Crisis communication in service ecosystems: perspectives and future challenges

IF 7.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Service Management Pub Date : 2022-04-25 DOI:10.1108/josm-11-2021-0436
Lorena Blasco-Arcas, Jesper Falkheimer, Mats Heide
{"title":"Crisis communication in service ecosystems: perspectives and future challenges","authors":"Lorena Blasco-Arcas, Jesper Falkheimer, Mats Heide","doi":"10.1108/josm-11-2021-0436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this article is to offer new insights into crisis communication in service ecosystems. The authors present a framework to conceptually categorize service crises and then analyze key aspects of crisis communication among different stakeholders in a service ecosystem.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Building on crisis communication and service ecosystems research, we propose a framework to better understand crisis communication during service crises in service ecosystems. In doing so, we propose a typology of service crisis in service ecosystems and identify the main factors of crisis communication under the lens of the Rhetorical Arena Theory (RAT).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>This article integrates communication theory and service research in the area and identifies different key dimensions to gain a deeper understanding of crisis communication in service ecosystems. Moreover, and building on RAT, several research lines are recommended in order to explore further macro (i.e. the role and interactions between different stakeholders in the event of a crisis) and micro (i.e. individual aspects related to the context, media, genre and text) dimensions, and their importance during the communication process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Our framework offers a typology of service crises and suggests the importance of considering a multi-actor, multi-channel perspective in communication when a crisis occurs in order to monitor and avoid the potential negative impact for both the organization's recovery and the service ecosystem evolution afterward.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Management","volume":"42 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-11-2021-0436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to offer new insights into crisis communication in service ecosystems. The authors present a framework to conceptually categorize service crises and then analyze key aspects of crisis communication among different stakeholders in a service ecosystem.

Design/methodology/approach

Building on crisis communication and service ecosystems research, we propose a framework to better understand crisis communication during service crises in service ecosystems. In doing so, we propose a typology of service crisis in service ecosystems and identify the main factors of crisis communication under the lens of the Rhetorical Arena Theory (RAT).

Findings

This article integrates communication theory and service research in the area and identifies different key dimensions to gain a deeper understanding of crisis communication in service ecosystems. Moreover, and building on RAT, several research lines are recommended in order to explore further macro (i.e. the role and interactions between different stakeholders in the event of a crisis) and micro (i.e. individual aspects related to the context, media, genre and text) dimensions, and their importance during the communication process.

Originality/value

Our framework offers a typology of service crises and suggests the importance of considering a multi-actor, multi-channel perspective in communication when a crisis occurs in order to monitor and avoid the potential negative impact for both the organization's recovery and the service ecosystem evolution afterward.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
服务生态系统中的危机沟通:观点和未来挑战
本文的目的是为服务生态系统中的危机传播提供新的见解。作者提出了一个框架,从概念上对服务危机进行分类,然后分析了服务生态系统中不同利益相关者之间危机沟通的关键方面。在危机沟通和服务生态系统研究的基础上,我们提出了一个框架,以更好地理解服务生态系统中服务危机期间的危机沟通。为此,我们提出了服务生态系统中服务危机的类型,并在修辞竞技场理论(RAT)的视角下确定了危机传播的主要因素。本文将传播理论与该领域的服务研究相结合,确定了不同的关键维度,以更深入地了解服务生态系统中的危机传播。此外,在RAT的基础上,建议进行一些研究,以进一步探索宏观(即危机事件中不同利益相关者之间的角色和相互作用)和微观(即与上下文,媒体,类型和文本相关的个人方面)维度及其在传播过程中的重要性。原创性/价值我们的框架提供了服务危机的类型,并建议在危机发生时考虑多参与者、多渠道的沟通视角的重要性,以便监测和避免对组织的恢复和随后的服务生态系统演变的潜在负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Service Management (JOSM) centers its scope on research in service management. It disseminates papers showcasing distinctive and noteworthy contributions to service literature, serving as a communication platform for individuals in the service management field, transcending disciplines, functional areas, sectors, and nationalities. The journal publishes double-blind reviewed papers emphasizing service literature/theory and its practical applications.
期刊最新文献
A new competitive edge: crafting a service climate that facilitates optimal human–AI collaboration Elevating the human experience through service standards: insights from the global refugee crisis Service virtuousness: implementing the very best of human qualities in service delivery Frontline employee work engagement and customer service evaluations: a conceptual replication Reuse of service concept elements for modular service design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1