Transforming interprofessional pedagogies: Pivoting from the flipped classroom to an online approach

Steven Taylor , Janice A. Odiaga , Theresa Gierlowski , Mary Jo Guglielmo , Lauren M. Little , Grisel Rodríguez-Morales , Lynette Richter , Samantha Souza
{"title":"Transforming interprofessional pedagogies: Pivoting from the flipped classroom to an online approach","authors":"Steven Taylor ,&nbsp;Janice A. Odiaga ,&nbsp;Theresa Gierlowski ,&nbsp;Mary Jo Guglielmo ,&nbsp;Lauren M. Little ,&nbsp;Grisel Rodríguez-Morales ,&nbsp;Lynette Richter ,&nbsp;Samantha Souza","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The COVID-19 pandemic prompted increased use of online education, including for interprofessional education (IPE). This study evaluates the comparative efficacy of two pedagogical approaches (i.e., flipped classroom, and 100 % online education) used to deliver a two semester long, IPE course offered at a large academic medical center. Through this quasi-experimental investigation of retrospective outcomes, this study compares the impact of these two pedological approaches on student learning outcomes. Pre- and post-course </span><em>Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey</em><span> (ICCAS) student scores were collected across two academic years where either the flipped-classroom approach or online approach was utilized, 2019–2020 (n = 442) and 2020–2021 (n = 515) respectively. Using a general linear model, changes in total mean ICCAS scores were determined; then t-tests assessed for item level changes. Findings from this study reinforce the idea that 100 % online learning is not only possible for IPE but is a powerful way to engage learners from differing professions.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100683"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240545262300085X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted increased use of online education, including for interprofessional education (IPE). This study evaluates the comparative efficacy of two pedagogical approaches (i.e., flipped classroom, and 100 % online education) used to deliver a two semester long, IPE course offered at a large academic medical center. Through this quasi-experimental investigation of retrospective outcomes, this study compares the impact of these two pedological approaches on student learning outcomes. Pre- and post-course Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS) student scores were collected across two academic years where either the flipped-classroom approach or online approach was utilized, 2019–2020 (n = 442) and 2020–2021 (n = 515) respectively. Using a general linear model, changes in total mean ICCAS scores were determined; then t-tests assessed for item level changes. Findings from this study reinforce the idea that 100 % online learning is not only possible for IPE but is a powerful way to engage learners from differing professions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转变跨专业教学法:从翻转课堂转向在线教学
新冠肺炎大流行促使更多地使用在线教育,包括跨专业教育(IPE)。这项研究评估了两种教学方法(即翻转课堂和100%在线教育)的比较效果,这两种方法用于在大型学术医疗中心提供为期两个学期的IPE课程。通过对回顾性结果的准实验调查,本研究比较了这两种恋童学方法对学生学习结果的影响。课程前和课程后的跨专业合作能力成就调查(ICCAS)分别在2019-2020(n=442)和2020-2021(n=515)两个学年收集了采用翻转课堂方法或在线方法的学生成绩。使用一般线性模型,确定ICCAS总分的变化;然后对项目水平的变化进行t检验。这项研究的结果强化了这样一种观点,即100%的在线学习不仅对IPE来说是可能的,而且是吸引不同专业学习者的一种强大方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
期刊最新文献
Watch a therapist get sued: A medicolegal interprofessional simulation on rehabilitation therapy documentation Interprofessional values and ethics curriculum for first year health professions students Increasing interprofessional education experiences and collaboration: Outcomes of a virtually-based continuing education program Getting everyone on the same page: Assessing interprofessional competencies during student placements Preparing health care learners using an interprofessional virtual simulation: A team-based community intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1