Subjective assessment for an advanced driver assistance system: A case study in China

Di Ao;Jialin Li
{"title":"Subjective assessment for an advanced driver assistance system: A case study in China","authors":"Di Ao;Jialin Li","doi":"10.1108/JICV-11-2021-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - This study aims to propose a novel subjective assessment (SA) method for level 2 or level 21 advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) with a customized case study in China. Design/methodology/approach - The proposed SA method contains six dimensions, including perception, driveability and stability, riding comfort, human-machine interaction, driver workload and trustworthiness and exceptional operating case, respectively. And each dimension subordinates several subsections, which describe the corresponding details under this dimension. Findings - Based on the proposed SA, a case study in China is conducted. Six drivers with different driving experiences are invited to give their subjective ratings for each subsection according to a predefined rating standard. The rating results show that the ADAS from Tesla outperforms the upcoming electric vehicle in most cases. Originality/value - The proposed SA method is beneficial for the original equipment manufacturers developing related technologies in the future.","PeriodicalId":100793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles","volume":"5 2","pages":"112-122"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/9944931/10004541/10004549.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10004549/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to propose a novel subjective assessment (SA) method for level 2 or level 21 advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) with a customized case study in China. Design/methodology/approach - The proposed SA method contains six dimensions, including perception, driveability and stability, riding comfort, human-machine interaction, driver workload and trustworthiness and exceptional operating case, respectively. And each dimension subordinates several subsections, which describe the corresponding details under this dimension. Findings - Based on the proposed SA, a case study in China is conducted. Six drivers with different driving experiences are invited to give their subjective ratings for each subsection according to a predefined rating standard. The rating results show that the ADAS from Tesla outperforms the upcoming electric vehicle in most cases. Originality/value - The proposed SA method is beneficial for the original equipment manufacturers developing related technologies in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先进驾驶辅助系统的主观评价——以中国为例
目的——本研究旨在通过中国的定制案例研究,为2级或21级高级驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)提出一种新的主观评估(SA)方法。设计/方法/方法-所提出的SA方法包含六个维度,分别包括感知、驾驶性能和稳定性、乘坐舒适性、人机交互、驾驶员工作量和可信度以及特殊操作情况。每个维度都包含几个小节,这些小节描述了该维度下的相应细节。研究结果-基于所提出的SA,在中国进行了一个案例研究。邀请六名具有不同驾驶经验的驾驶员根据预定义的评分标准对每个小节进行主观评分。评级结果显示,特斯拉的ADAS在大多数情况下都优于即将推出的电动汽车。独创性/价值-所提出的SA方法有利于原始设备制造商在未来开发相关技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Front Cover AdvGLOW: Covert Adversarial Attacks Against Autonomous Driving Perception Autonomous Driving on Mountain Roads via an Adaptive Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach An Efficient Bidirectional Search Hybrid A* Method for Parking Path Planning in Adjacent Vehicle Deviation Scenarios to Enhance Passenger Comfort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1