar, Salmaan Kanji, Muhammad Nasir Khoso, Patrick R Lawler, Roger J Lewis, Edward Litton, John C Marshall, Daniel F McAuley, Anna McGlothlin, Shay P McGuinness, Zoe K McQuilten, Bryan J McVerry, Srinivas Murthy, Rachael L Parke, Jane C Parker, Luis Felipe Reyes, Kathryn M Rowan, Hiroki Saito, Nawal Salahuddin, Marlene S Santos, Christina T Saunders, Christopher W Seymour, Manu Shankar-Hari, Timo Tolppa, Tony Trapani, Alexis F Turgeon, Anne M Turner, Andrew A Udy, Frank L van de Veerdonk, Ryan Zarychanski, François Lamontagne
{"title":"Intravenous Vitamin C for Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: Two Harmonized Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Neill K J Adhikari, Madiha Hashmi, Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Rashan Haniffa, Abi Beane, Steve A Webb, Derek C Angus, Anthony C Gordon, Deborah J Cook, Gordon H Guyatt, Lindsay R Berry, Elizabeth Lorenzi, Paul R Mouncey, Carly Au, Ruxandra Pinto, Julie Ménard, Sheila Sprague, Marie-Hélène Masse, David T Huang, Daren K Heyland, Alistair D Nichol, Colin J McArthur, Angelique de Man, Farah Al-Beidh, Djillali Annane, Matthew Anstey, Yaseen M Arabi, Marie-Claude Battista, Scott Berry, Zahra Bhimani, Marc J M Bonten, Charlotte A Bradbury, Emily B Brant, Frank M Brunkhorst, Aidan Burrell, Meredith Buxton, Maurizio Cecconi, Allen C Cheng, Dian Cohen, Matthew E Cove, Andrew G Day, Lennie P G Derde, Michelle A Detry, Lise J Estcourt, Elizabeth O Fagbodun, Mark Fitzgerald, Herman Goossens, Cameron Green, Alisa M Higgins, Thomas E Hills, Christopher Horvat, Nao Ichihara, Devachandran Jayakumar, Salmaan Kanji, Muhammad Nasir Khoso, Patrick R Lawler, Roger J Lewis, Edward Litton, John C Marshall, Daniel F McAuley, Anna McGlothlin, Shay P McGuinness, Zoe K McQuilten, Bryan J McVerry, Srinivas Murthy, Rachael L Parke, Jane C Parker, Luis Felipe Reyes, Kathryn M Rowan, Hiroki Saito, Nawal Salahuddin, Marlene S Santos, Christina T Saunders, Christopher W Seymour, Manu Shankar-Hari, Timo Tolppa, Tony Trapani, Alexis F Turgeon, Anne M Turner, Andrew A Udy, Frank L van de Veerdonk, Ryan Zarychanski, François Lamontagne","doi":"10.1001/jama.2023.21407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The efficacy of vitamin C for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether vitamin C improves outcomes for patients with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Two prospectively harmonized randomized clinical trials enrolled critically ill patients receiving organ support in intensive care units (90 sites) and patients who were not critically ill (40 sites) between July 23, 2020, and July 15, 2022, on 4 continents.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized to receive vitamin C administered intravenously or control (placebo or no vitamin C) every 6 hours for 96 hours (maximum of 16 doses).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was a composite of organ support-free days defined as days alive and free of respiratory and cardiovascular organ support in the intensive care unit up to day 21 and survival to hospital discharge. Values ranged from -1 organ support-free days for patients experiencing in-hospital death to 22 organ support-free days for those who survived without needing organ support. The primary analysis used a bayesian cumulative logistic model. An odds ratio (OR) greater than 1 represented efficacy (improved survival, more organ support-free days, or both), an OR less than 1 represented harm, and an OR less than 1.2 represented futility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enrollment was terminated after statistical triggers for harm and futility were met. The trials had primary outcome data for 1568 critically ill patients (1037 in the vitamin C group and 531 in the control group; median age, 60 years [IQR, 50-70 years]; 35.9% were female) and 1022 patients who were not critically ill (456 in the vitamin C group and 566 in the control group; median age, 62 years [IQR, 51-72 years]; 39.6% were female). Among critically ill patients, the median number of organ support-free days was 7 (IQR, -1 to 17 days) for the vitamin C group vs 10 (IQR, -1 to 17 days) for the control group (adjusted proportional OR, 0.88 [95% credible interval {CrI}, 0.73 to 1.06]) and the posterior probabilities were 8.6% (efficacy), 91.4% (harm), and 99.9% (futility). Among patients