On the Minimum Weight Codewords of PAC Codes: The Impact of Pre-Transformation

Abstract

The minimum Hamming distance of a linear block code is the smallest number of bit changes required to transform one valid codeword into another. The code’s minimum distance determines the code’s error-correcting capabilities. Furthermore, The number of minimum weight codewords, a.k.a. error coefficient, gives a good comparative measure for the block error rate (BLER) of linear block codes with identical minimum distance, in particular at a high SNR regime under maximum likelihood (ML) decoding. A code with a smaller error coefficient would give a lower BLER. Unlike polar codes, a closed-form expression for the enumeration of the error coefficient of polarization-adjusted convolutional (PAC) codes is yet unknown. As PAC codes are convolutionally pre-transformed polar codes, we study the impact of pre-transformation on polar codes in terms of minimum Hamming distance and error coefficient by partitioning the codewords into cosets. We show that the minimum distance of PAC codes does not decrease; however, the pre-transformation may reduce the error coefficient depending on the choice of convolutional polynomial. We recognize the properties of the cosets where pre-transformation is ineffective in decreasing the error coefficient, giving a lower bound for the error coefficient. Then, we propose a low-complexity enumeration method that determines the number of minimum weight codewords of PAC codes relying on the error coefficient of polar codes. That is, given the error coefficient ${\mathcal {A}}_{w_{min}}$ of polar codes, we determine the reduction $X$ in the error coefficient due to convolutional pre-transformation in PAC coding and subtract it from the error coefficient of polar codes, ${\mathcal {A}}_{w_{min}}-X$ . Furthermore, we numerically analyze the tightness of the lower bound and the impact of the choice of the convolutional polynomial on the error coefficient based on the sub-patterns in the polynomial’s coefficients. Eventually, we show how we can further reduce the error coefficient in the cosets.