Physician Assistant Gender Differences in Research, Professional Goals, and Perceptions of Support.

Q2 Health Professions Journal of Physician Assistant Education Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1097/JPA.0000000000000551
Sara Lolar, Robert D Welch, Alexandria Garino
{"title":"Physician Assistant Gender Differences in Research, Professional Goals, and Perceptions of Support.","authors":"Sara Lolar, Robert D Welch, Alexandria Garino","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The majority of Physician assistant (PA) educators are women, yet men proportionately publish more and advance further in academic rank. This study examined if research interest, promotion goals, and perceptions of institutional support differed between PA educators with different gender identities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a subset analysis of a previously published cross-sectional study. PA programs were stratified by region and Carnegie classification and were sampled by a stratified random sampling method. PA faculty from selected programs were invited to participate in an anonymous survey. Data were analyzed to account for the stratified sample design. Means and proportions with associated 95% confidence intervals are described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a 51% response rate (N = 110). Sixty-three percent of respondents identified as female and 36% as male. Men had a mean of 5.67 (0.17, 11.16) career research articles and women had 1.56 (0.68, 2.44) articles. Fifteen percent (3.7%, 26.3%) of men were full professor compared to 4.3% (0, 9.1%) of women. When transitioning to a faculty role, 72.5% (58.4%, 86.6%) of men and 52.9% (41%, 64.7%) of women felt supported by their institution. Both genders valued promotion, but 80% (67.6%, 92.4%) of men reported having clear 5-year goals compared to 58.8% (46.6%, 71%) of women (P = .034).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no statistical difference in publications between men and women in this study. Women felt less supported when transitioning to a faculty role compared to men. Both men and women valued promotion equally, but men reported working towards that goal more intentionally. This study found few consistent differences in the attitudes and behaviors towards scholarship between men and women.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The majority of Physician assistant (PA) educators are women, yet men proportionately publish more and advance further in academic rank. This study examined if research interest, promotion goals, and perceptions of institutional support differed between PA educators with different gender identities.

Methods: This is a subset analysis of a previously published cross-sectional study. PA programs were stratified by region and Carnegie classification and were sampled by a stratified random sampling method. PA faculty from selected programs were invited to participate in an anonymous survey. Data were analyzed to account for the stratified sample design. Means and proportions with associated 95% confidence intervals are described.

Results: There was a 51% response rate (N = 110). Sixty-three percent of respondents identified as female and 36% as male. Men had a mean of 5.67 (0.17, 11.16) career research articles and women had 1.56 (0.68, 2.44) articles. Fifteen percent (3.7%, 26.3%) of men were full professor compared to 4.3% (0, 9.1%) of women. When transitioning to a faculty role, 72.5% (58.4%, 86.6%) of men and 52.9% (41%, 64.7%) of women felt supported by their institution. Both genders valued promotion, but 80% (67.6%, 92.4%) of men reported having clear 5-year goals compared to 58.8% (46.6%, 71%) of women (P = .034).

Conclusion: There was no statistical difference in publications between men and women in this study. Women felt less supported when transitioning to a faculty role compared to men. Both men and women valued promotion equally, but men reported working towards that goal more intentionally. This study found few consistent differences in the attitudes and behaviors towards scholarship between men and women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医师助理在研究、专业目标和支持观念方面的性别差异。
目的:大多数医师助理(PA)教育工作者是女性,但男性发表的论文更多,在学术排名上更进一步。本研究考察了不同性别身份的PA教育工作者的研究兴趣、晋升目标和对机构支持的看法是否存在差异。方法:这是对先前发表的横断面研究的子集分析。PA项目按地区和卡内基分类进行分层,并采用分层随机抽样方法进行抽样。来自选定项目的PA教员被邀请参加一项匿名调查。对数据进行分析,以说明分层样本设计。描述了具有相关95%置信区间的平均值和比例。结果:有效率为51%(N=110)。63%的受访者认为自己是女性,36%的受访者认为是男性。男性的职业研究文章平均数为5.67篇(0.1711.16),女性为1.56篇(0.68.244)。15%(3.7%,26.3%)的男性是正教授,而女性为4.3%(9.1%)。当过渡到教师角色时,72.5%(58.4%,86.6%)的男性和52.9%(41%,64.7%)的女性感到自己的机构支持他们。两性都重视晋升,但80%(67.6%,92.4%)的男性报告有明确的5年目标,而女性为58.8%(46.6%,71%)(P=0.034)。与男性相比,女性在过渡到教师岗位时感觉得到的支持更少。男性和女性都同等重视晋升,但男性报告称,他们更有意地为实现这一目标而努力。这项研究发现,男性和女性在对待学术的态度和行为上几乎没有一致的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
期刊最新文献
Using Four-Component Instructional Design to Create an Interactive Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum for Physician Associate Students. Strengthening the Multiple-Choice Assessment: Improving Item-Writing Skills of Physician Assistant Educators. Physician Assistant Training, Collaboration, and Practice Act Legislation: Perspectives From Practicing Physician Assistants. Compliance With Accreditation Standards on Diversity: Is Institutional Support the Missing Link? Viewing Medical Education Through the Lens of Second Language Acquisition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1