On mnemonic instruction and the SHIELDS acronym in the pedagogy of first-order differential equations

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.1093/teamat/hry001
Christopher C Tisdell
{"title":"On mnemonic instruction and the SHIELDS acronym in the pedagogy of first-order differential equations","authors":"Christopher C Tisdell","doi":"10.1093/teamat/hry001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work we critically examine a mnemonic designed for the pedagogy of first-order ordinary differential equations. The particular mnemonic takes the form of the SHIELDS acronym. We perform a critical analysis on mnemonics, outlining some of their benefits and limitations from the literature. As a result, we propose a general mnemonic model that has the potential to move mnemonics from being viewed as a trick where learners parrot back information they do not understand towards a deeper, more conscious experience where learners are fostered to think beyond the mnemonic. The SHIELDS acronym is designed for learners and teachers to encode, store and recall the different types of first-order differential equations. We critically compare SHIELDS against our proposed mnemonic model. We see that the SHIELDS acronym is not a panacea that will magically solve differential equations. Rather it is designed to act as a trigger for students to initially classify the equations — with the onus on the student — to then solve these equations via appropriate mathematical techniques. To further engage in the debate on SHIELDS as a pedagogical tool, we shared the acronym with two types of audiences: those within the traditional university classroom through face-to-face lectures and a more global and diverse assemblage who accessed a short digital video online that was openly available. We examined their perspectives, reactions and comments associated with SHIELDS. After triangulation of data, we discovered that the vast majority of feedback received was positive. Feedback themes included perceptions of SHIELDS as a tool to counter anxiety and boost engagement and levels of interest, suggestions for SHIELDS to act as an instrument of the student within examinations, the efficacy of SHIELDS as a mnemonic and identifying the boundaries of SHIELDS.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/teamat/hry001","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8853494/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this work we critically examine a mnemonic designed for the pedagogy of first-order ordinary differential equations. The particular mnemonic takes the form of the SHIELDS acronym. We perform a critical analysis on mnemonics, outlining some of their benefits and limitations from the literature. As a result, we propose a general mnemonic model that has the potential to move mnemonics from being viewed as a trick where learners parrot back information they do not understand towards a deeper, more conscious experience where learners are fostered to think beyond the mnemonic. The SHIELDS acronym is designed for learners and teachers to encode, store and recall the different types of first-order differential equations. We critically compare SHIELDS against our proposed mnemonic model. We see that the SHIELDS acronym is not a panacea that will magically solve differential equations. Rather it is designed to act as a trigger for students to initially classify the equations — with the onus on the student — to then solve these equations via appropriate mathematical techniques. To further engage in the debate on SHIELDS as a pedagogical tool, we shared the acronym with two types of audiences: those within the traditional university classroom through face-to-face lectures and a more global and diverse assemblage who accessed a short digital video online that was openly available. We examined their perspectives, reactions and comments associated with SHIELDS. After triangulation of data, we discovered that the vast majority of feedback received was positive. Feedback themes included perceptions of SHIELDS as a tool to counter anxiety and boost engagement and levels of interest, suggestions for SHIELDS to act as an instrument of the student within examinations, the efficacy of SHIELDS as a mnemonic and identifying the boundaries of SHIELDS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一阶微分方程教学中的助记符教学和SHIELDS缩写
在这项工作中,我们批判性地研究了一种为一阶常微分方程教学法设计的助记符。特定的助记符采用SHIELDS首字母缩写的形式。我们对助记符进行了批判性分析,概述了文献中助记符的一些优点和局限性。因此,我们提出了一个通用的助记符模型,该模型有可能将助记符从被视为学习者鹦鹉学舌地复述他们不理解的信息的技巧转变为更深入、更有意识的体验,培养学习者超越助记符进行思考。SHIELDS首字母缩写是为学习者和教师设计的,用于编码、存储和回忆不同类型的一阶微分方程。我们将SHIELDS与我们提出的助记符模型进行了批判性的比较。我们看到,SHIELDS这个缩写词并不是神奇地解决微分方程的灵丹妙药。相反,它被设计成一个触发器,让学生最初对方程进行分类——学生有责任——然后通过适当的数学技术求解这些方程。为了进一步参与关于SHIELDS作为一种教学工具的辩论,我们与两种类型的受众分享了这个首字母缩写:一种是在传统大学课堂上通过面对面授课的受众,另一种是更全球化和多样化的群体,他们访问了一个公开的在线短数字视频。我们研究了他们对SHIELDS的看法、反应和评论。在对数据进行三角测量后,我们发现收到的绝大多数反馈都是积极的。反馈主题包括将SHIELDS视为一种对抗焦虑、提高参与度和兴趣水平的工具,建议SHIELDS在考试中充当学生的工具,SHIELDS作为助记符的功效,以及确定SHIELDS的边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Prevalence and predictors of hand hygiene compliance in clinical, surgical and intensive care unit wards: results of a second cross-sectional study at the Umberto I teaching hospital of Rome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1