Preserving the medial arm of the iliofemoral ligament in total hip arthroplasty using the anterolateral approach: Surgical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measure with 2 years follow-up

Yoshifumi Harada , Yuji Yamamoto , Kazuki Oishi , Ryo Inoue , Koichi Akaishi , Yasuyuki Ishibashi
{"title":"Preserving the medial arm of the iliofemoral ligament in total hip arthroplasty using the anterolateral approach: Surgical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measure with 2 years follow-up","authors":"Yoshifumi Harada ,&nbsp;Yuji Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Kazuki Oishi ,&nbsp;Ryo Inoue ,&nbsp;Koichi Akaishi ,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Ishibashi","doi":"10.1016/j.jjoisr.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Iliofemoral ligament (ILFL) is a capsular ligament located in the anterosuperior part of the hip joint capsule and contributes to hip joint stability. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of resection versus preservation procedure of the medial arm of the ILFL in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the anterolateral approach.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Perioperative outcomes, complication, implant placement and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were evaluated in 42 patients in the resection group and 38 patients in the preservation group. As a PROM, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), was administered at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes, complication and implant placement between the two groups. Satisfaction for the hip joint condition (80.6 ​± ​22.4 vs 89.2 ​± ​20.1), JHEQ pain score (21.5 ​± ​4.5 vs 24.1 ​± ​5.2) at 6 months, and JHEQ pain score (21.6 ​± ​5.1 vs 23.5 ​± ​5.5) at 1 year were significantly better in the preservation group than in the resection group. At 2 years postoperatively, no significant difference was found in PROMs between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results indicate that preservation of the medial arm of the ILFL in THA improves pain during the first postoperative year without increased complications or disadvantages of implant placement. Preserving the medial arm of the ILFL may be a safe and effective option to improve the early clinical outcomes after THA using the anterolateral approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","volume":"2 ","pages":"Pages 168-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705123000221/pdfft?md5=3a901c2b493636dc3212985b331dacaf&pid=1-s2.0-S2949705123000221-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705123000221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Iliofemoral ligament (ILFL) is a capsular ligament located in the anterosuperior part of the hip joint capsule and contributes to hip joint stability. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of resection versus preservation procedure of the medial arm of the ILFL in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the anterolateral approach.

Methods

Perioperative outcomes, complication, implant placement and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were evaluated in 42 patients in the resection group and 38 patients in the preservation group. As a PROM, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), was administered at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively.

Results

There was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes, complication and implant placement between the two groups. Satisfaction for the hip joint condition (80.6 ​± ​22.4 vs 89.2 ​± ​20.1), JHEQ pain score (21.5 ​± ​4.5 vs 24.1 ​± ​5.2) at 6 months, and JHEQ pain score (21.6 ​± ​5.1 vs 23.5 ​± ​5.5) at 1 year were significantly better in the preservation group than in the resection group. At 2 years postoperatively, no significant difference was found in PROMs between the two groups.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that preservation of the medial arm of the ILFL in THA improves pain during the first postoperative year without increased complications or disadvantages of implant placement. Preserving the medial arm of the ILFL may be a safe and effective option to improve the early clinical outcomes after THA using the anterolateral approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前外侧入路全髋关节置换术中保留髂股韧带内侧臂:手术结果和患者报告的2年随访结果
目的股外侧韧带(ILFL)是一种位于髋关节囊前上部的囊膜韧带,有助于髋关节的稳定性。本研究的目的是比较在使用前外侧入路的全髋关节置换术(THA)中,切除和保留ILFL内侧臂的手术结果。方法对42例切除组患者和38例保存组患者的围手术期结果、并发症、植入位置和患者报告的预后指标(PROM)进行评估。作为PROM,日本骨科协会髋关节疾病评估问卷(JHEQ)在术后6个月、1年和2年进行。结果两组患者的围手术期结果、并发症及植入位置无显著差异。髋关节状况满意度(80.6​±​22.4对89.2​±​20.1),JHEQ疼痛评分(21.5​±​4.5对24.1​±​5.2)和JHEQ疼痛评分(21.6​±​5.1对23.5​±​5.5)在1年时在保存组中明显优于切除组。术后2年,两组胎膜早破的发生率无显著差异。结论我们的研究结果表明,在THA中保留ILFL的内侧臂可以改善术后第一年的疼痛,而不会增加植入物的并发症或缺点。保留ILFL的内侧臂可能是使用前外侧入路改善THA后早期临床结果的安全有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radiological evaluation of coronal femoral and tibial morphology and coronal limb alignment in windswept deformity of the knee Lateral extra-articular procedures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Narrative review on current evidence Predictive symptoms associated with the development of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a 10-year longitudinal study from the Iwaki cohort Achievement of minimal clinically important difference in shoulder function after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study Classification of coronal plane alignment of arthritic and healthy knees in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1