How Does Constructive Feedback in an Educational Game Sound to Children?

Daeun Hwang, Younah Kang
{"title":"How Does Constructive Feedback in an Educational Game Sound to Children?","authors":"Daeun Hwang,&nbsp;Younah Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.100581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Educational games are effective tools for children, as they naturally increase their motivation and engagement. While previous studies have revealed the varying influences of different types of feedback in education, there has been a lack of attention to the design of constructive feedback in educational games. This study involves a 2 (peer and adult voice) × 3 (verification, encouragement, and elaboration type) factorial design to observe how different voices and types of feedback affect children’s performance, retention, inquisitiveness, impressions, and emotional reactions while playing a math game designed for preschoolers called <em>MathSoup</em><span>. The significance of the different types of feedback was analyzed through a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-squared tests, and observation during the game sessions. This study also discusses the implications and insights driven by children’s reactions to certain types of feedback and how they perceive game characters.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":38431,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 100581"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212868923000181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educational games are effective tools for children, as they naturally increase their motivation and engagement. While previous studies have revealed the varying influences of different types of feedback in education, there has been a lack of attention to the design of constructive feedback in educational games. This study involves a 2 (peer and adult voice) × 3 (verification, encouragement, and elaboration type) factorial design to observe how different voices and types of feedback affect children’s performance, retention, inquisitiveness, impressions, and emotional reactions while playing a math game designed for preschoolers called MathSoup. The significance of the different types of feedback was analyzed through a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-squared tests, and observation during the game sessions. This study also discusses the implications and insights driven by children’s reactions to certain types of feedback and how they perceive game characters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育游戏中的建设性反馈对孩子们来说如何?
教育游戏是孩子们的有效工具,因为它们自然会增加他们的动力和参与度。虽然先前的研究揭示了不同类型的反馈在教育中的不同影响,但在教育游戏中缺乏对建设性反馈设计的关注。本研究采用2(同伴和成人声音)×3(验证、鼓励和阐述型)析因设计,观察不同的声音和反馈类型如何影响儿童在玩一款名为MathSoup的学龄前儿童数学游戏时的表现、记忆力、好奇心、印象和情绪反应。通过双向方差分析(ANOVA)、卡方检验和游戏期间的观察来分析不同类型反馈的显著性。这项研究还讨论了儿童对某些类型反馈的反应所产生的影响和见解,以及他们如何感知游戏角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Children exploring circuits and identities in the figured world of a makerspace Participatory design of an eco-feedback tool with teens for community energy futures Increasing the impact of child-computer interaction research: The Translational Research Engagement Framework (TREF) Editorial Board Engaging the next generation of Child–Computer Interaction researchers: Teaching CCI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1