Written corrective feedback in an online community: A typology of English language learners’ requests and interlocutors’ responses

Q1 Arts and Humanities Computers and Composition Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102752
Matt Kessler
{"title":"Written corrective feedback in an online community: A typology of English language learners’ requests and interlocutors’ responses","authors":"Matt Kessler","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Studies involving written corrective feedback (WCF) have been integral to first and second language (L1/L2) research for multiple decades. However, scholars have noted that most studies have tended to be researcher-led interventions that occur in a classroom setting. Crucially, little is known about WCF beyond the classroom, especially in nonacademic online environments. The current study investigates this issue by exploring the nature of WCF in an asynchronous online community known as the WordReference language forums. Using a combination of netnography and quantitative methods, over a four-month span, the author investigated: (1) the feedback-seeking behaviors of L2 English learners in an online forum; (2) the extent to which individual learners differed in their feedback-seeking behaviors; and (3) the nature of the WCF given to learners by L1 English-speaking interlocutors. The findings show that learners frequently engaged in a number of feedback-seeking behaviors identified in previous scholarship (e.g., clarification and confirmation requests); however, some learners differed in the types of feedback they sought online. Additionally, the L1 English-speaking interlocutors responded to these requests using WCF types that have not been reported in existing literature. Thus, this study proposes a new typology/classification system for understanding the nature of online feedback.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Composition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461523000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Studies involving written corrective feedback (WCF) have been integral to first and second language (L1/L2) research for multiple decades. However, scholars have noted that most studies have tended to be researcher-led interventions that occur in a classroom setting. Crucially, little is known about WCF beyond the classroom, especially in nonacademic online environments. The current study investigates this issue by exploring the nature of WCF in an asynchronous online community known as the WordReference language forums. Using a combination of netnography and quantitative methods, over a four-month span, the author investigated: (1) the feedback-seeking behaviors of L2 English learners in an online forum; (2) the extent to which individual learners differed in their feedback-seeking behaviors; and (3) the nature of the WCF given to learners by L1 English-speaking interlocutors. The findings show that learners frequently engaged in a number of feedback-seeking behaviors identified in previous scholarship (e.g., clarification and confirmation requests); however, some learners differed in the types of feedback they sought online. Additionally, the L1 English-speaking interlocutors responded to these requests using WCF types that have not been reported in existing literature. Thus, this study proposes a new typology/classification system for understanding the nature of online feedback.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线社区中的书面纠正反馈:英语学习者的请求和对话者的回应类型
几十年来,涉及书面纠正反馈(WCF)的研究一直是第一语言和第二语言(L1/L2)研究的组成部分。然而,学者们注意到,大多数研究往往是在课堂环境中由研究人员主导的干预措施。至关重要的是,在课堂之外,人们对WCF知之甚少,尤其是在非学术在线环境中。目前的研究通过在一个名为WordReference语言论坛的异步在线社区中探索WCF的性质来调查这个问题。采用网络图和定量相结合的方法,在四个多月的时间里,作者调查了:(1)二语英语学习者在网络论坛中的反馈寻求行为;(2) 个体学习者在寻求反馈行为方面的差异程度;以及(3)母语为英语的对话者给予学习者的WCF的性质。研究结果表明,学习者经常参与以前的学术研究中发现的一些寻求反馈的行为(例如,澄清和确认请求);然而,一些学习者在网上寻求反馈的类型不同。此外,母语为英语的对话者使用现有文献中未报道的WCF类型来回应这些请求。因此,本研究提出了一种新的类型学/分类系统来理解在线反馈的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Composition
Computers and Composition Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Composition: An International Journal is devoted to exploring the use of computers in writing classes, writing programs, and writing research. It provides a forum for discussing issues connected with writing and computer use. It also offers information about integrating computers into writing programs on the basis of sound theoretical and pedagogical decisions, and empirical evidence. It welcomes articles, reviews, and letters to the Editors that may be of interest to readers, including descriptions of computer-aided writing and/or reading instruction, discussions of topics related to computer use of software development; explorations of controversial ethical, legal, or social issues related to the use of computers in writing programs.
期刊最新文献
“Wayfinding” through the AI wilderness: Mapping rhetorics of ChatGPT prompt writing on X (formerly Twitter) to promote critical AI literacies Exploring the interaction among writing fluency, writing processes, and external resource access in second language writing assessment Ecologies, bodies, and OWI teacher preparation: reflecting on a practicum for graduate instructors teaching writing online When generative artificial intelligence meets multimodal composition: Rethinking the composition process through an AI-assisted design project Multilingual English second language students’ voice in digital storytelling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1