University students’ fully digital study of mathematics: an identification of student-groups via their resources usage and a characterization by personal and affective characteristics

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1093/teamat/hrab020
Leander Kempen;Michael Liebendörfer
{"title":"University students’ fully digital study of mathematics: an identification of student-groups via their resources usage and a characterization by personal and affective characteristics","authors":"Leander Kempen;Michael Liebendörfer","doi":"10.1093/teamat/hrab020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigated university students’ study of mathematics in the digital setting context of the COVID-19 pandemic. We gathered data from a survey of 89 students enrolled in a ‘Linear Algebra 1’ course including affective variables, learning strategies, social relatedness and resources considered useful. The results indicate students’ high effort and self-regulation and a high variation in affective characteristics and social relatedness. All the traditional aspects of mathematics teaching (lecture, tutorials and lecture notes) were rated as particularly useful. In addition, the videos from external resources were rated as equally useful as the teaching team’s videos. In contrast, traditional literature such as textbooks was rarely considered useful. The most useful resource rated was communication with peers, underlining the important role of social learning despite fully digital learning environments. Finally, a cluster analysis based on students’ rated usefulness of the resources led to three different user-types. Whereas the ‘digitals’ find the external digital resources very useful (videos, webpages, etc.), the ‘traditionalists’ rate the digitalized traditional resources best (lecture, tutorials, etc.). All resources receive uniformly good ratings from a third group (‘all resource users’). We reflect on our findings in light of the pandemic and describe directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":44578,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9690931/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We investigated university students’ study of mathematics in the digital setting context of the COVID-19 pandemic. We gathered data from a survey of 89 students enrolled in a ‘Linear Algebra 1’ course including affective variables, learning strategies, social relatedness and resources considered useful. The results indicate students’ high effort and self-regulation and a high variation in affective characteristics and social relatedness. All the traditional aspects of mathematics teaching (lecture, tutorials and lecture notes) were rated as particularly useful. In addition, the videos from external resources were rated as equally useful as the teaching team’s videos. In contrast, traditional literature such as textbooks was rarely considered useful. The most useful resource rated was communication with peers, underlining the important role of social learning despite fully digital learning environments. Finally, a cluster analysis based on students’ rated usefulness of the resources led to three different user-types. Whereas the ‘digitals’ find the external digital resources very useful (videos, webpages, etc.), the ‘traditionalists’ rate the digitalized traditional resources best (lecture, tutorials, etc.). All resources receive uniformly good ratings from a third group (‘all resource users’). We reflect on our findings in light of the pandemic and describe directions for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学生数学全数字化学习:通过学生群体的资源使用识别学生群体,并通过个人和情感特征进行表征
我们调查了大学生在新冠肺炎大流行的数字背景下的数学学习。我们从一项对89名参加“线性代数1”课程的学生的调查中收集了数据,包括情感变量、学习策略、社会关系和被认为有用的资源。研究结果表明,学生的努力程度和自我调节能力较高,情感特征和社会关系差异较大。数学教学的所有传统方面(讲座、教程和讲义)都被评为特别有用。此外,来自外部资源的视频被评为与教学团队的视频同样有用。相比之下,教科书等传统文学很少被认为有用。被评为最有用的资源是与同龄人的沟通,强调了尽管学习环境完全数字化,但社会学习的重要作用。最后,基于学生对资源有用性的评分进行聚类分析,得出三种不同的用户类型。“数字化者”认为外部数字资源(视频、网页等)非常有用,而“传统主义者”则对数字化的传统资源(讲座、教程等)评价最高。所有资源都得到了第三组(“所有资源用户”)的一致好评。我们根据疫情反思我们的发现,并描述未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications
Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The journal provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and experiences which contribute to the improvement of mathematics teaching and learning for students from upper secondary/high school level through to university first degree level. A distinctive feature of the journal is its emphasis on the applications of mathematics and mathematical modelling within the context of mathematics education world-wide. The journal"s readership consists of mathematics teachers, students, researchers and those concerned with curriculum development and assessment, indeed anyone concerned about the education of users of mathematics.
期刊最新文献
Incorporating entrepreneurial skills into mathematics teaching in school Students’ ways of using video lectures in a linear algebra course Exploring the impact of gamification on engagement in a statistics classroom Lecturers don’t know everything: students listening to the thought processes of lecturers on unfamiliar ground An investigation of business calculus students’ covariational reasoning, procedural knowledge and conceptual knowledge in the context of price elasticity of demand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1