Health disparities in the treatment of bipolar disorder

Vladimir Tchikrizov , Mark E. Ladner , Felicia V. Caples , Mitzi Morris , Hailey Spillers , Christina D. Jordan , Joyce E. Balls-Berry , Monica J. Taylor-Desir , Mark A. Frye , Eric J. Vallender
{"title":"Health disparities in the treatment of bipolar disorder","authors":"Vladimir Tchikrizov ,&nbsp;Mark E. Ladner ,&nbsp;Felicia V. Caples ,&nbsp;Mitzi Morris ,&nbsp;Hailey Spillers ,&nbsp;Christina D. Jordan ,&nbsp;Joyce E. Balls-Berry ,&nbsp;Monica J. Taylor-Desir ,&nbsp;Mark A. Frye ,&nbsp;Eric J. Vallender","doi":"10.1016/j.pmip.2023.100101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Therapeutic options for bipolar disorder vary based on individual presentation and phase of illness. In addition to well documented disparities in diagnosis, racial and gender differences in treatment complicate efforts to provide effective individualized treatment to patients with bipolar disorder. The present work was undertaken to identify the persistence of racial and gender disparities across diverse community and national populations and to compare treatment disparities in bipolar disorder with those observed for schizophrenia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Commonly prescribed treatments for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia were quantified using information gathered from the All of Us Research Program and de-identified electronic health records at the University of Mississippi Medical Center.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Black patients with bipolar disorder, in comparison to white patients, had significantly less utilization of lithium, lamotrigine, and antidepressants, but greater utilization of haloperidol and other first-generation antipsychotics. Disparities in antipsychotic use were reduced in patients with schizophrenia compared to those with a bipolar diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The disparities enumerated here have real world clinical implications. Black patients with bipolar disorder have less utilization of lithium, the gold standard mood stabilization treatment. Further community-guided research to better understand the origins of these disparities and clinical trials to evaluate non-antipsychotic mood stabilization treatment for bipolar disorder across populations is warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19837,"journal":{"name":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468171723000029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Therapeutic options for bipolar disorder vary based on individual presentation and phase of illness. In addition to well documented disparities in diagnosis, racial and gender differences in treatment complicate efforts to provide effective individualized treatment to patients with bipolar disorder. The present work was undertaken to identify the persistence of racial and gender disparities across diverse community and national populations and to compare treatment disparities in bipolar disorder with those observed for schizophrenia.

Methods

Commonly prescribed treatments for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia were quantified using information gathered from the All of Us Research Program and de-identified electronic health records at the University of Mississippi Medical Center.

Results

Black patients with bipolar disorder, in comparison to white patients, had significantly less utilization of lithium, lamotrigine, and antidepressants, but greater utilization of haloperidol and other first-generation antipsychotics. Disparities in antipsychotic use were reduced in patients with schizophrenia compared to those with a bipolar diagnosis.

Conclusions

The disparities enumerated here have real world clinical implications. Black patients with bipolar disorder have less utilization of lithium, the gold standard mood stabilization treatment. Further community-guided research to better understand the origins of these disparities and clinical trials to evaluate non-antipsychotic mood stabilization treatment for bipolar disorder across populations is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双相情感障碍治疗中的健康差异
背景双相情感障碍的治疗选择因个人表现和疾病阶段而异。除了有充分记录的诊断差异外,治疗中的种族和性别差异也使为双相情感障碍患者提供有效个性化治疗的努力复杂化。本研究旨在确定不同社区和国家人群中种族和性别差异的持续性,并将双相情感障碍的治疗差异与精神分裂症的治疗差异进行比较。方法使用从All of Us研究项目收集的信息和密西西比大学医学中心的电子健康记录对双相情感障碍和精神分裂症的常用处方治疗进行量化。结果与白人患者相比,黑人双相情感疾病患者对锂、拉莫三嗪、,和抗抑郁药,但氟哌啶醇和其他第一代抗精神病药物的利用率更高。与双相诊断患者相比,精神分裂症患者使用抗精神病药物的差异有所减少。结论这里列举的差异具有现实世界中的临床意义。患有双相情感障碍的黑人患者较少使用锂,锂是情绪稳定治疗的黄金标准。有必要进行进一步的社区指导研究,以更好地了解这些差异的起源,并进行临床试验,评估非抗精神病药物情绪稳定治疗双相情感障碍的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy as an adjunctive treatment for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review The role of meta-cognitive and emotional beliefs, and negative repetitive thinking in the relationship between emotional abuse and psychological distress in psychiatric outpatients: A serial multiple mediation model Low handgrip strength is a risk factor for symptoms of anxiety and depression in survivors breast cancer patients BDNF blood levels as a potential biomarker Predictor of treatment response and remission in bipolar depression Erratum regarding missing ethical statements in previously published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1