The material effects of Whiteness: Institutional racism in the German welfare state

IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Review Pub Date : 2022-07-10 DOI:10.1177/00380261221108596
Aleksandra Lewicki
{"title":"The material effects of Whiteness: Institutional racism in the German welfare state","authors":"Aleksandra Lewicki","doi":"10.1177/00380261221108596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The scholarship on institutional racism has emerged from contexts such as Australia, the UK or the US. Less is known about how racism operates within institutional settings elsewhere. What is more, our understanding of Whiteness is shaped by this Anglocentric literature. In this article, I explore the contextual features of Whiteness in residential care in Germany. More specifically, I trace how institutional routines shape affective subjectivities and thereby develop material effects. The study draws on 17 expert interviews and 20 interviews with managers of care homes run by the two largest providers, the Christian welfare associations Caritas and Diakonie. Respondents frequently highlighted their organisation’s commitment to equality, which they saw grounded in its Christian ethos, their professional self-understanding as carers, or Germany’s post-racial nationhood. Paradoxically, however, my analysis shows that respondents also deployed these ‘representations of self’ to justify access and service quality differentials. On this basis, I argue that Whiteness materialises via self-ascribed civility, ‘goodness’ and egalitarianism in the German welfare state. Signified by visual markers, Whiteness emerges from projections of purity, innocence and good intentions. In varying ways, groups distinctively racialised as ‘Other’, notably as ‘Black’, ‘Muslim’ or ‘Eastern European’, are placed outside this notion of Whiteness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48250,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Review","volume":"78 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221108596","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scholarship on institutional racism has emerged from contexts such as Australia, the UK or the US. Less is known about how racism operates within institutional settings elsewhere. What is more, our understanding of Whiteness is shaped by this Anglocentric literature. In this article, I explore the contextual features of Whiteness in residential care in Germany. More specifically, I trace how institutional routines shape affective subjectivities and thereby develop material effects. The study draws on 17 expert interviews and 20 interviews with managers of care homes run by the two largest providers, the Christian welfare associations Caritas and Diakonie. Respondents frequently highlighted their organisation’s commitment to equality, which they saw grounded in its Christian ethos, their professional self-understanding as carers, or Germany’s post-racial nationhood. Paradoxically, however, my analysis shows that respondents also deployed these ‘representations of self’ to justify access and service quality differentials. On this basis, I argue that Whiteness materialises via self-ascribed civility, ‘goodness’ and egalitarianism in the German welfare state. Signified by visual markers, Whiteness emerges from projections of purity, innocence and good intentions. In varying ways, groups distinctively racialised as ‘Other’, notably as ‘Black’, ‘Muslim’ or ‘Eastern European’, are placed outside this notion of Whiteness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白人的物质效应:德国福利国家的制度性种族主义
关于制度性种族主义的学术研究出现在澳大利亚、英国或美国等国家。关于种族主义如何在其他地方的机构环境中运作,人们知之甚少。更重要的是,我们对白人的理解是由这种以英国为中心的文学塑造的。在这篇文章中,我探讨了在德国的住宅护理白的语境特征。更具体地说,我追踪制度惯例如何塑造情感主体性,从而发展物质效应。这项研究对17位专家进行了采访,并对两家最大的养老院的管理者进行了20次采访,这两家养老院是由基督教福利协会Caritas和Diakonie经营的。受访者经常强调他们的组织对平等的承诺,他们认为这是基于基督教精神,他们作为照顾者的职业自我理解,或者德国的后种族国家。然而,矛盾的是,我的分析表明,受访者也使用这些“自我表征”来证明访问和服务质量差异的合理性。在此基础上,我认为,在德国福利国家中,白人通过自我认定的文明、“善良”和平等主义实现了物质化。通过视觉标记,白色从纯粹、天真和善意的投射中浮现出来。以不同的方式,明显被种族化为“他者”的群体,特别是“黑人”、“穆斯林”或“东欧人”,被置于白人的概念之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Review
Sociological Review SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The Sociological Review has been publishing high quality and innovative articles for over 100 years. During this time we have steadfastly remained a general sociological journal, selecting papers of immediate and lasting significance. Covering all branches of the discipline, including criminology, education, gender, medicine, and organization, our tradition extends to research that is anthropological or philosophical in orientation and analytical or ethnographic in approach. We focus on questions that shape the nature and scope of sociology as well as those that address the changing forms and impact of social relations. In saying this we are not soliciting papers that seek to prescribe methods or dictate perspectives for the discipline. In opening up frontiers and publishing leading-edge research, we see these heterodox issues being settled and unsettled over time by virtue of contributors keeping the debates that occupy sociologists vital and relevant.
期刊最新文献
Suicide as slow death: towards a haunted sociology of suicide. Who counts in poverty research? Varieties of alternativeness: Relational practices in collaborative housing in Vienna Grieving academic grant rejections: Examining funding failure and experiences of loss Movement meaning of money: Monetary mobilization in Hong Kong’s prodemocracy movement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1