Characteristics of ocean mesoscale eddies in the Agulhas and Tasman Leakage regions from two eddy datasets

IF 2.3 3区 地球科学 Q2 OCEANOGRAPHY Deep-sea Research Part Ii-topical Studies in Oceanography Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.dsr2.2023.105264
Lansu Wei , Chunzai Wang
{"title":"Characteristics of ocean mesoscale eddies in the Agulhas and Tasman Leakage regions from two eddy datasets","authors":"Lansu Wei ,&nbsp;Chunzai Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.dsr2.2023.105264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mesoscale eddies<span> play an essential role in the freshwater transport, ocean circulation and climate. Although there is no completely objective eddy dataset, observations can better reproduce the eddies in the ocean as data resolution is improved and eddy detection methods are developed to some extent. This study uses satellite altimeter data and compares the Mesoscale Eddy Trajectory Atlas Product (META) with the Global Ocean Mesoscale Eddy Atmospheric-Oceanic-Biological Interaction Observational Dataset (GOMEAD) to analyze the mesoscale eddy characteristics in the oceanic pathways in the Agulhas Leakage (AL) region at the intersection of the Indian and Atlantic Oceans, and the Tasman Leakage (TL) region between the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Here we show that, the META dataset is more applicable for the detection of small-radius eddies, but this product increases the risk of over-detection. The GOMEAD dataset offers precise eddy boundaries and is useful for identifying large diameter eddies. The characteristics of eddies in the AL and TL regions are analyzed, and the results indicate that GOMEAD is more suited for eddy detection and analysis in the AL, while the META dataset is better suited for studies of mesoscale eddies of the TL region. Choosing the appropriate dataset is important for understanding the role of mesoscale eddies of different areas in a changing climate.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":11120,"journal":{"name":"Deep-sea Research Part Ii-topical Studies in Oceanography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deep-sea Research Part Ii-topical Studies in Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967064523000140","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mesoscale eddies play an essential role in the freshwater transport, ocean circulation and climate. Although there is no completely objective eddy dataset, observations can better reproduce the eddies in the ocean as data resolution is improved and eddy detection methods are developed to some extent. This study uses satellite altimeter data and compares the Mesoscale Eddy Trajectory Atlas Product (META) with the Global Ocean Mesoscale Eddy Atmospheric-Oceanic-Biological Interaction Observational Dataset (GOMEAD) to analyze the mesoscale eddy characteristics in the oceanic pathways in the Agulhas Leakage (AL) region at the intersection of the Indian and Atlantic Oceans, and the Tasman Leakage (TL) region between the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Here we show that, the META dataset is more applicable for the detection of small-radius eddies, but this product increases the risk of over-detection. The GOMEAD dataset offers precise eddy boundaries and is useful for identifying large diameter eddies. The characteristics of eddies in the AL and TL regions are analyzed, and the results indicate that GOMEAD is more suited for eddy detection and analysis in the AL, while the META dataset is better suited for studies of mesoscale eddies of the TL region. Choosing the appropriate dataset is important for understanding the role of mesoscale eddies of different areas in a changing climate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自两个涡数据集的Agulhas和Tasman泄漏区海洋中尺度涡特征
中尺度涡旋在淡水输送、海洋环流和气候方面发挥着重要作用。尽管没有完全客观的涡流数据集,但随着数据分辨率的提高和涡流检测方法的发展,观测可以更好地再现海洋中的涡流。本研究利用卫星高度计数据,将中尺度涡旋轨迹图谱产品(META)与全球海洋-中尺度涡旋-大气-海洋生物相互作用观测数据集(GOMEAD)进行比较,分析了印度洋和大西洋交汇处Agulhas Leakage(AL)区域海洋路径中的中尺度涡旋特征,以及印度洋和太平洋之间的塔斯曼泄漏区。在这里,我们表明,META数据集更适用于小半径涡流的检测,但该产品增加了过度检测的风险。GOMEAD数据集提供了精确的涡流边界,可用于识别大直径涡流。分析了AL和TL区域的涡流特征,结果表明,GOMEAD更适合AL区域的涡流检测和分析,而META数据集更适合TL区域的中尺度涡流研究。选择合适的数据集对于理解不同地区的中尺度涡旋在气候变化中的作用很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
115
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography publishes topical issues from the many international and interdisciplinary projects which are undertaken in oceanography. Besides these special issues from projects, the journal publishes collections of papers presented at conferences. The special issues regularly have electronic annexes of non-text material (numerical data, images, images, video, etc.) which are published with the special issues in ScienceDirect. Deep-Sea Research Part II was split off as a separate journal devoted to topical issues in 1993. Its companion journal Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, publishes the regular research papers in this area.
期刊最新文献
Geomorphology and oceanography of central-eastern Indian Ocean seamounts Distribution characteristics of microplastics in the surface mixed layer of the western Indian Ocean Editorial Board Local size structure and distribution of demersal fish in relation to sea pens and other benthic habitats in a deep-sea soft-bottom environment A decrease in pH, increase in temperature, and pollution exposure elicit distinct stress responses in a scleractinian coral (Desmophyllum pertusum)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1