Geoenvironmental GIS development to investigate Landslides and Slope Instability along Frontal zone of Central Himalaya

Pradeep Kumar Rawat, Bhawana Pant
{"title":"Geoenvironmental GIS development to investigate Landslides and Slope Instability along Frontal zone of Central Himalaya","authors":"Pradeep Kumar Rawat,&nbsp;Bhawana Pant","doi":"10.1016/j.nhres.2023.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Frontal Himalayan terrain comprises of Lesser Himalaya and Siwalik Hills; is highly susceptible to landslide disaster due to active tectonics, scrappy geology, steep slope, and reshaping geomorphology. Besides that, hydrological impacts of land use degradation and climate change enhancing the vulnerability of the terrain. Keep in view this; the Dabka watershed, falls in frontal zone of central Himalaya has been selected for case illustration. Geospatial analysis advocates that the areas of the most stressed geo-environment (comprises of very steep slopes above 30°, geology of Lower Krol and Lariakanta formation, geomorphology of moist areas and debris sites and land use of barren land) have high density (5–10 landsides km<sup>2</sup>) of landslides whereas the areas of least stressed geo-environment (comprises of gentle slopes below 10°, geology of Kailakhan and Siwalik formation, geomorphology of depositional terraces and land use of dense forest) have low density of landslides (2 landsides km<sup>2</sup>). Out of total 340 landslides in the region, 198 are active landsides whereas 51 and 91 are reactivated and old landsides respectively. Geospatial analysis of landslide areas reveals that across the region total 804.33 ​ha land has been degraded by landslides which account for 11.65% of the total area of the Dabka watershed. The wedge failure analysis suggests that there are 3–4 sets of rock joints across the region and most of the sites are unsafe as their safety factors are less than 1.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100943,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards Research","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 196-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666592123000276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Frontal Himalayan terrain comprises of Lesser Himalaya and Siwalik Hills; is highly susceptible to landslide disaster due to active tectonics, scrappy geology, steep slope, and reshaping geomorphology. Besides that, hydrological impacts of land use degradation and climate change enhancing the vulnerability of the terrain. Keep in view this; the Dabka watershed, falls in frontal zone of central Himalaya has been selected for case illustration. Geospatial analysis advocates that the areas of the most stressed geo-environment (comprises of very steep slopes above 30°, geology of Lower Krol and Lariakanta formation, geomorphology of moist areas and debris sites and land use of barren land) have high density (5–10 landsides km2) of landslides whereas the areas of least stressed geo-environment (comprises of gentle slopes below 10°, geology of Kailakhan and Siwalik formation, geomorphology of depositional terraces and land use of dense forest) have low density of landslides (2 landsides km2). Out of total 340 landslides in the region, 198 are active landsides whereas 51 and 91 are reactivated and old landsides respectively. Geospatial analysis of landslide areas reveals that across the region total 804.33 ​ha land has been degraded by landslides which account for 11.65% of the total area of the Dabka watershed. The wedge failure analysis suggests that there are 3–4 sets of rock joints across the region and most of the sites are unsafe as their safety factors are less than 1.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地理环境地理信息系统开发研究喜马拉雅中部锋带滑坡和边坡失稳
喜马拉雅山脉正面地形包括小喜马拉雅山和西瓦利克山;由于构造活跃、地质破碎、斜坡陡峭、地貌重塑,极易发生滑坡灾害。除此之外,土地利用退化和气候变化的水文影响加剧了地形的脆弱性。请注意这一点;Dabka流域,位于喜马拉雅山脉中部的锋面地带。地理空间分析认为,地质环境压力最大的地区(包括30°以上的陡坡、Lower Krol和Lariakanta地层的地质、潮湿地区和碎屑地的地貌以及贫瘠土地的土地利用)滑坡密度高(5-10个陆侧km2),而地质环境压力最小的地区(包括10°以下的缓坡、Kailakhan和Siwalik组的地质、沉积阶地的地貌和茂密森林的土地利用)滑坡密度较低(2个滑坡面km2)。在该地区总共340处山体滑坡中,198处为活动滑坡,51处和91处分别为复活滑坡和旧滑坡。滑坡区域的地理空间分析显示,整个区域共有804.33​ha土地因滑坡而退化,滑坡面积占Dabka流域总面积的11.65%。楔形破坏分析表明,该地区有3-4组岩石节理,大多数场地都是不安全的,因为它们的安全系数小于1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A review on the extreme rainfall studies in India Socioeconomic impacts of flooding and its coping strategies in Nigeria: Evidence from Dagiri community, Gwagwalada area council of Abuja Ecosysem-based approach to local flood risk management in Ogun State, Nigeria: Knowledge, and pathway to Actualisation Comprehensive seismic hazard assessment for Guwahati City, Northeast India: Insights from probabilistic and deterministic seismic hazard analysis Source characteristics of earthquakes in Delhi and its vicinity: Implications for seismogenesis in the stable continental region of India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1