Physiotherapy in Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

0 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology research & practice Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.5152/tud.2023.23018
Fariba Ghaderi, Ghazal Kharaji, Sakineh Hajebrahimi, Fariba Pashazadeh, Bary Berghmans, Hanieh Salehi Pourmehr
{"title":"Physiotherapy in Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Fariba Ghaderi, Ghazal Kharaji, Sakineh Hajebrahimi, Fariba Pashazadeh, Bary Berghmans, Hanieh Salehi Pourmehr","doi":"10.5152/tud.2023.23018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physiotherapy is the most commonly used treatment for stress urinary incontinence including pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback, and electrical stimulation. This systematic review evaluated the effects of physiotherapy in patients with stress urinary incontinence compared with no treatment, placebo, sham, surgery, or other inactive control treatments. MEDLINE (via PubMed), The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, PEDro, and Trip Database were explored using applicable vocabularies for all English and Persian language investigations released from inception to January 2021. On one side, trials including physiotherapy of pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback, and electrical stimulation and on the other, either no treatment, placebo, sham, surgery, or other inactive control treatments were included. Studies were assessed for appropriateness and methodological excellence. Two authors extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by a third opinion. Data were processed as described in the Joanna Briggs Institute Handbook. Twenty-nine trials with 2601 participants were found, but only 16 were included because of data heterogeneity. The results showed that physiotherapy interventions are better than no treatment in terms of urine leakage, but no difference was found for urinary incontinence severity. Also, physiotherapy showed favorable results over comparison groups for International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire, pad test, pelvic floor muscle function, and improvement outcomes. This systematic review supports the widespread use of pelvic physiotherapy as the first-line treatment for adult patients with stress urinary incontinence.</p>","PeriodicalId":101337,"journal":{"name":"Urology research & practice","volume":"49 5","pages":"293-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology research & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.23018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physiotherapy is the most commonly used treatment for stress urinary incontinence including pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback, and electrical stimulation. This systematic review evaluated the effects of physiotherapy in patients with stress urinary incontinence compared with no treatment, placebo, sham, surgery, or other inactive control treatments. MEDLINE (via PubMed), The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, PEDro, and Trip Database were explored using applicable vocabularies for all English and Persian language investigations released from inception to January 2021. On one side, trials including physiotherapy of pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback, and electrical stimulation and on the other, either no treatment, placebo, sham, surgery, or other inactive control treatments were included. Studies were assessed for appropriateness and methodological excellence. Two authors extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by a third opinion. Data were processed as described in the Joanna Briggs Institute Handbook. Twenty-nine trials with 2601 participants were found, but only 16 were included because of data heterogeneity. The results showed that physiotherapy interventions are better than no treatment in terms of urine leakage, but no difference was found for urinary incontinence severity. Also, physiotherapy showed favorable results over comparison groups for International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire, pad test, pelvic floor muscle function, and improvement outcomes. This systematic review supports the widespread use of pelvic physiotherapy as the first-line treatment for adult patients with stress urinary incontinence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
压力性尿失禁患者的物理治疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
物理疗法是治疗压力性尿失禁最常用的方法,包括盆底肌肉训练、生物反馈和电刺激。这项系统综述评估了物理治疗对压力性尿失禁患者的影响,与未治疗、安慰剂、假手术、手术或其他非活动对照治疗相比。MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、Cochrane图书馆(CENTRAL)、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、PEDro和Trip数据库使用适用于从开始到2021年1月发布的所有英语和波斯语调查的词汇进行了探索。一方面,试验包括盆底肌肉训练的物理疗法、生物反馈和电刺激,另一方面,不包括任何治疗、安慰剂、假手术、手术或其他非活动对照治疗。对研究的适当性和方法的卓越性进行了评估。两位作者提取了数据。第三种意见解决了分歧。数据按照乔安娜·布里格斯研究所手册中的描述进行处理。共发现了29项2601名参与者的试验,但由于数据的异质性,只有16项被纳入。结果表明,就尿失禁而言,物理治疗干预比不治疗要好,但对尿失禁的严重程度没有发现差异。此外,在国际失禁咨询问卷、衬垫测试、盆底肌肉功能和改善结果方面,物理治疗显示出优于对照组的结果。这篇系统综述支持广泛使用骨盆理疗作为成年压力性尿失禁患者的一线治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Value of TGF-β Expression in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Reporting and Grading of Complications in Urological Surgery: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. "Minho Technique" for Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit. A New Sperm Concentration Threshold for Y Chromosome Microdeletion Analysis in Infertile Men: Could It Be Azoopermia? Hounsfield Unit on Preoperative Computed Tomography as an Indicator of Prognosis in Patients with Liposarcoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1