who were not critically ill, the median number of organ support-free days was 22 (IQR, 18 to 22 days) for the vitamin C group vs 22 (IQR, 21 to 22 days) for the control group (adjusted proportional OR, 0.80 [95% CrI, 0.60 to 1.01]) and the posterior probabilities were 2.9% (efficacy), 97.1% (harm), and greater than 99.9% (futility). Among critically ill patients, survival to hospital discharge was 61.9% (642/1037) for the vitamin C group vs 64.6% (343/531) for the control group (adjusted OR, 0.92 [95% CrI, 0.73 to 1.17]) and the posterior probability was 24.0% for efficacy. Among patients who were not critically ill, survival to hospital discharge was 85.1% (388/456) for the vitamin C group vs 86.6% (490/566) for the control group (adjusted OR, 0.86 [95% CrI, 0.61 to 1.17]) and the posterior probability was 17.8% for efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In hospitalized patients with COVID-19, vitamin C had low probability of improving the primary composite outcome of organ support-free days and hospital survival.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04401150 (LOVIT-COVID) and NCT02735707 (REMAP-CAP).</p>","PeriodicalId":54909,"journal":{"name":"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1745-1759"},"PeriodicalIF":63.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.21407","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The efficacy of vitamin C for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is uncertain.

Objective: To determine whether vitamin C improves outcomes for patients with COVID-19.

Design, setting, and participants: Two prospectively harmonized randomized clinical trials enrolled critically ill patients receiving organ support in intensive care units (90 sites) and patients who were not critically ill (40 sites) between July 23, 2020, and July 15, 2022, on 4 continents.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive vitamin C administered intravenously or control (placebo or no vitamin C) every 6 hours for 96 hours (maximum of 16 doses).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was a composite of organ support-free days defined as days alive and free of respiratory and cardiovascular organ support in the intensive care unit up to day 21 and survival to hospital discharge. Values ranged from -1 organ support-free days for patients experiencing in-hospital death to 22 organ support-free days for those who survived without needing organ support. The primary analysis used a bayesian cumulative logistic model. An odds ratio (OR) greater than 1 represented efficacy (improved survival, more organ support-free days, or both), an OR less than 1 represented harm, and an OR less than 1.2 represented futility.

Results: Enrollment was terminated after statistical triggers for harm and futility were met. The trials had primary outcome data for 1568 critically ill patients (1037 in the vitamin C group and 531 in the control group; median age, 60 years [IQR, 50-70 years]; 35.9% were female) and 1022 patients who were not critically ill (456 in the vitamin C group and 566 in the control group; median age, 62 years [IQR, 51-72 years]; 39.6% were female). Among critically ill patients, the median number of organ support-free days was 7 (IQR, -1 to 17 days) for the vitamin C group vs 10 (IQR, -1 to 17 days) for the control group (adjusted proportional OR, 0.88 [95% credible interval {CrI}, 0.73 to 1.06]) and the posterior probabilities were 8.6% (efficacy), 91.4% (harm), and 99.9% (futility). Among patients who were not critically ill, the median number of organ support-free days was 22 (IQR, 18 to 22 days) for the vitamin C group vs 22 (IQR, 21 to 22 days) for the control group (adjusted proportional OR, 0.80 [95% CrI, 0.60 to 1.01]) and the posterior probabilities were 2.9% (efficacy), 97.1% (harm), and greater than 99.9% (futility). Among critically ill patients, survival to hospital discharge was 61.9% (642/1037) for the vitamin C group vs 64.6% (343/531) for the control group (adjusted OR, 0.92 [95% CrI, 0.73 to 1.17]) and the posterior probability was 24.0% for efficacy. Among patients who were not critically ill, survival to hospital discharge was 85.1% (388/456) for the vitamin C group vs 86.6% (490/566) for the control group (adjusted OR, 0.86 [95% CrI, 0.61 to 1.17]) and the posterior probability was 17.8% for efficacy.

