Realizing the economic and circular potential of sharing business models by engaging consumers

IF 7.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Service Management Pub Date : 2022-06-06 DOI:10.1108/josm-08-2021-0318
Marie-Julie De Bruyne, Katrien Verleye
{"title":"Realizing the economic and circular potential of sharing business models by engaging consumers","authors":"Marie-Julie De Bruyne, Katrien Verleye","doi":"10.1108/josm-08-2021-0318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Today's sharing economy covers a variety of business models. This research aims to (1) identify dimensions along which sharing businesses may vary and (2) investigate how these dimensions influence consumer engagement while considering consumers' sustainability orientation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This research relies upon a systematic literature review (<em>n</em> = 67 articles) to identify five sharing business dimensions: (1) ownership transfer, (2) professional involvement, (3) compensation, (4) digitalization and (5) community scope. A discrete choice conjoint experiment in the fashion industry is employed to investigate how these dimensions affect consumer engagement with sharing businesses (<em>n</em> = 383 participants).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results suggest that ownership of tangible resources elicits more engagement than access to tangible resources for both consumers with a low sustainability orientation and consumers with a high sustainability orientation. Community scope also affects consumer engagement as reflected in more engagement towards sharing businesses with a local rather than a global scope. The presence of professional service providers, monetary compensation and a digital platform only induces engagement among consumers with a low sustainability orientation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research generates a better understanding of how sharing businesses can draw on business dimensions to engage consumers with different levels of sustainability orientation and, in turn, how sharing businesses can realize their economic and/or circular potential.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-08-2021-0318","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose

Today's sharing economy covers a variety of business models. This research aims to (1) identify dimensions along which sharing businesses may vary and (2) investigate how these dimensions influence consumer engagement while considering consumers' sustainability orientation.

Design/methodology/approach

This research relies upon a systematic literature review (n = 67 articles) to identify five sharing business dimensions: (1) ownership transfer, (2) professional involvement, (3) compensation, (4) digitalization and (5) community scope. A discrete choice conjoint experiment in the fashion industry is employed to investigate how these dimensions affect consumer engagement with sharing businesses (n = 383 participants).

Findings

The results suggest that ownership of tangible resources elicits more engagement than access to tangible resources for both consumers with a low sustainability orientation and consumers with a high sustainability orientation. Community scope also affects consumer engagement as reflected in more engagement towards sharing businesses with a local rather than a global scope. The presence of professional service providers, monetary compensation and a digital platform only induces engagement among consumers with a low sustainability orientation.

Originality/value

This research generates a better understanding of how sharing businesses can draw on business dimensions to engage consumers with different levels of sustainability orientation and, in turn, how sharing businesses can realize their economic and/or circular potential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过吸引消费者,实现共享商业模式的经济和循环潜力
如今的共享经济涵盖了多种商业模式。本研究旨在(1)确定共享业务可能变化的维度,(2)在考虑消费者可持续性取向的情况下,调查这些维度如何影响消费者参与。设计/方法/方法本研究通过系统的文献综述(n = 67篇文章)来确定五个共享业务维度:(1)所有权转移,(2)专业参与,(3)薪酬,(4)数字化和(5)社区范围。采用时尚行业的离散选择联合实验来研究这些维度如何影响消费者对共享企业的参与(n = 383名参与者)。研究结果表明,对于低可持续取向和高可持续取向的消费者来说,拥有有形资源比获得有形资源更能吸引消费者的参与。社区范围也会影响消费者的参与,这反映在更多的参与与本地而不是全球范围共享业务。专业服务提供商、货币补偿和数字平台的存在只会吸引具有低可持续性取向的消费者参与。原创性/价值本研究有助于更好地理解共享企业如何利用商业维度吸引具有不同可持续性取向水平的消费者,进而了解共享企业如何实现其经济和/或循环潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Service Management (JOSM) centers its scope on research in service management. It disseminates papers showcasing distinctive and noteworthy contributions to service literature, serving as a communication platform for individuals in the service management field, transcending disciplines, functional areas, sectors, and nationalities. The journal publishes double-blind reviewed papers emphasizing service literature/theory and its practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Service virtuousness: implementing the very best of human qualities in service delivery Frontline employee work engagement and customer service evaluations: a conceptual replication Reuse of service concept elements for modular service design Organizational resiliency through practice innovation: forced brand evolution in a prolonged exogenous service ecosystem disruption Howdy, Robo-Partner: exploring artificial companionship and its stress-alleviating potential for service employees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1