Comparison of four diesel engines with regard to blow-by aerosol properties as a basis for reduction strategies based on engine design and operation

Kai-Michael Scheiber, Niclas Nowak, Magnus Lukas Lorenz, Jürgen Pfeil, Thomas Koch, Gerhard Kasper
{"title":"Comparison of four diesel engines with regard to blow-by aerosol properties as a basis for reduction strategies based on engine design and operation","authors":"Kai-Michael Scheiber,&nbsp;Niclas Nowak,&nbsp;Magnus Lukas Lorenz,&nbsp;Jürgen Pfeil,&nbsp;Thomas Koch,&nbsp;Gerhard Kasper","doi":"10.1007/s41104-021-00075-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding how engine design and operation affect blow-by aerosol characteristics is key to reducing the emission of particulate matter (PM) via the crankcase ventilation system. To this end, representative aerosol data from four different diesel engines are compared on the basis of brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) and engine speed. The data were obtained from comparable sampling positions, using the same sampling system and optical particle counter. The discussion is based on the narrow particle size range of 0.4–1.3 µm, chosen for its significance with regard to blow-by aerosol sources, as well as for the challenges it poses for separation systems. Key findings include particle size distributions (PSD) of virtually identical shape, indicating that these engines share the same aerosol sources and underlying generation mechanisms. However, absolute concentrations differed by a factor of about six, presumably due to differences in engine design, which in turn affect key parameters such as temperature, pressure and flow rates. At BMEPs ≤ 10 bar all engines exhibited similarly low aerosol concentrations. With increasing BMEP the concentration rose exponentially. The engine with the smallest rise and the lowest total concentration featured an aluminum alloy piston, the smallest displacement, the lowest peak BMEP as well as the lowest maximum oil temperature. At maximum torque the aerosol concentration scaled fairly linearly with engine displacement. Increasing the engine speed had a minor impact on aerosol concentrations but affected blow-by flows, hence leading to a rise of aerosol mass flows. Within the limits of this comparative measurement studies, three generation mechanisms are provided for blow-by aerosols.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100150,"journal":{"name":"Automotive and Engine Technology","volume":"6 1-2","pages":"79 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41104-021-00075-4","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automotive and Engine Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41104-021-00075-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Understanding how engine design and operation affect blow-by aerosol characteristics is key to reducing the emission of particulate matter (PM) via the crankcase ventilation system. To this end, representative aerosol data from four different diesel engines are compared on the basis of brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) and engine speed. The data were obtained from comparable sampling positions, using the same sampling system and optical particle counter. The discussion is based on the narrow particle size range of 0.4–1.3 µm, chosen for its significance with regard to blow-by aerosol sources, as well as for the challenges it poses for separation systems. Key findings include particle size distributions (PSD) of virtually identical shape, indicating that these engines share the same aerosol sources and underlying generation mechanisms. However, absolute concentrations differed by a factor of about six, presumably due to differences in engine design, which in turn affect key parameters such as temperature, pressure and flow rates. At BMEPs ≤ 10 bar all engines exhibited similarly low aerosol concentrations. With increasing BMEP the concentration rose exponentially. The engine with the smallest rise and the lowest total concentration featured an aluminum alloy piston, the smallest displacement, the lowest peak BMEP as well as the lowest maximum oil temperature. At maximum torque the aerosol concentration scaled fairly linearly with engine displacement. Increasing the engine speed had a minor impact on aerosol concentrations but affected blow-by flows, hence leading to a rise of aerosol mass flows. Within the limits of this comparative measurement studies, three generation mechanisms are provided for blow-by aerosols.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种柴油发动机关于窜气气溶胶特性的比较,作为基于发动机设计和运行的减少策略的基础
了解发动机设计和运行如何影响窜气气溶胶特性是通过曲轴箱通风系统减少颗粒物(PM)排放的关键。为此,基于制动平均有效压力(BMEP)和发动机转速,对四种不同柴油发动机的代表性气溶胶数据进行了比较。使用相同的采样系统和光学粒子计数器,从可比较的采样位置获得数据。该讨论基于0.4–1.3µm的窄颗粒尺寸范围,选择该范围是因为其对窜漏气溶胶源的重要性,以及它对分离系统带来的挑战。关键发现包括形状几乎相同的颗粒尺寸分布(PSD),表明这些发动机共享相同的气溶胶来源和潜在的生成机制。然而,绝对浓度相差约六倍,可能是由于发动机设计的差异,这反过来又影响了温度、压力和流速等关键参数。在BMEP ≤ 10巴的所有发动机都表现出类似的低气溶胶浓度。随着BMEP的增加,浓度呈指数级上升。升程最小、总浓度最低的发动机采用铝合金活塞,排量最小,峰值BMEP最低,最高油温最低。在最大扭矩下,气溶胶浓度与发动机排量成线性关系。提高发动机转速对气溶胶浓度的影响很小,但会影响窜流,从而导致气溶胶质量流量的增加。在这一比较测量研究的范围内,提供了三种窜漏气溶胶的产生机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of an electrochemically approximated simulation model and a hardware substitution cell approach for thermal management battery system tests A detailed comparison of ethanol–diesel direct fuel blending to conventional ethanol–diesel dual-fuel combustion Influence of the air–fuel-ratio and fuel on the reactivity of diesel soot Introducing the double validation metric for radar sensor models Chassis concept of the individually steerable five-link suspension: a novel approach to maximize the road wheel angle to improve vehicle agility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1