Enhancing language-responsive meaning-making processes as an epistemic catalyst for developing multiplicative reasoning in young children

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Mathematical Behavior Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101034
Daniela Götze , Annica Baiker
{"title":"Enhancing language-responsive meaning-making processes as an epistemic catalyst for developing multiplicative reasoning in young children","authors":"Daniela Götze ,&nbsp;Annica Baiker","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Multiplicative reasoning involves the ability to coordinate bundled units on a more abstract level (“unitizing”; Lamon, 1994). As it is considered a “cutoff point” for students’ future mathematical learning, teachers must provide equitable access to mathematical conceptual understanding for all students on all mathematical achievement levels. The study presented in this paper investigates to what extent a preventive and a language-responsive instructional approach can have an effect on the outcome of students on different mathematical achievement levels. Three German second grade teachers introduced multiplication to students (<em>n</em> = 66, aged 7–8 years) in their classes using meaning-related phrases (e.g., “6 times 4 means 6 fours”), while teachers in the control group (<em>n</em> = 58) did not focus on using these phrases. Analyses of both a multiplication posttest and a follow-up test showed significant differences between the intervention and control groups on all achievement levels for both conceptual and procedural items.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732312323000044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiplicative reasoning involves the ability to coordinate bundled units on a more abstract level (“unitizing”; Lamon, 1994). As it is considered a “cutoff point” for students’ future mathematical learning, teachers must provide equitable access to mathematical conceptual understanding for all students on all mathematical achievement levels. The study presented in this paper investigates to what extent a preventive and a language-responsive instructional approach can have an effect on the outcome of students on different mathematical achievement levels. Three German second grade teachers introduced multiplication to students (n = 66, aged 7–8 years) in their classes using meaning-related phrases (e.g., “6 times 4 means 6 fours”), while teachers in the control group (n = 58) did not focus on using these phrases. Analyses of both a multiplication posttest and a follow-up test showed significant differences between the intervention and control groups on all achievement levels for both conceptual and procedural items.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强语言反应意义生成过程作为幼儿发展乘法推理的认知催化剂
乘法推理涉及在更抽象的层面上协调捆绑单元的能力(“单元化”;Lamon,1994)。由于它被认为是学生未来数学学习的“临界点”,教师必须为所有数学成绩水平的学生提供公平的数学概念理解机会。本文提出的研究调查了预防性和语言反应性的教学方法在多大程度上会对不同数学成绩水平的学生的成绩产生影响。三名德国二年级教师在课堂上使用与意义相关的短语(例如,“6乘4意味着6乘4”)向学生(n=66,年龄7-8岁)介绍乘法,而对照组的教师(n=58)则没有重点使用这些短语。对乘法后测和后续测试的分析显示,干预组和对照组在概念和程序项目的所有成就水平上都存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Behavior
Journal of Mathematical Behavior EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
17.60%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mathematical Behavior solicits original research on the learning and teaching of mathematics. We are interested especially in basic research, research that aims to clarify, in detail and depth, how mathematical ideas develop in learners. Over three decades, our experience confirms a founding premise of this journal: that mathematical thinking, hence mathematics learning as a social enterprise, is special. It is special because mathematics is special, both logically and psychologically. Logically, through the way that mathematical ideas and methods have been built, refined and organized for centuries across a range of cultures; and psychologically, through the variety of ways people today, in many walks of life, make sense of mathematics, develop it, make it their own.
期刊最新文献
Encouraging students to explain their ideas when learning mathematics: A psychological perspective Lecturers' use of questions in undergraduate mathematics lectures Secondary teachers’ guided reinvention of the definitions of reducible and irreducible elements Creating and sharing linear algebra metaphors as an assessment for engaging students beyond the cognitive domain Engagement with student written work as an instantiation of and proxy for how college calculus instructors engage with student thinking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1