Decomposing a pre- post-test outcome to measure the effect of cooperative learning on student achievement

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS International Review of Economics Education Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.iree.2023.100274
Tisha L.N. Emerson , KimMarie McGoldrick , Jamie Wagner
{"title":"Decomposing a pre- post-test outcome to measure the effect of cooperative learning on student achievement","authors":"Tisha L.N. Emerson ,&nbsp;KimMarie McGoldrick ,&nbsp;Jamie Wagner","doi":"10.1016/j.iree.2023.100274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Using a quasi-experimental research design, we examine the efficacy of one type of cooperative learning pedagogy (think-pair-share exercises) in the microeconomic principles course. Students in the treatment group engaged in think-pair-share exercises with an assigned partner throughout the semester. Those in the control completed the same exercises but did so individually. All students took the Test of Understanding in College Economics (TUCE) at the beginning and end of the semester to allow us to determine any achievement gains and whether these gains differ by treatment. Following Walstad and Wagner (2016) and Smith and Wagner (2018), we decompose </span>student performance to consider positive learning – adjusting for guessing – on the TUCE. We find no significant effect of cooperative learning on guessing-adjusted positive learning measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45496,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics Education","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics Education","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388023000154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a quasi-experimental research design, we examine the efficacy of one type of cooperative learning pedagogy (think-pair-share exercises) in the microeconomic principles course. Students in the treatment group engaged in think-pair-share exercises with an assigned partner throughout the semester. Those in the control completed the same exercises but did so individually. All students took the Test of Understanding in College Economics (TUCE) at the beginning and end of the semester to allow us to determine any achievement gains and whether these gains differ by treatment. Following Walstad and Wagner (2016) and Smith and Wagner (2018), we decompose student performance to consider positive learning – adjusting for guessing – on the TUCE. We find no significant effect of cooperative learning on guessing-adjusted positive learning measures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分解测试前后的结果来衡量合作学习对学生成绩的影响
采用准实验研究设计,我们检验了一种合作学习教学法(思维配对分享练习)在微观经济学原理课程中的有效性。参与思维配对的治疗组学生在整个学期与指定的搭档分享练习。对照组完成了同样的练习,但都是单独完成的。所有学生在学期初和期末都参加了大学经济学理解测试(TUCE),以便我们确定任何成就的收获,以及这些收获是否因治疗而异。继Walstad和Wagner(2016)以及Smith和Wagner(2018)之后,我们对学生的表现进行了分解,以考虑在TUCE上的积极学习——根据猜测进行调整。我们发现合作学习对猜测调整的积极学习测量没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
26
审稿时长
28 days
期刊最新文献
Equity in hybrid microeconomics classes: Effects on diverse student groups Measuring economic graph competence Improving student outcomes using automated feedback in a first-year economics class Turn the camera on to get better grade: Evidence from a field experiment Environmental economics in the wild: Using long-form journalism and other mass media in the classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1