Brittle Fracture: From Elasticity Theory to Atomistic Simulations

S. Giordano, A. Mattoni, L. Colombo
{"title":"Brittle Fracture: From Elasticity Theory to Atomistic Simulations","authors":"S. Giordano, A. Mattoni, L. Colombo","doi":"10.1002/9780470890905.CH1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the mechanical properties of materials with theory traditionally has been done by using continuum methods, ranging from elastic theory (in both linear and nonlinear regimes), to plastic theory, and to fracture mechanics. The computational counterpart of continuum modeling is represented by finite element analysis. Continuum theories have been extremely successful, as proved by the tremendous achievements reached in structural design of buildings, ships, bridges, air-/space crafts, nuclear reactors, and so on. Overall this represents the core of theoretical and computational solid mechanics. In the last 20 years or so, the technological rush toward nano-sized systems has forced researchers to investigate mechanical phenomena at a length scale in which matter no longer can be considered as a continuum. This is the case, for instance, of investigating the crack-related features in a material displaying elastic or structural complexity (or, equivalently, inhomogeneity or disorder) at the nanoscale. This problem of atomic-scale granularity immediately seems to be prohibitive for (standard) solid mechanics. To better elaborate on this","PeriodicalId":51148,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Computational Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/9780470890905.CH1","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Computational Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470890905.CH1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Understanding the mechanical properties of materials with theory traditionally has been done by using continuum methods, ranging from elastic theory (in both linear and nonlinear regimes), to plastic theory, and to fracture mechanics. The computational counterpart of continuum modeling is represented by finite element analysis. Continuum theories have been extremely successful, as proved by the tremendous achievements reached in structural design of buildings, ships, bridges, air-/space crafts, nuclear reactors, and so on. Overall this represents the core of theoretical and computational solid mechanics. In the last 20 years or so, the technological rush toward nano-sized systems has forced researchers to investigate mechanical phenomena at a length scale in which matter no longer can be considered as a continuum. This is the case, for instance, of investigating the crack-related features in a material displaying elastic or structural complexity (or, equivalently, inhomogeneity or disorder) at the nanoscale. This problem of atomic-scale granularity immediately seems to be prohibitive for (standard) solid mechanics. To better elaborate on this
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脆性断裂:从弹性理论到原子模拟
用理论来理解材料的力学性能传统上是通过使用连续体方法来完成的,从弹性理论(线性和非线性)到塑性理论,再到断裂力学。连续体模型的计算对应是用有限元分析来表示的。连续体理论非常成功,在建筑、船舶、桥梁、航空/航天飞机、核反应堆等结构设计方面取得的巨大成就证明了这一点。总的来说,这代表了理论和计算固体力学的核心。在过去20年左右的时间里,纳米级系统的技术热潮迫使研究人员在一个长度尺度上研究机械现象,在这个尺度上,物质不再被认为是连续的。例如,在纳米尺度上研究具有弹性或结构复杂性(或非均匀性或无序性)的材料中的裂纹相关特征就是这种情况。对于(标准)固体力学来说,原子尺度粒度的问题似乎是令人望而却步的。为了更好地阐述这一点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Computational Chemistry
Reviews in Computational Chemistry CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Volume 32 THE CONSTRUCTION OF AB INITIO‐BASED POTENTIAL ENERGY SURFACES LATTICE‐BOLTZMANN MODELING OF MULTICOMPONENT SYSTEMS MODELING MECHANOCHEMISTRY FROM FIRST PRINCIPLES INDEX
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1