Inferior Alveolar Plus Buccal Nerve Block Decreases Postoperative Pain Scores at Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvest Site: A Retrospective Analysis.

IF 1.1 0 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology research & practice Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.5152/tud.2023.23080
Vivek Tarigopula, Swarnendu Mandal, Gorrepati Rohith, Abhay S Gaur, Manoj K Das
{"title":"Inferior Alveolar Plus Buccal Nerve Block Decreases Postoperative Pain Scores at Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvest Site: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Vivek Tarigopula, Swarnendu Mandal, Gorrepati Rohith, Abhay S Gaur, Manoj K Das","doi":"10.5152/tud.2023.23080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Postoperative pain at buccal mucosal graft (BMG) harvest site hinders the resumption of food intake. We aim to study the effect of inferior-alveolar nerve block plus buccal nerve block (IANB+BNB) on pain scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective case-control study performed in a single center from July 2021 to July 2022 (ethics committee approval: T/IM-NF/Urology/23/27). We performed IANB+BNB with a mixture of 5 mL each of 1% lignocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone, in addition to local infiltration of 2% lignocaine and (1:100000) epinephrine combination before harvesting BMG. We retrospectively compared the recorded postoperative pain scores using the visual analog scale (VAS) among patients who received and did not receive IANB+BNB. The time for resumption of pain-free diets and postoperative analgesic requirements was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study groups included 20 patients each and were similar in age and graft size. The VAS scores at 0 hours [1.0 (1.25) vs. 2.5 (3.5); P= .043], 6 hours [2.40 (± 0.69) vs. 4.60 (± 0.97); P= .008], 12 hours [2.50 (± 0.97) vs. 4.80 (± 0.92); P= .008], and 24 hours [3.0 (1.25) vs. 4.5 (1.25); P= .002] were better in the intervention arm. However, the pain beyond the second day was similar. The IANB+BNB group resumed solid food quicker, and the cumulative paracetamol dose required was less [8.9 (± 3.03) vs. 16.2 (± 5.06) g; P= .001]. Fewer patients required opioids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who received IANB+BNB had better pain scores during the first 24 hours following surgery and tolerated solid diet quicker.</p>","PeriodicalId":101337,"journal":{"name":"Urology research & practice","volume":"49 5","pages":"329-333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology research & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.23080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Postoperative pain at buccal mucosal graft (BMG) harvest site hinders the resumption of food intake. We aim to study the effect of inferior-alveolar nerve block plus buccal nerve block (IANB+BNB) on pain scores.

Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study performed in a single center from July 2021 to July 2022 (ethics committee approval: T/IM-NF/Urology/23/27). We performed IANB+BNB with a mixture of 5 mL each of 1% lignocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone, in addition to local infiltration of 2% lignocaine and (1:100000) epinephrine combination before harvesting BMG. We retrospectively compared the recorded postoperative pain scores using the visual analog scale (VAS) among patients who received and did not receive IANB+BNB. The time for resumption of pain-free diets and postoperative analgesic requirements was compared.

Results: The study groups included 20 patients each and were similar in age and graft size. The VAS scores at 0 hours [1.0 (1.25) vs. 2.5 (3.5); P= .043], 6 hours [2.40 (± 0.69) vs. 4.60 (± 0.97); P= .008], 12 hours [2.50 (± 0.97) vs. 4.80 (± 0.92); P= .008], and 24 hours [3.0 (1.25) vs. 4.5 (1.25); P= .002] were better in the intervention arm. However, the pain beyond the second day was similar. The IANB+BNB group resumed solid food quicker, and the cumulative paracetamol dose required was less [8.9 (± 3.03) vs. 16.2 (± 5.06) g; P= .001]. Fewer patients required opioids.

Conclusion: Patients who received IANB+BNB had better pain scores during the first 24 hours following surgery and tolerated solid diet quicker.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下牙槽加颊神经阻滞可降低颊粘膜移植术后疼痛评分:回顾性分析。
目的:颊粘膜移植物(BMG)收获部位的术后疼痛阻碍了食物摄入的恢复。我们的目的是研究下牙槽神经阻滞加颊神经阻滞(IANB+BNB)对疼痛评分的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,于2021年7月至2022年7月在一个中心进行(伦理委员会批准:T/IM-NF/Urology/23/27)。在收获BMG之前,我们使用1%利多卡因、0.25%布比卡因和4mg地塞米松各5mL的混合物进行IANB+BNB,以及2%利多卡因和(1:100000)肾上腺素组合的局部渗透。我们使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对接受和未接受IANB+BNB的患者的术后疼痛评分进行了回顾性比较。比较恢复无疼痛饮食的时间和术后镇痛需求。结果:研究组各包括20名患者,年龄和移植物大小相似。在干预组中,0小时[1.0(1.25)vs.2.5(3.5);P=.043]、6小时[2.40(±0.69)vs.4.60(±0.97);P=.008]、12小时[2.50(±0.97%)vs.4.80(±092);P=0.008]和24小时[3.0(1.25vs.4.5(1.25);P=0.002]的VAS评分更好。然而,第二天之后的疼痛情况类似。IANB+BNB组恢复固体食物的速度更快,所需的扑热息痛累积剂量更少[8.9(±3.03)vs.16.2(±5.06)g;P=0.001]。需要阿片类药物的患者更少。结论:接受IANB+BNB的患者在手术后的前24小时内疼痛评分更好,对固体饮食的耐受性更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Outcomes of Open Simple Prostatectomy in Men with or Without Prior History of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. Diagnosing Dysfunctional Voiding Non-Invasively: The SHADE Criteria Approach. Erratum. Genitourinary Tuberculosis and the Potential Impact of Delayed Diagnosis in Europe. Histotopographic Reasons for Ventral Approach in Bulbous Non-Transecting Urethroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1