Co-creation in healthcare: framing the outcomes and their determinants

IF 7.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Service Management Pub Date : 2023-01-23 DOI:10.1108/josm-06-2021-0212
Floriana Fusco, Marta Marsilio, Chiara Guglielmetti
{"title":"Co-creation in healthcare: framing the outcomes and their determinants","authors":"Floriana Fusco, Marta Marsilio, Chiara Guglielmetti","doi":"10.1108/josm-06-2021-0212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Understanding the outcomes of co-creation (CC) in healthcare is increasingly gaining multidisciplinary scientific interest. Although more and more service management scholars have pointed out the benefits of cross-fertilization between the various research fields, the literature on this topic is still scattered and poorly integrated. This study aims to summarize and integrate multiple strands of extant knowledge CC by identifying the outcomes of health CC and the determinants of these outcomes and their relationships.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A structured literature review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. A total of 4,189 records were retrieved from the six databases; 1,983 articles were screened, with 161 included in the qualitative thematic analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>This study advances a comprehensive framework for healthcare CC based on a thorough analysis of the outcomes and their determinants, that is, antecedents, management activities and institutional context. Extant research rarely evaluates outcomes from a multidimensional and systemic perspective. Less attention has been paid to the relationship among the CC process elements.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This study offers an agenda to guide future studies on healthcare CC. Highlighting some areas of integration among different disciplines further advances service literature.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The framework offers an operational guide to better shape managerial endeavors to facilitate CC, provide direction and assess multiple outcomes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This is the first extensive attempt to synthesize and integrate multidisciplinary knowledge on CC outcomes in healthcare settings by adopting a systematic perspective on the overall process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-06-2021-0212","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose

Understanding the outcomes of co-creation (CC) in healthcare is increasingly gaining multidisciplinary scientific interest. Although more and more service management scholars have pointed out the benefits of cross-fertilization between the various research fields, the literature on this topic is still scattered and poorly integrated. This study aims to summarize and integrate multiple strands of extant knowledge CC by identifying the outcomes of health CC and the determinants of these outcomes and their relationships.

Design/methodology/approach

A structured literature review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. A total of 4,189 records were retrieved from the six databases; 1,983 articles were screened, with 161 included in the qualitative thematic analysis.

Findings

This study advances a comprehensive framework for healthcare CC based on a thorough analysis of the outcomes and their determinants, that is, antecedents, management activities and institutional context. Extant research rarely evaluates outcomes from a multidimensional and systemic perspective. Less attention has been paid to the relationship among the CC process elements.

Research limitations/implications

This study offers an agenda to guide future studies on healthcare CC. Highlighting some areas of integration among different disciplines further advances service literature.

Practical implications

The framework offers an operational guide to better shape managerial endeavors to facilitate CC, provide direction and assess multiple outcomes.

Originality/value

This is the first extensive attempt to synthesize and integrate multidisciplinary knowledge on CC outcomes in healthcare settings by adopting a systematic perspective on the overall process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健领域的共同创造:构建结果及其决定因素
目的了解医疗保健中共同创造(CC)的结果正日益获得多学科的科学兴趣。尽管越来越多的服务管理学者指出了各个研究领域之间的交叉受精的好处,但关于这一主题的文献仍然是分散的,缺乏整合。本研究旨在通过确定健康CC的结果以及这些结果的决定因素及其关系,总结和整合现有CC知识的多个方面。设计/方法学/方法按照PRISMA指南进行结构化文献综述。从6个数据库共检索到4 189条记录;筛选了1 983篇文章,其中161篇纳入定性专题分析。本研究基于对结果及其决定因素(即前因、管理活动和制度背景)的全面分析,提出了医疗保健CC的综合框架。现有的研究很少从多维和系统的角度评估结果。对CC过程要素之间的关系关注较少。本研究为未来的医疗CC研究提供了一个指导议程,强调了不同学科之间整合的一些领域,进一步推动了服务文献的发展。该框架提供了一个操作指南,以更好地塑造管理努力,以促进CC,提供方向和评估多种结果。原创性/价值这是第一次广泛的尝试,通过对整个过程采用系统的观点,综合和整合医疗环境中CC结果的多学科知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Service Management (JOSM) centers its scope on research in service management. It disseminates papers showcasing distinctive and noteworthy contributions to service literature, serving as a communication platform for individuals in the service management field, transcending disciplines, functional areas, sectors, and nationalities. The journal publishes double-blind reviewed papers emphasizing service literature/theory and its practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Service virtuousness: implementing the very best of human qualities in service delivery Frontline employee work engagement and customer service evaluations: a conceptual replication Reuse of service concept elements for modular service design Organizational resiliency through practice innovation: forced brand evolution in a prolonged exogenous service ecosystem disruption Howdy, Robo-Partner: exploring artificial companionship and its stress-alleviating potential for service employees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1