Latent Class Analysis with Measurement Invariance Testing: Simulation Study to Compare Overall Likelihood Ratio vs Residual Fit Statistics Based Model Selection

IF 2.5 2区 心理学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal Pub Date : 2023-08-22 DOI:10.1080/10705511.2023.2233115
Zsuzsa Bakk
{"title":"Latent Class Analysis with Measurement Invariance Testing: Simulation Study to Compare Overall Likelihood Ratio vs Residual Fit Statistics Based Model Selection","authors":"Zsuzsa Bakk","doi":"10.1080/10705511.2023.2233115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Abstract</b></p><p>A standard assumption of latent class (LC) analysis is conditional independence, that is the items of the LC are independent of the covariates given the LCs. Several approaches have been proposed for identifying violations of this assumption. The recently proposed likelihood ratio approach is compared to residual statistics (bivariate residuals [BVR] and expected parameter change [EPC] statistics) for identifying nonuniform direct effect of covariates on the items of the LC model. The simulation study results show that the likelihood ratio (LR) test correctly identifies direct effects more often than the BVR statistics, showing comparable results to the EPC statistic in many situations- this at the price of having also a higher false positive rate than BVR. A real data example illustrates the use of the three procedures. Overall the combined use of residual statistics and LR testing is recommended for applied research.</p>","PeriodicalId":21964,"journal":{"name":"Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2023.2233115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A standard assumption of latent class (LC) analysis is conditional independence, that is the items of the LC are independent of the covariates given the LCs. Several approaches have been proposed for identifying violations of this assumption. The recently proposed likelihood ratio approach is compared to residual statistics (bivariate residuals [BVR] and expected parameter change [EPC] statistics) for identifying nonuniform direct effect of covariates on the items of the LC model. The simulation study results show that the likelihood ratio (LR) test correctly identifies direct effects more often than the BVR statistics, showing comparable results to the EPC statistic in many situations- this at the price of having also a higher false positive rate than BVR. A real data example illustrates the use of the three procedures. Overall the combined use of residual statistics and LR testing is recommended for applied research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
潜在类分析与测量不变性检验:模拟研究比较整体似然比与残差拟合统计基于模型选择
摘要潜类分析的一个标准假设是条件独立的,即潜类的项与给定潜类的协变量无关。已经提出了几种方法来确定违反这一假设的情况。最近提出的似然比方法与残差统计(双变量残差[BVR]和期望参数变化[EPC]统计)进行了比较,用于识别协变量对LC模型项目的非均匀直接影响。模拟研究结果表明,似然比(LR)测试比BVR统计数据更能正确识别直接影响,在许多情况下显示出与EPC统计数据相当的结果-这是以比BVR更高的假阳性率为代价的。一个真实的数据示例说明了这三个过程的使用。总的来说,残差统计和LR检验的联合使用被推荐用于应用研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
11.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal publishes refereed scholarly work from all academic disciplines interested in structural equation modeling. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, psychology, medicine, sociology, education, political science, economics, management, and business/marketing. Theoretical articles address new developments; applied articles deal with innovative structural equation modeling applications; the Teacher’s Corner provides instructional modules on aspects of structural equation modeling; book and software reviews examine new modeling information and techniques; and advertising alerts readers to new products. Comments on technical or substantive issues addressed in articles or reviews published in the journal are encouraged; comments are reviewed, and authors of the original works are invited to respond.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Structural Equation Model Forests Performance to Identify Omitted Influential Covariates Evaluating Local Model Misspecification with Modification Indices in Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling Addressing Missing Data in Latent Class Analysis When Using a Three-Step Estimation Approach The Effect of Measurement Error on Hypothesis Testing in Small Sample Structural Equation Modeling: A Comparison of Various Estimation Approaches Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling with Cycles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1