Examining student ICT use and learning outcomes: Evidence from Japanese PISA data

IF 5.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers and Education Open Pub Date : 2023-05-19 DOI:10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100141
Jean-Baptiste M.B. SANFO
{"title":"Examining student ICT use and learning outcomes: Evidence from Japanese PISA data","authors":"Jean-Baptiste M.B. SANFO","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The relationship between student ICT use and learning outcomes is being debated. Few studies on the topic examined different forms of ICT use and heterogenous relationships with learning outcomes. This study addresses this gap by examining the association between different forms of ICT use and learning outcomes and by exploring variations in associations based on student-perceived ICT competence and across the learning distribution. The Japanese sample of PISA 2018 data was analyzed employing a regression approach accounting for the complexity of the PISA design and unconditional quantile regression. Results suggest that the variables student ICT use outside school for schoolwork activities and at school in general are not statistically related to reading and science achievements, but the former is weakly related to mathematics. The two forms of ICT use improve learning among students with lower ICT competence and also show statistical significance for low- and high-achieving students. Moreover, subject-related uses of ICT during lessons and outside lessons are positively associated with the three measures of learning achievements investigated. The association remains consistent by student ICT competence and across the learning distribution. In contrast, ICT use outside of school for leisure is negatively associated with all three measures of learning achievements. The association remains negative by student ICT competence and across the learning distribution. These findings suggest that education stakeholders promoting student ICT use should be cautious by considering forms of ICT use, student ICT competence, and heterogenous abilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100141"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557323000198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between student ICT use and learning outcomes is being debated. Few studies on the topic examined different forms of ICT use and heterogenous relationships with learning outcomes. This study addresses this gap by examining the association between different forms of ICT use and learning outcomes and by exploring variations in associations based on student-perceived ICT competence and across the learning distribution. The Japanese sample of PISA 2018 data was analyzed employing a regression approach accounting for the complexity of the PISA design and unconditional quantile regression. Results suggest that the variables student ICT use outside school for schoolwork activities and at school in general are not statistically related to reading and science achievements, but the former is weakly related to mathematics. The two forms of ICT use improve learning among students with lower ICT competence and also show statistical significance for low- and high-achieving students. Moreover, subject-related uses of ICT during lessons and outside lessons are positively associated with the three measures of learning achievements investigated. The association remains consistent by student ICT competence and across the learning distribution. In contrast, ICT use outside of school for leisure is negatively associated with all three measures of learning achievements. The association remains negative by student ICT competence and across the learning distribution. These findings suggest that education stakeholders promoting student ICT use should be cautious by considering forms of ICT use, student ICT competence, and heterogenous abilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考察学生信息通信技术的使用和学习成果:来自日本PISA数据的证据
学生使用信息和通信技术与学习成果之间的关系正在争论之中。很少有关于这一主题的研究考察信息和通信技术使用的不同形式以及与学习成果的异质关系。这项研究通过研究不同形式的信息和通信技术使用与学习结果之间的关联,并根据学生感知的信息和通讯技术能力和整个学习分布,探索关联的变化,来解决这一差距。PISA 2018数据的日本样本采用回归方法进行分析,考虑到PISA设计的复杂性和无条件分位数回归。结果表明,学生在校外和学校使用信息通信技术进行作业活动的变量与阅读和科学成绩没有统计学相关性,但前者与数学的相关性较弱。这两种形式的信息通信技术的使用改善了信息通信技术能力较低的学生的学习,对成绩较差和成绩较高的学生也具有统计学意义。此外,在课程期间和课外使用信息和通信技术与所调查的学习成绩的三个衡量标准呈正相关。根据学生的信息和通信技术能力和整个学习分布,这种联系保持一致。相比之下,校外休闲使用信息和通信技术与学习成绩的所有三个指标都呈负相关。从学生的信息和通信技术能力和整个学习分布来看,这种联系仍然是负面的。这些研究结果表明,促进学生使用信息和通信技术的教育利益相关者应谨慎考虑信息和通信技能的使用形式、学生的信息和通信能力以及异质能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning personalization in block-based programming languages using clustering and static code analysis Design and validation of a questionnaire on teachers' uses of generative artificial intelligence An experimental study exploring human–AI complementarity in early social-emotional learning Harnessing artificial intelligence for preservice teachers’ development: A scoping review of applications, benefits, and challenges Longitudinal insights into AI in education: Usage, ethics, and policy development in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1