Till the cloud do us part: Technological disruption and brand retention in the enterprise software industry

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Research in Marketing Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.11.001
Barış Kocaman , Sarah Gelper , Fred Langerak
{"title":"Till the cloud do us part: Technological disruption and brand retention in the enterprise software industry","authors":"Barış Kocaman ,&nbsp;Sarah Gelper ,&nbsp;Fred Langerak","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As customers in technologically disrupted markets migrate from the old to the new technology, they concurrently decide whether to retain their brand or churn. Yet little is known about brand retention at the time of technology migration, which is the topic of this study. Focusing on cloud disruption in the enterprise software industry, we examine the brand retention of software customers migrating from the old on-premise to the new cloud technology. We combine a large panel of 4,659 customers across 30 brands and five horizontal markets (CRM, BI, HR, ERP, Finance) with brand classification data from industry experts. Our findings reveal that brand retention is the lowest at the time of technology migration (compared to before or after migration), yet some brands are significantly more vulnerable to churn of migrating customers than others. Brand retention at the time of migration is lower for brands that face the same rivals across multiple horizontal markets (i.e., high multimarket contact) than for brands that do not, and the retention disadvantage of such high multimarket contact brands even aggravates as the cloud technology diffuses. Furthermore, top-tier brands are less vulnerable than bottom-tier brands, but their advantage levels out as the cloud technology diffuses. Our findings help brands evaluate their vulnerability to churn of migrating customers and hence are highly relevant for B2B brands in technologically disrupted markets. To facilitate such evaluation, we present a simple assessment tool and provide guidance on mitigating vulnerability to churn.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 316-341"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811622000738","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As customers in technologically disrupted markets migrate from the old to the new technology, they concurrently decide whether to retain their brand or churn. Yet little is known about brand retention at the time of technology migration, which is the topic of this study. Focusing on cloud disruption in the enterprise software industry, we examine the brand retention of software customers migrating from the old on-premise to the new cloud technology. We combine a large panel of 4,659 customers across 30 brands and five horizontal markets (CRM, BI, HR, ERP, Finance) with brand classification data from industry experts. Our findings reveal that brand retention is the lowest at the time of technology migration (compared to before or after migration), yet some brands are significantly more vulnerable to churn of migrating customers than others. Brand retention at the time of migration is lower for brands that face the same rivals across multiple horizontal markets (i.e., high multimarket contact) than for brands that do not, and the retention disadvantage of such high multimarket contact brands even aggravates as the cloud technology diffuses. Furthermore, top-tier brands are less vulnerable than bottom-tier brands, but their advantage levels out as the cloud technology diffuses. Our findings help brands evaluate their vulnerability to churn of migrating customers and hence are highly relevant for B2B brands in technologically disrupted markets. To facilitate such evaluation, we present a simple assessment tool and provide guidance on mitigating vulnerability to churn.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直到云把我们分开:企业软件行业的技术颠覆和品牌保留
随着技术混乱的市场中的客户从旧技术转移到新技术,他们同时决定是保留自己的品牌还是流失。然而,人们对技术迁移时的品牌保留知之甚少,这正是本研究的主题。围绕企业软件行业的云颠覆,我们研究了软件客户从旧的内部部署迁移到新的云技术的品牌保留率。我们将30个品牌和五个横向市场(CRM、BI、HR、ERP、Finance)的4659名客户与行业专家的品牌分类数据相结合。我们的研究结果表明,在技术迁移时(与迁移前或迁移后相比),品牌留存率最低,但一些品牌比其他品牌更容易受到迁移客户流失的影响。在迁移时,在多个横向市场上面对相同竞争对手的品牌(即,高多市场接触度)的品牌留存率低于不面对相同对手的品牌,而且随着云技术的普及,这种高多市场联系度品牌的留存劣势甚至加剧。此外,顶级品牌比底层品牌更不容易受到攻击,但随着云技术的普及,它们的优势逐渐显现。我们的研究结果有助于品牌评估其对迁移客户流失的脆弱性,因此与技术混乱市场中的B2B品牌高度相关。为了便于进行此类评估,我们提供了一个简单的评估工具,并就减少流失的脆弱性提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Research in Marketing is an international, double-blind peer-reviewed journal for marketing academics and practitioners. Building on a great tradition of global marketing scholarship, IJRM aims to contribute substantially to the field of marketing research by providing a high-quality medium for the dissemination of new marketing knowledge and methods. Among IJRM targeted audience are marketing scholars, practitioners (e.g., marketing research and consulting professionals) and other interested groups and individuals.
期刊最新文献
Gender and racial price disparities in the NFT marketplace Online reviews: A literature review and roadmap for future research A method for measuring consumer confusion due to lookalike labels Editorial Board Strange Case of Dr. Bidder and Mr. Entrant: Consumer Preference Inconsistencies in Costly Price Offers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1