The Robotic-Human Service Trilemma: the challenges for well-being within the human service triad

IF 7.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Service Management Pub Date : 2023-05-17 DOI:10.1108/josm-03-2022-0091
Chelsea Phillips, Rebekah Russell–Bennett, Gaby Odekerken-Schröder, Dominik Mahr, Kate Letheren
{"title":"The Robotic-Human Service Trilemma: the challenges for well-being within the human service triad","authors":"Chelsea Phillips, Rebekah Russell–Bennett, Gaby Odekerken-Schröder, Dominik Mahr, Kate Letheren","doi":"10.1108/josm-03-2022-0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The human service triad (i.e. the relationship between the customer, frontline employee (FLE) and managerial employee) experiences a range of well-being challenges when faced with the introduction of service robots. Despite growth in service robot scholarship, understanding of the well-being challenges affecting the human service triad remains fragmented. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to synthesise the literature and offer a research agenda aligned with the proposed Robotic-Human Service Trilemma. By taking a job performance approach (which considers the actions, behaviours and outcomes linked to organisational goals), the Robotic-Human Service Trilemma conceptualises three well-being challenges (intrusion, sideline and interchange). These challenges are realised via the realistic capabilities and constraints of service robot implementation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This research relies on a systematic review of all disciplines concerning service robots. In total, 82 articles were analysed using thematic coding and led to the development of the Robotic-Human Service Trilemma and research agenda.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The analyses reveal the Robotic-Human Service Trilemma consists of three challenges: intrusion, sideline and indifference. The findings demonstrate that FLEs are required to counterbalance the constraints of service robots, leading to an uneven well-being burden within the human service triad. This paper suggests a research agenda for investigation of the challenges that underpin the Robotic-Human Service Trilemma.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Through the conceptualisation of the Robotic-Human Service Trilemma, this study is the first to explore how states of well-being equilibrium exist within the human service triad and how these states are challenged by service robots. The authors present a balanced centricity perspective to well-being that contrasts previous trade-off approaches and that enhances the body of service robot literature with a well-being lens.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-03-2022-0091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose

The human service triad (i.e. the relationship between the customer, frontline employee (FLE) and managerial employee) experiences a range of well-being challenges when faced with the introduction of service robots. Despite growth in service robot scholarship, understanding of the well-being challenges affecting the human service triad remains fragmented. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to synthesise the literature and offer a research agenda aligned with the proposed Robotic-Human Service Trilemma. By taking a job performance approach (which considers the actions, behaviours and outcomes linked to organisational goals), the Robotic-Human Service Trilemma conceptualises three well-being challenges (intrusion, sideline and interchange). These challenges are realised via the realistic capabilities and constraints of service robot implementation.

Design/methodology/approach

This research relies on a systematic review of all disciplines concerning service robots. In total, 82 articles were analysed using thematic coding and led to the development of the Robotic-Human Service Trilemma and research agenda.

Findings

The analyses reveal the Robotic-Human Service Trilemma consists of three challenges: intrusion, sideline and indifference. The findings demonstrate that FLEs are required to counterbalance the constraints of service robots, leading to an uneven well-being burden within the human service triad. This paper suggests a research agenda for investigation of the challenges that underpin the Robotic-Human Service Trilemma.

Originality/value

Through the conceptualisation of the Robotic-Human Service Trilemma, this study is the first to explore how states of well-being equilibrium exist within the human service triad and how these states are challenged by service robots. The authors present a balanced centricity perspective to well-being that contrasts previous trade-off approaches and that enhances the body of service robot literature with a well-being lens.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人-人类服务三难困境:人类服务三难中的福祉挑战
当面对服务机器人的引入时,人类服务三元组(即客户,一线员工(FLE)和管理员工之间的关系)经历了一系列福祉挑战。尽管服务机器人的学术研究有所增长,但对影响人类服务三位一体的福祉挑战的理解仍然是零散的。因此,本文的目的是综合文献,并提供与提议的机器人-人类服务三难困境相一致的研究议程。通过采用工作绩效方法(考虑与组织目标相关的行动、行为和结果),机器人-人类服务三难困境将三种福祉挑战(入侵、副业和交流)概念化。这些挑战是通过服务机器人实现的现实能力和限制来实现的。设计/方法/方法本研究依赖于对服务机器人相关学科的系统回顾。总共有82篇文章使用主题编码进行了分析,并导致了机器人-人类服务三难困境和研究议程的发展。研究结果分析显示,机器人-人类服务三难困境包括三个挑战:入侵、边缘化和冷漠。研究结果表明,需要人工智能来抵消服务机器人的限制,从而导致人类服务三合一中的福祉负担不均衡。本文提出了一个研究议程,以调查支撑机器人-人类服务三难困境的挑战。独创性/价值通过机器人-人类服务三难困境的概念化,本研究首次探索了人类服务三难中福祉平衡状态的存在方式,以及这些状态如何受到服务机器人的挑战。作者提出了一个平衡的中心性视角的福祉,对比以前的权衡方法,并加强了服务机器人的身体与福祉的镜头。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Service Management (JOSM) centers its scope on research in service management. It disseminates papers showcasing distinctive and noteworthy contributions to service literature, serving as a communication platform for individuals in the service management field, transcending disciplines, functional areas, sectors, and nationalities. The journal publishes double-blind reviewed papers emphasizing service literature/theory and its practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Service virtuousness: implementing the very best of human qualities in service delivery Frontline employee work engagement and customer service evaluations: a conceptual replication Reuse of service concept elements for modular service design Organizational resiliency through practice innovation: forced brand evolution in a prolonged exogenous service ecosystem disruption Howdy, Robo-Partner: exploring artificial companionship and its stress-alleviating potential for service employees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1