Conclusions and relevance: In hospitalized patients with COVID-19, vitamin C had low probability of improving the primary composite outcome of organ support-free days and hospital survival.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04401150 (LOVIT-COVID) and NCT02735707 (REMAP-CAP).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19住院患者静脉注射维生素C:两项协调随机临床试验
重要性:维生素C对新冠肺炎住院患者的疗效尚不确定。目的:确定维生素C是否能改善COVID-19患者的预后。设计、设置和参与者:两项前瞻性协调随机临床试验纳入了2020年7月23日至2022年7月15日期间在4大洲接受重症监护室器官支持的危重患者(90个地点)和非危重患者(40个地点)。干预措施:患者被随机分组,每6小时接受一次静脉注射或对照(安慰剂或无维生素C),持续96小时(最多16剂)出院。数值范围从住院死亡患者的-1天无器官支持日到无需器官支持存活患者的22天无器官支撑日。主要分析使用了贝叶斯累积逻辑模型。比值比(OR)大于1表示疗效(生存率提高、无器官支持天数增加或两者兼有),比值比小于1表示危害,比值比低于1.2表示无效。结果:在达到伤害和无效的统计触发因素后,终止了招募。该试验有1568名危重症患者(维生素C组1037人,对照组531人;中位年龄60岁[IQR,50-70岁];35.9%为女性)和1022名非危重症患者的主要结果数据(维生素C小组456人,对照小组566人,中位年龄62岁[IQR,51-72岁];39.6%为女性)。在危重患者中,维生素C组无器官支持的中位天数为7天(IQR,-1至17天),对照组为10天(IQR,-1至17d)(调整比例OR,0.88[95%可信区间{CrI},0.73至1.06]),后验概率为8.6%(有效)、91.4%(危害)和99.9%(无效)。在非危重患者中,维生素C组无器官支持的中位天数为22天(IQR,18-22天),对照组为22天)(调整后的比例OR,0.80[95%CrI,0.60-1.01]),后验概率为2.9%(有效)、97.1%(危害)和大于99.9%(无效)。在危重患者中,维生素C组的出院生存率为61.9%(642/1037),对照组为64.6%(343/531)(校正OR,0.92[95%CrI,0.73-1.17]),疗效的后验概率为24.0%。在非危重患者中,维生素C组的出院生存率为85.1%(388/456),对照组为86.6%(490/566)(校正OR,0.86[95%CrI,0.61-1.17]),疗效的后验概率为17.8%。结论和相关性:在新冠肺炎住院患者中,维生素C改善无器官支持天数和住院生存率的主要综合结果的概率较低。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04401150(LOVIT-COVID)和NCT02735707(REMAP-CAP)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
48.20
自引率
0.90%
发文量
1569
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) is an international peer-reviewed general medical journal. It has been published continuously since 1883. JAMA is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Active Surveillance or Watchful Waiting for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer, 2010-2020. Ensuring Virtual Vigilance in Decentralized Clinical Trials. Hypertension Risk and Kidney Function Following Kidney Donation. Hypertension Risk and Kidney Function Following Kidney Donation. Hypertension Risk and Kidney Function Following Kidney Donation-Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1