Governing by Numbers: Why Calculative Practices Matter

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Social Research Pub Date : 2008-02-25 DOI:10.1002/9780470774274.CH10
Peter Miller
{"title":"Governing by Numbers: Why Calculative Practices Matter","authors":"Peter Miller","doi":"10.1002/9780470774274.CH10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sociologists are busy rediscovering the economy (Callon, 1998; Fligstein, 1990; Granovetter, 1985). The roles of networks that connect and form agents figure large in this revival of interest in the market as a social institution (Callon, 1998: 8). Until recently, however, little attention has been devoted in the sociological literature to the calculative practices that make the economy visible and measurable qua economy (Callon, 1998; Hopwood and Miller, 1994; Miller, 1998). In particular, the emergence and roles of the calculative practices of accounting have been overlooked or marginalized in the sociological literature. This paper calls for greater attention to these practices, and argues that it is important to examine their emergence, and the ways in which new calculative practices alter the capacities of agents, organizations, and the connections among them. It also examines how they alter the power relations that they shape and are embedded within, and how particular calculative practices enable new ways of acting upon and influencing the actions of individuals. Calculative practices, in other words, should be analyzed as \"technologies of government\" (Rose and Miller, 1992: 183) as the mechanisms through which programs of government are articulated and made operable. Rather than focusing on the ways in which the economy is shaped by economics, attention is directed at the ways in which accounting shapes social and economic relations.","PeriodicalId":47854,"journal":{"name":"Social Research","volume":"239 2","pages":"179-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2008-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/9780470774274.CH10","citationCount":"563","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470774274.CH10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 563

Abstract

Sociologists are busy rediscovering the economy (Callon, 1998; Fligstein, 1990; Granovetter, 1985). The roles of networks that connect and form agents figure large in this revival of interest in the market as a social institution (Callon, 1998: 8). Until recently, however, little attention has been devoted in the sociological literature to the calculative practices that make the economy visible and measurable qua economy (Callon, 1998; Hopwood and Miller, 1994; Miller, 1998). In particular, the emergence and roles of the calculative practices of accounting have been overlooked or marginalized in the sociological literature. This paper calls for greater attention to these practices, and argues that it is important to examine their emergence, and the ways in which new calculative practices alter the capacities of agents, organizations, and the connections among them. It also examines how they alter the power relations that they shape and are embedded within, and how particular calculative practices enable new ways of acting upon and influencing the actions of individuals. Calculative practices, in other words, should be analyzed as "technologies of government" (Rose and Miller, 1992: 183) as the mechanisms through which programs of government are articulated and made operable. Rather than focusing on the ways in which the economy is shaped by economics, attention is directed at the ways in which accounting shapes social and economic relations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字统治:为什么计算实践很重要
社会学家正忙于重新发现经济(Callon, 1998;Fligstein, 1990;Granovetter, 1985)。连接和形成代理人的网络的作用在市场作为一种社会制度的兴趣的复兴中占有重要地位(Callon, 1998: 8)。然而,直到最近,社会学文献中很少关注使经济可见和可衡量的计算实践(Callon, 1998;Hopwood and Miller, 1994;米勒,1998)。特别是,会计计算实践的出现和作用在社会学文献中被忽视或边缘化。本文呼吁更多地关注这些实践,并认为重要的是要研究它们的出现,以及新的计算实践如何改变代理人、组织的能力,以及它们之间的联系。它还研究了它们如何改变它们塑造和嵌入其中的权力关系,以及特定的计算实践如何使新的方式能够作用于和影响个人的行为。换句话说,计算实践应该被分析为“政府的技术”(Rose and Miller, 1992: 183),作为一种机制,通过这种机制,政府计划得以明确表达并变得可操作。与其关注经济是如何被经济学塑造的,不如关注会计是如何塑造社会经济关系的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Research
Social Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Most issues of Social Research address a single theme, which is addressed by scholars, writers, and experts from a wide range of disciplines. Some of these issues are the proceedings of our conference series; others are guest coedited by scholars who bring their unique expertise to bear on multifaceted explorations of the subjects of their interest. Some of our themes are explicitly drawn from the social sciences (such as "Civil Society" or "Prospects for Democracy" or our several issues devoted to Hannah Arendt’s work).
期刊最新文献
Beyond the nation-state? Functionalism: après la lutte In the Absence of the Face Bodies of Data: Genomic Data and Bioscience Data Sharing. The Neuroscience of Happiness and Pleasure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1