Coordinated activity and common ground during group problem solving in biology

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning Culture and Social Interaction Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100767
Anna F. DeJarnette , Stephanie M. Rollmann , Dieter F. Vanderelst , John E. Layne
{"title":"Coordinated activity and common ground during group problem solving in biology","authors":"Anna F. DeJarnette ,&nbsp;Stephanie M. Rollmann ,&nbsp;Dieter F. Vanderelst ,&nbsp;John E. Layne","doi":"10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For groupwork to support learning it requires that students establish mutual knowledge, which is information that becomes shared among all group members. In this study, we analyzed the verbal interactions of two groups of high school students working on a color vision activity. Students within a group each wore different color-filtering goggles, and compared their individual perceptions to identify various colors they viewed together. Because the color-filtering goggles gave each student different information related to the task, sharing knowledge was necessary for successful color recognition. Our analysis was guided by the questions, <em>how did students establish mutual knowledge through their talk</em>? And, <em>what types of knowledge were shared through these processes</em>? We found that students were more inclined to explain—including providing warrants for their claims—when they used discussion moves such as asking each other questions, reacting to each other's statements, and incorporating multiple perspectives. Practical interventions designed to teach students to work productively in groups should attend to expectations around the content of students' talk in addition to the range of talk moves that students can use to contribute to a discussion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46850,"journal":{"name":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100767"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210656123000831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For groupwork to support learning it requires that students establish mutual knowledge, which is information that becomes shared among all group members. In this study, we analyzed the verbal interactions of two groups of high school students working on a color vision activity. Students within a group each wore different color-filtering goggles, and compared their individual perceptions to identify various colors they viewed together. Because the color-filtering goggles gave each student different information related to the task, sharing knowledge was necessary for successful color recognition. Our analysis was guided by the questions, how did students establish mutual knowledge through their talk? And, what types of knowledge were shared through these processes? We found that students were more inclined to explain—including providing warrants for their claims—when they used discussion moves such as asking each other questions, reacting to each other's statements, and incorporating multiple perspectives. Practical interventions designed to teach students to work productively in groups should attend to expectations around the content of students' talk in addition to the range of talk moves that students can use to contribute to a discussion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物学群体问题解决过程中的协调活动与共同点
为了支持学习,小组工作要求学生建立相互知识,即所有小组成员之间共享的信息。在这项研究中,我们分析了两组从事色觉活动的高中生的言语互动。一组学生中的每个人都戴着不同的滤色镜,并比较他们的个人感知,以识别他们一起看到的各种颜色。由于滤色镜为每个学生提供了与任务相关的不同信息,因此共享知识对于成功的颜色识别是必要的。我们的分析以以下问题为指导:学生们是如何通过谈话建立相互知识的?通过这些过程共享了哪些类型的知识?我们发现,当学生们使用讨论动作时,比如互相提问、对对方的陈述做出反应以及融入多个角度时,他们更倾向于解释,包括为自己的主张提供证据。旨在教会学生在小组中富有成效地工作的实际干预措施,除了学生可以用来促进讨论的一系列谈话动作外,还应该关注对学生谈话内容的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Culture and Social Interaction
Learning Culture and Social Interaction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
Investigating upper-secondary school learners' contributions in co-regulation and socially shared regulation during collaborative learning A dynamic systems examination of the impact of peers on educator–infant synchrony within joint attention interactions in an early childhood room Authority and positionings in elementary mathematics: An interactional ethnographic approach Peer interactions in 4/6-month-old infants: From motor development to multimodal communication Egalitarian dialogue and student participation in Learning Communities. The case of the Coquimbo Region, Chile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1