The effectiveness of the FRIENDS programs for children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review

Brian Fisak , Kelly Griffin , Christopher Nelson , Julia Gallegos-Guajardo , Sara Davila
{"title":"The effectiveness of the FRIENDS programs for children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review","authors":"Brian Fisak ,&nbsp;Kelly Griffin ,&nbsp;Christopher Nelson ,&nbsp;Julia Gallegos-Guajardo ,&nbsp;Sara Davila","doi":"10.1016/j.mhp.2023.200271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>FRIENDS is an internationally recognized program designed to prevent anxiety and improve resilience skills. More specifically, the program is grounded in cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and is activity/play based, and variations of the program have been adapted for all age groups (i.e., preschool through adulthood). Numerous clinical trials have been conducted to examine the efficacy of these programs. The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analytic review of the FRIENDS program for children and adolescents. A total of 41 controlled trials met inclusion criteria, and findings indicated that, relative to comparison groups, those who took part in FRIENDS exhibited lower scores on measures of anxiety (</span><em>d</em>= -0.20) and measures of depression (<em>d</em><span>= -0.24) at post-intervention. In addition, the effect sizes were maintained at 6- to 12-month follow-up. Based on moderator analyses, larger effect sizes were found for trials conducted by mental health clinicians relative to other professionals. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend towards larger effect sizes for targeted programs (</span><em>d</em>= -0.41) relative to universal programs (<em>d</em>= -0.14). Results of other moderator analyses, results of uncontrolled trials, and directions for future research are also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55864,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health and Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212657023000132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

FRIENDS is an internationally recognized program designed to prevent anxiety and improve resilience skills. More specifically, the program is grounded in cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and is activity/play based, and variations of the program have been adapted for all age groups (i.e., preschool through adulthood). Numerous clinical trials have been conducted to examine the efficacy of these programs. The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analytic review of the FRIENDS program for children and adolescents. A total of 41 controlled trials met inclusion criteria, and findings indicated that, relative to comparison groups, those who took part in FRIENDS exhibited lower scores on measures of anxiety (d= -0.20) and measures of depression (d= -0.24) at post-intervention. In addition, the effect sizes were maintained at 6- to 12-month follow-up. Based on moderator analyses, larger effect sizes were found for trials conducted by mental health clinicians relative to other professionals. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend towards larger effect sizes for targeted programs (d= -0.41) relative to universal programs (d= -0.14). Results of other moderator analyses, results of uncontrolled trials, and directions for future research are also discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童和青少年朋友计划的有效性:元分析综述
FRIENDS是一个国际公认的项目,旨在预防焦虑和提高应变能力。更具体地说,该计划以认知行为疗法(CBT)为基础,以活动/游戏为基础,该计划的变体已适用于所有年龄组(即学前至成年)。已经进行了大量的临床试验来检验这些方案的疗效。本研究的目的是对儿童和青少年的FRIENDS计划进行元分析审查。共有41项对照试验符合纳入标准,研究结果表明,与对照组相比,那些参加FRIENDS的人在干预后的焦虑(d=-0.20)和抑郁(d=-0.24)指标上得分较低。此外,效果大小维持在6至12个月的随访。基于调节因子分析,心理健康临床医生进行的试验发现,与其他专业人员相比,效果更大。尽管没有统计学意义,但与通用程序(d=-0.14)相比,有针对性程序(d=-0.41)的效果大小更大的趋势。还讨论了其他调节因子分析的结果、非对照试验的结果以及未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mental Health and Prevention
Mental Health and Prevention Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 days
期刊最新文献
Improving resilience and mental well-being among refugees residing at asylum centers in the Netherlands: A pre-post feasibility study “It's the people that make the difference”: Understanding the significance of psychosocial support for professional athletes Parenting strategies to support adolescent mental health during a pandemic: A Delphi consensus study Whāia te iti kahurangi: Seeking perinatal mental health equity. Māori offer solutions for the health system Are younger people more accurate at identifying mental health disorders, recommending help appropriately, and do they show lower mental health stigma than older people?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1