Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria

Niranjika Wijesooriya , Arianna Brambilla , Lina Markauskaite
{"title":"Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria","authors":"Niranjika Wijesooriya ,&nbsp;Arianna Brambilla ,&nbsp;Lina Markauskaite","doi":"10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Environmentally sustainable design approach is characterised using design frameworks, a pre-determined set of criteria guiding designs to achieve sustainability provided in way of. green building rating tools. Recently, these green building design outcomes were criticised for lack of emphasis on human nature connectedness where biophilic design was identified as an approach that enhance nature connectedness. There is a growing trend in the building industry to incorporate biophilic design criteria into green building rating tools. However, the sustainable design approach is highly quantitative whereas biophilic design is qualitative. Hence, thorough understanding of both frameworks is required to develop a design framework overcoming the compatibility challenges. Furthermore, unlike the large volume of literature on green building rating tools, biophilic design frameworks are scarcely studied.</p><p>Therefore, the aim of this paper is to fill this gap by 1) conducting the first analysis of all the current biophilic design frameworks to explore their structure and development techniques; and 2) examining the compatibility of biophilic criteria within frameworks with typical sustainable design criteria.</p><p>The study presents a review of biophilic design frameworks identified through an extensive literature review followed by content analysis to find the development stages, techniques, and compatibility with sustainability criteria. Our analysis of seven biophilic frameworks revealed four techniques that were used to develop themes for categories, criteria, design strategies and building components. These techniques are: 1) literature synthesis, 2) framework synthesis, 3) interdisciplinary ideation, and 4) expert knowledge. Biophilic framework criteria has an average of 43% compatibility with green building rating tool criteria. It can be concluded that biophilic design is a sensory place-making approach and sustainable design is a building performance-based approach with opportunities for compatibility. The findings assist to understand the techniques in developing a biophilic design framework compatible with sustainable design approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100255,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Production Letters","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100033"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Production Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Environmentally sustainable design approach is characterised using design frameworks, a pre-determined set of criteria guiding designs to achieve sustainability provided in way of. green building rating tools. Recently, these green building design outcomes were criticised for lack of emphasis on human nature connectedness where biophilic design was identified as an approach that enhance nature connectedness. There is a growing trend in the building industry to incorporate biophilic design criteria into green building rating tools. However, the sustainable design approach is highly quantitative whereas biophilic design is qualitative. Hence, thorough understanding of both frameworks is required to develop a design framework overcoming the compatibility challenges. Furthermore, unlike the large volume of literature on green building rating tools, biophilic design frameworks are scarcely studied.

Therefore, the aim of this paper is to fill this gap by 1) conducting the first analysis of all the current biophilic design frameworks to explore their structure and development techniques; and 2) examining the compatibility of biophilic criteria within frameworks with typical sustainable design criteria.

The study presents a review of biophilic design frameworks identified through an extensive literature review followed by content analysis to find the development stages, techniques, and compatibility with sustainability criteria. Our analysis of seven biophilic frameworks revealed four techniques that were used to develop themes for categories, criteria, design strategies and building components. These techniques are: 1) literature synthesis, 2) framework synthesis, 3) interdisciplinary ideation, and 4) expert knowledge. Biophilic framework criteria has an average of 43% compatibility with green building rating tool criteria. It can be concluded that biophilic design is a sensory place-making approach and sustainable design is a building performance-based approach with opportunities for compatibility. The findings assist to understand the techniques in developing a biophilic design framework compatible with sustainable design approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲生物设计框架:结构、开发技术及其与LEED可持续设计标准的兼容性综述
环境可持续设计方法的特点是使用设计框架,这是一套预先确定的标准,指导设计以实现可持续性。绿色建筑评级工具。最近,这些绿色建筑设计成果因缺乏对人性连通性的重视而受到批评,亲生物设计被认为是一种增强自然连通性的方法。在建筑行业,将亲生物设计标准纳入绿色建筑评级工具的趋势越来越大。然而,可持续设计方法是高度定量的,而亲生物设计是定性的。因此,开发一个克服兼容性挑战的设计框架需要对这两个框架有深入的了解。此外,与大量关于绿色建筑评级工具的文献不同,亲生物设计框架很少被研究。因此,本文的目的是通过以下方式填补这一空白:1)对当前所有亲生物设计框架进行首次分析,以探索其结构和开发技术;以及2)检查框架内亲生物标准与典型可持续设计标准的兼容性。该研究通过广泛的文献综述和内容分析,对亲生物设计框架进行了综述,以确定其发展阶段、技术和与可持续性标准的兼容性。我们对七个亲生物框架的分析揭示了四种用于开发类别、标准、设计策略和建筑组件主题的技术。这些技术是:1)文献综合,2)框架综合,3)跨学科思维,以及4)专家知识。亲生物框架标准与绿色建筑评级工具标准的兼容性平均为43%。可以得出的结论是,亲生物设计是一种感官场所营造方法,而可持续设计则是一种基于建筑性能的方法,具有兼容性。这些发现有助于理解开发与可持续设计方法兼容的亲生物设计框架的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive analysis of sustainable fertilizer-related publications within the context of circular economy: Insights from the field of business management Strategic marketing of sustainable fashion: Exploring approaches and contradictions in the positioning of fashion rental Spatiotemporal dynamics of the water footprint and virtual water trade in global cotton production and trade Consumers perspectives on biobased products: A scoping review Adopting a green strategy and related practices: Lessons from small food establishments in an emerging economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1